Developing a new quality of life instrument with older people for economic evaluation in aged care: study protocol.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 05 2019
Historique:
entrez: 27 5 2019
pubmed: 28 5 2019
medline: 12 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The ageing of the population represents a significant challenge for aged care in Australia and in many other countries internationally. In an environment of increasing resource constraints, new methods, techniques and evaluative frameworks are needed to support resource allocation decisions that maximise the quality of life and well-being of older people. Economic evaluation offers a rigorous, systematical and transparent framework for measuring quality and efficiency, but there is currently no composite mechanism for incorporating older people's values into the measurement and valuation of quality of life for quality assessment and economic evaluation. In addition, to date relatively few economic evaluations have been conducted in aged care despite the large potential benefits associated with their application in this sector. This study will generate a new preference based older person-specific quality of life instrument designed for application in economic evaluation and co-created from its inception with older people. A candidate descriptive system for the new instrument will be developed by synthesising the findings from a series of in-depth qualitative interviews with 40 older people currently in receipt of aged care services about the salient factors which make up their quality of life. The candidate descriptive system will be tested for construct validity, practicality and reliability with a new independent sample of older people (n=100). Quality of life state valuation tasks using best worst scaling (a form of discrete choice experiment) will then be undertaken with a representative sample of older people currently receiving aged care services across five Australian states (n=500). A multinomial (conditional) logistical framework will be used to analyse responses and generate a scoring algorithm for the new preference-based instrument. The new quality of life instrument will have wide potential applicability in assessing the cost effectiveness of new service innovations and for quality assessment across the spectrum of ageing and aged care. Results will be disseminated in ageing, quality of life research and health economics journals and through professional conferences and policy forums. This study has been reviewed by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of South Australia and has ethics approval (Application ID: 201644).

Identifiants

pubmed: 31129602
pii: bmjopen-2018-028647
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028647
pmc: PMC6538028
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e028647

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Jul;35(7):697-716
pubmed: 28374325
Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(9):i-iv, 1-164
pubmed: 10392311
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 25;4(6):e005788
pubmed: 24965918
Qual Life Res. 2015 May;24(5):1255-73
pubmed: 25381122
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Jun;15(3):399-412
pubmed: 27882528
Soc Sci Med. 2016 May;157:48-59
pubmed: 27060541
Qual Life Res. 2017 Feb;26(2):299-309
pubmed: 27553968
Value Health. 2012 Dec;15(8):991-8
pubmed: 23244799
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
J Rehabil Med. 2013 Jan;45(1):81-6
pubmed: 23037892
Health Econ. 2012 Jun;21(6):730-41
pubmed: 21557381
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Oct;13(5):485-92
pubmed: 26135244
Value Health. 2017 Jan;20(1):18-27
pubmed: 28212961
Value Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):275-84
pubmed: 18380640
Age Ageing. 2010 Jul;39(4):426-9
pubmed: 20444804
J Rehabil Med. 2011 Mar;43(4):354-8
pubmed: 21305229
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Feb;12(1):73-84
pubmed: 24254996
Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):655-9
pubmed: 25128060
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007 Dec;31(6):545-50
pubmed: 18081575
Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1273-81
pubmed: 24124354

Auteurs

Julie Ratcliffe (J)

College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Ian Cameron (I)

Rehabilitation Studies Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Emily Lancsar (E)

College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Ruth Walker (R)

College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Rachel Milte (R)

College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Claire Louise Hutchinson (CL)

College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Kate Swaffer (K)

Dementia Alliance International, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Stuart Parker (S)

Institute of Health and Society/Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH