The association between public access defibrillation and outcome in witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with shockable rhythm.


Journal

Resuscitation
ISSN: 1873-1570
Titre abrégé: Resuscitation
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0332173

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2019
Historique:
received: 23 11 2018
revised: 28 02 2019
accepted: 16 05 2019
pubmed: 28 5 2019
medline: 28 8 2020
entrez: 27 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

It is recommended globally that shocks by automated external defibrillators (AEDs) should be delivered immediately when a shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurs. However, the actual time-interval from collapse to first shock by public-access AED and its impact on subsequent outcome has not been extensively investigated in real-world settings. OHCA data from 2013 to 2015 were obtained from the All-Japan Utstein Registry. Bystander-witnessed OHCA patients with shockable rhythm who were shocked by public-access AED in public locations were included. The primary endpoint was 1-month survival with favourable neurological outcome, and the association between time-interval from collapse to first shock by public-access AED and subsequent outcome was assessed. During the study period, 28% (2282/8126) of bystander-witnessed OHCA cases with shockable rhythm were shocked by public-access AED in public locations. The proportion of OHCA patients who were shocked by public-access AED within 5 min from collapse was 58% (1323/2282). Among these patients, the proportion of 1-month survival with favourable neurological outcome was 62% (815/1317). The proportion significantly decreased with increased time from collapse to shock by public-access AED (48% for 6-10 min, 38% for 11-15 min, 30% for 16-20 min, and 7% for 21-25 min; p-for-trend <0.001), and no patient survived if shock delivery occurred more than 26 min after OHCA. In Japan, earlier shock by public-access AED led to better outcome after bystander-witnessed OHCA with shockable rhythm in public locations. However, the proportion of OHCA patients who received early shock was still low in public locations.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
It is recommended globally that shocks by automated external defibrillators (AEDs) should be delivered immediately when a shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurs. However, the actual time-interval from collapse to first shock by public-access AED and its impact on subsequent outcome has not been extensively investigated in real-world settings.
METHODS
OHCA data from 2013 to 2015 were obtained from the All-Japan Utstein Registry. Bystander-witnessed OHCA patients with shockable rhythm who were shocked by public-access AED in public locations were included. The primary endpoint was 1-month survival with favourable neurological outcome, and the association between time-interval from collapse to first shock by public-access AED and subsequent outcome was assessed.
RESULTS
During the study period, 28% (2282/8126) of bystander-witnessed OHCA cases with shockable rhythm were shocked by public-access AED in public locations. The proportion of OHCA patients who were shocked by public-access AED within 5 min from collapse was 58% (1323/2282). Among these patients, the proportion of 1-month survival with favourable neurological outcome was 62% (815/1317). The proportion significantly decreased with increased time from collapse to shock by public-access AED (48% for 6-10 min, 38% for 11-15 min, 30% for 16-20 min, and 7% for 21-25 min; p-for-trend <0.001), and no patient survived if shock delivery occurred more than 26 min after OHCA.
CONCLUSION
In Japan, earlier shock by public-access AED led to better outcome after bystander-witnessed OHCA with shockable rhythm in public locations. However, the proportion of OHCA patients who received early shock was still low in public locations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31129227
pii: S0300-9572(19)30186-8
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.05.017
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

93-97

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Kosuke Kiyohara (K)

Department of Food Science, Faculty of Home Economics, Otsuma Women's University, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: kiyosuke0817@hotmail.com.

Chika Nishiyama (C)

Department of Critical Care Nursing, Kyoto University Graduate School of Human Health Science, Kyoto, Japan.

Tetsuhisa Kitamura (T)

Division of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

Tasuku Matsuyama (T)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Junya Sado (J)

Medicine for Sports and Performing Arts, Department of Health and Sport Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.

Tomonari Shimamoto (T)

Kyoto University Health Service, Kyoto, Japan.

Daisuke Kobayashi (D)

Kyoto University Health Service, Kyoto, Japan.

Takeyuki Kiguchi (T)

Kyoto University Health Service, Kyoto, Japan.

Satoe Okabayashi (S)

Kyoto University Health Service, Kyoto, Japan.

Takashi Kawamura (T)

Kyoto University Health Service, Kyoto, Japan.

Taku Iwami (T)

Kyoto University Health Service, Kyoto, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH