Effect of gestation dietary methionine/lysine ratio on placental angiogenesis and reproductive performance of sows1.
Animals
Birth Weight
/ drug effects
Diet
/ veterinary
Female
Lactation
Litter Size
/ drug effects
Lysine
/ pharmacology
Methionine
/ pharmacology
Neovascularization, Physiologic
/ drug effects
Nutritional Requirements
Parity
/ drug effects
Parturition
/ drug effects
Placenta
/ blood supply
Pregnancy
Reproduction
/ drug effects
Swine
methionine
placental angiogenesis
pregnant sows
reproductive performance
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Jul 2019
30 Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
20
03
2019
accepted:
18
05
2019
pubmed:
22
5
2019
medline:
16
11
2019
entrez:
22
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The current study aims to evaluate the effects of different gestation dietary Met/Lys (methionine, Met/lysine) ratios on the production performance of sows. Specifically, it measured the effect of Met on plasma urea and AA concentrations and placental vascular density of pregnant sows. A total of 325 multiparous sows (third parity, Large × White) were randomly allocated to five dietary treatments (n = 65) with five dietary Met/Lys ratios 0.27 (nutrient requirements of swine [NRC] 2012 level), 0.32, 0.37, 0.42, and 0.47). The litter size and weight at birth were measured and recorded. Blood samples were obtained on days 0, 40, 90, and 114 of gestation, and placenta samples were collected at parturition. The effects of different dietary Met/Lys ratios on the reproductive performance were evaluated based on the prolificacy of sows as either high (≥13 total piglets born) or low (<13 total piglets born). The results showed that dietary Met/Lys ratio had no significant effect on the reproductive performance of lower prolificacy sows (P > 0.05). However, for high-prolificacy sows, litter weight of born alive significantly increased in 0.37 Met/Lys ratios group compared with control group (P < 0.05). The gestation dietary Met/Lys ratio showed significant quadratic effects on the litter birth weight and percentage of piglets born with weight <0.9 kg (P < 0.05), and the Met/Lys ratios to achieve the best reproductive performance determined to be 0.37. Furthermore, plasma urea concentrations of sows also changed with Met/Lys ratios quadratically (P < 0.05). Increasing dietary Met/Lys ratios elevated the concentration of most plasma AA. Although the dietary Met/Lys ratio had no significant effect on the placental vascular density (P > 0.05), the gestation dietary Met/Lys ratio showed significant quadratic effects on the placental vascular density (P < 0.05). In addition, the birth weight of piglets of high-prolificacy sows was positively correlated with the placental vascular density (P < 0.01). Taken as a whole, the dietary Met/Lys ratio showed a quadratic curve relation with birth weight performance and placental angiogenesis performance, to which 0.37 ratio contributed to the best performance of high-prolificacy sows.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31111159
pii: 5492502
doi: 10.1093/jas/skz175
pmc: PMC6667266
doi:
Substances chimiques
Methionine
AE28F7PNPL
Lysine
K3Z4F929H6
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3487-3497Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
J Nutr. 1999 May;129(5):1031-8
pubmed: 10222396
J Anim Sci. 1999 Apr;77(4):954-9
pubmed: 10328362
J Anim Sci. 1999 Jul;77(7):1654-8
pubmed: 10438009
Biol Reprod. 2001 Jun;64(6):1821-5
pubmed: 11369614
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;187(3):764-9
pubmed: 12237661
J Anim Sci. 2004 Nov;82(11):3189-97
pubmed: 15542465
Biol Reprod. 2005 Apr;72(4):842-50
pubmed: 15576824
J Anim Sci. 2005 Nov;83(11):2527-34
pubmed: 16230649
J Nutr. 2006 Jun;136(6 Suppl):1701S-1705S
pubmed: 16702342
Clin Sci (Lond). 2007 Jul;113(1):1-13
pubmed: 17536998
Semin Perinatol. 2008 Jun;32(3):172-7
pubmed: 18482617
Amino Acids. 2012 Jun;42(6):2207-14
pubmed: 21691753
Microvasc Res. 2012 Mar;83(2):98-104
pubmed: 22085786
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2012 Jun;13(2):109-19
pubmed: 22418620
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2012;24(4):550-8
pubmed: 22541543
Anim Reprod Sci. 2012 May;132(1-2):44-9
pubmed: 22607771
Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2013;74:127-38
pubmed: 23887111
J Anim Sci. 2015 Nov;93(11):5291-303
pubmed: 26641049
J Anim Sci. 2017 Jan;95(1):248-256
pubmed: 28177374
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 4;8(27):44511-44520
pubmed: 28562346
Anim Reprod Sci. 2017 Sep;184:20-28
pubmed: 28789824
Amino Acids. 2017 Dec;49(12):2091-2098
pubmed: 28929442
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2018 May;62(10):e1700951
pubmed: 29603632
Int J Obes (Lond). 2018 Oct;42(10):1812-1820
pubmed: 29795472
Food Funct. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):4979-4988
pubmed: 30187897
Fertil Steril. 1988 Feb;49(2):216-20
pubmed: 3338579
J Nutr. 1994 Mar;124(3):415-24
pubmed: 8120661
J Anim Sci. 1993 Jan;71(1):239-46
pubmed: 8454547
J Anim Sci. 1977 Apr;44(4):620-37
pubmed: 853021
Biol Reprod. 1998 Apr;58(4):905-10
pubmed: 9546719