Benefits of a contralateral routing of signal device for unilateral Naída CI cochlear implant recipients.
Binaurality
CROS
Cochlear implantation
Speech intelligibility
Subjective benefit
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
08
01
2019
accepted:
08
05
2019
pubmed:
19
5
2019
medline:
19
11
2019
entrez:
19
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Many bilaterally deaf adults are only able to receive one cochlear implant (CI), resulting in suboptimal listening performance, especially in challenging listening environments. Adding a contralateral routing of signal (CROS) device to a unilateral CI is one possibility to alleviate these challenges. This study examined the benefit of such a CROS device. Thirteen adult subjects with at least 6 months of CI use, and no or limited benefit of a hearing instrument in the contralateral ear were included in the study. The perceived benefit of a CROS device in everyday listening environments was evaluated up to 1 year after initial fitting using several questionnaires. Speech intelligibility performance was determined using the French matrix sentence test in quiet and in two speech-in-noise setups and was followed for 3 months after CROS fitting. Subjects indicated high satisfaction with the practical usability of the CROS device and long-term device retention was high. Perceived benefits in everyday listening environments were reported. Formal speech intelligibility tests revealed statistically significant median improvements of 6.93 dB SPL (Wilcoxon Z = 2.380, p = 0.017) in quiet and up to 8.00 dB SNR (Wilcoxon Z = 2.366, p = 0.018) in noise. These benefits were accessible immediately without a need for prolonged acclimatization. Subjective satisfaction and device retention as well as speech intelligibility benefits in quiet and in noise prove the CROS device to be a valuable addition to a unilateral CI in cases of bilateral deafness where bilateral implantation is not an option.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31102018
doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05467-9
pii: 10.1007/s00405-019-05467-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2205-2213Références
Clin Otolaryngol. 2012 Oct;37(5):342-54
pubmed: 22928754
Clin Otolaryngol. 2015 Dec;40(6):535-44
pubmed: 25715980
Int J Audiol. 2012 Mar;51(3):164-73
pubmed: 22122354
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Apr;30(3):313-8
pubmed: 19318885
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Sep;272(9):2213-9
pubmed: 24952106
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Mar;30(3):235-242
pubmed: 30461413
Audiol Neurootol. 2016;21(4):261-267
pubmed: 27653609
Laryngoscope. 2013 Mar;123(3):746-51
pubmed: 23404529
Int J Audiol. 2004 Feb;43(2):85-99
pubmed: 15035561
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Mar;142(3):249-56
pubmed: 26796630
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Jul/Aug;30(7):579-589
pubmed: 30541657
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Feb;34(2):190-8
pubmed: 23444466
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Oct;35(9):e233-9
pubmed: 25226266
Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20(2):73-80
pubmed: 25501444
Cochlear Implants Int. 2019 Jul;20(4):182-189
pubmed: 30821202
Ear Hear. 1995 Apr;16(2):176-86
pubmed: 7789669
Laryngoscope. 2015 Jan;125(1):197-202
pubmed: 25224587
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Jul;140(1):393
pubmed: 27475163
Ear Hear. 2017 May/Jun;38(3):368-373
pubmed: 28166088
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jun;124(6):1452-8
pubmed: 24431194
Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14(2):106-14
pubmed: 18832816
Int J Audiol. 2013 Jun;52(6):409-12
pubmed: 23651462