A Comparison of Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists to Low-Dose Inhaled Corticosteroids in the Elderly with Mild Asthma.


Journal

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
ISSN: 2213-2201
Titre abrégé: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101597220

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 11 07 2018
revised: 04 05 2019
accepted: 06 05 2019
pubmed: 21 5 2019
medline: 28 10 2020
entrez: 21 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although elderly patients with asthma have clinical characteristics different from those of young adults, few studies or guidelines have focused on specific treatments for this population. This study compared the effectiveness of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) versus inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) in elderly patients with asthma in real-world settings. We extracted records for elderly patients with asthma who were newly prescribed LTRAs or low-dose ICSs from January 2003 to December 2010 from National Sample Cohort data of Korea. We defined the first prescription date for each medication as the index date. We compared the risks of asthma exacerbation between the 2 groups using Cox proportional-hazard regression after propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance covariates between treatment groups. We also compared asthma-related health care resource utilization and medication compliance in both groups using chi-square test and t test. The number of identified patients newly treated with LTRAs and low-dose ICSs was 1571 and 121, respectively. The risks of asthma exacerbation in the LTRA and low-dose ICS groups after weighting were not significantly different (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.65-1.54). The proportion with high compliance (medication possession ratio ≥ 80%) in the LTRA group was higher than that in the low-dose ICS group. The effectiveness of LTRAs was not different from that of low-dose ICSs regarding the risk of asthma exacerbation in elderly patients with asthma in real-world settings. Given the practical benefits gained from convenient administration, LTRAs can be considered a reasonable alternative first-line therapy for elderly patients with mild asthma.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Although elderly patients with asthma have clinical characteristics different from those of young adults, few studies or guidelines have focused on specific treatments for this population.
OBJECTIVE
This study compared the effectiveness of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) versus inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) in elderly patients with asthma in real-world settings.
METHODS
We extracted records for elderly patients with asthma who were newly prescribed LTRAs or low-dose ICSs from January 2003 to December 2010 from National Sample Cohort data of Korea. We defined the first prescription date for each medication as the index date. We compared the risks of asthma exacerbation between the 2 groups using Cox proportional-hazard regression after propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance covariates between treatment groups. We also compared asthma-related health care resource utilization and medication compliance in both groups using chi-square test and t test.
RESULTS
The number of identified patients newly treated with LTRAs and low-dose ICSs was 1571 and 121, respectively. The risks of asthma exacerbation in the LTRA and low-dose ICS groups after weighting were not significantly different (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.65-1.54). The proportion with high compliance (medication possession ratio ≥ 80%) in the LTRA group was higher than that in the low-dose ICS group.
CONCLUSIONS
The effectiveness of LTRAs was not different from that of low-dose ICSs regarding the risk of asthma exacerbation in elderly patients with asthma in real-world settings. Given the practical benefits gained from convenient administration, LTRAs can be considered a reasonable alternative first-line therapy for elderly patients with mild asthma.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31108218
pii: S2213-2198(19)30459-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.05.006
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Adrenal Cortex Hormones 0
Anti-Asthmatic Agents 0
Leukotriene Antagonists 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2642-2652.e3

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Sung-Hyun Hong (SH)

School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.

Hye-Rim Kang (HR)

School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.

Jin Hyun Nam (JH)

Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Sun-Kyeong Park (SK)

School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.

Tae-Bum Kim (TB)

Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address: tbkim@amc.seoul.kr.

Eui-Kyung Lee (EK)

School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea. Electronic address: ekyung@skku.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH