Mesh colposacropexy in the management of anterior vaginal compartment prolapse.
genital prolapse
mesh sacrocolpopexy
sacrospinous ligament
Journal
Journal of medicine and life
ISSN: 1844-3117
Titre abrégé: J Med Life
Pays: Romania
ID NLM: 101477617
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
25
5
2019
pubmed:
28
5
2019
medline:
10
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pelvic organ prolapse is a frequent female pathology, often causing a negative impact on the patient's quality of life. The purpose of this paper is to present the results that we have achieved in 32 patients with anterior vaginal compartment prolapse, managed using the transvaginal mesh approach. Over a period of twelve months, we have performed 32 transvaginal reconstructive procedures using a four arms polypropylene mesh. The superior arms of the mesh have been passed through the obturator foramen while the inferior arms have been passed through the sacrospinous ligament. The surgery has lead to a significant improvement in the quality of life in this group of patients, this being assessed using self-administered questionnaires that evaluated the quality of life, the sexual function, and urinary continence. Anatomical success was achieved in 96.87% of the cases. In terms of postoperative complications, we mention one case of vaginal erosion, one case of de novo dyspareunia and three cases of pelvic discomfort. So far we have not encountered any mesh exposure cases nor prolapse recurrence. Considering the results that we have achieved in our study, we can conclude that the transvaginal polypropylene mesh approach can prove itself to be a viable solution for the management of genital prolapse, especially if we consider the high postoperative rates of anatomical success and low rates of postoperative complications, as well as improving the patient's quality of life. In spite of these encouraging results, the fact that in recent years FDA has emitted several warnings in terms of postoperative complications following such procedures, as well as the fact that our study was conducted on a small group of patients, limits the strength of our research, its only purpose being to present our experience for this surgical approach over a limited period of time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31123527
doi: 10.25122/jml-2019-0018
pii: JMedLife-12-065
pmc: PMC6527416
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
65-70Références
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1160-6
pubmed: 12066091
Urology. 2004 Apr;63(4):665-70
pubmed: 15072875
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;104(3):489-97
pubmed: 15339758
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;104(4):805-23
pubmed: 15458906
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Jan;18(1):73-9
pubmed: 16391882
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;194(5):1455-61
pubmed: 16647928
Lancet. 2007 Mar 24;369(9566):1027-38
pubmed: 17382829
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Oct;134(2):147-56
pubmed: 17459563
J Urol. 2008 Jun;179(6):2111-8
pubmed: 18423726
JAMA. 2008 Sep 17;300(11):1311-6
pubmed: 18799443
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):519.e1-8
pubmed: 19716533
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;53(1):99-114
pubmed: 20142647
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;203(5):506.e1-6
pubmed: 20817144
Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jan;22(1):3-15
pubmed: 21140130
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;204(4):360.e1-7
pubmed: 21306698
World J Urol. 2013 Jun;31(3):623-8
pubmed: 22488530
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 21;366(25):2358-67
pubmed: 22716974
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;121(2 Pt 1):279-84
pubmed: 23344277
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;121(2 Pt 1):354-74
pubmed: 23344287
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013 Mar-Apr;108(2):250-5
pubmed: 23618577
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;(4):CD004014
pubmed: 23633316
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Nov;24(11):1883-91
pubmed: 23652338
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Jan 16;6:83-94
pubmed: 24474848
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;53(3):348-54
pubmed: 25286789
Korean J Urol. 2014 Nov;55(11):693-702
pubmed: 25405010
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):552-8
pubmed: 25510700
Int J Womens Health. 2015 Apr 01;7:331-43
pubmed: 25848324