Reliability of tumor segmentation in glioblastoma: Impact on the robustness of MRI-radiomic features.


Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Historique:
received: 16 01 2019
revised: 21 05 2019
accepted: 21 05 2019
pubmed: 28 5 2019
medline: 23 1 2020
entrez: 28 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The use of radiomic features as biomarkers of treatment response and outcome or as correlates to genomic variations requires that the computed features are robust and reproducible. Segmentation, a crucial step in radiomic analysis, is a major source of variability in the computed radiomic features. Therefore, we studied the impact of tumor segmentation variability on the robustness of MRI radiomic features. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1WI Our results show that both segmentation methods are reliable with ICC ≥ 0.96 and standard deviation (SD) of mean differences between the two raters (SD Semiautomatic and interactive segmentation methods using two raters are both reliable. The interactive method produced more robust features than the semiautomatic method. We also found that the robustness of radiomic features varied by categories. Therefore, this study could help motivate segmentation methods and feature selection in MRI radiomic studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31131906
doi: 10.1002/mp.13624
pmc: PMC6692188
mid: NIHMS1032557
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3582-3591

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60
pubmed: 10501650
Pattern Recognit. 2009 Jun 1;42(6):1162-1171
pubmed: 20161266
J Nucl Med. 2011 Mar;52(3):369-78
pubmed: 21321270
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1986 May;8(5):651-64
pubmed: 21869362
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar;48(4):441-6
pubmed: 22257792
Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1234-48
pubmed: 22898692
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1364
pubmed: 23455483
J Digit Imaging. 2013 Dec;26(6):1045-57
pubmed: 23884657
Sci Rep. 2013 Dec 18;3:3529
pubmed: 24346241
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 15;9(7):e102107
pubmed: 25025374
NMR Biomed. 2014 Sep;27(9):1103-11
pubmed: 25066520
Neuro Oncol. 2015 Mar;17(3):466-76
pubmed: 25121771
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Oct;34(10):1993-2024
pubmed: 25494501
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Nov;42(5):1398-406
pubmed: 25850931
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jul 21;60(14):5471-96
pubmed: 26119045
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Jun;75(6):2505-16
pubmed: 26173745
J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;124(4):977-88
pubmed: 26495941
Radiology. 2016 Feb;278(2):563-77
pubmed: 26579733
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 24;10(11):e0143308
pubmed: 26600392
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 1;22(21):5256-5264
pubmed: 27185368
Med Phys. 2016 Jun;43(6):2835-2844
pubmed: 27277032
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 Feb;12(2):183-203
pubmed: 27651330
Acad Radiol. 2016 Dec;23(12):1559-1567
pubmed: 27665235
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Dec 1;22(23):5765-5771
pubmed: 27803067
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2016;2:
pubmed: 27853751
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 May;38(5):890-898
pubmed: 28255030
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:4035-4038
pubmed: 28325002
Med Phys. 2018 Mar;45(3):1150-1158
pubmed: 29356028
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Apr;157:69-84
pubmed: 29477436
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Apr;5(2):021219
pubmed: 29531967
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 19;8(1):4838
pubmed: 29556054
Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):3640-3650
pubmed: 29564594
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 23;8(1):5087
pubmed: 29572492
Phys Med. 2018 Apr;48:27-36
pubmed: 29728226
Med Phys. 2018 Jun 13;:
pubmed: 29896896
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Nov 15;102(4):1074-1082
pubmed: 30170101
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Nov 15;102(4):1143-1158
pubmed: 30170872
Radiology. 2018 Dec;289(3):797-806
pubmed: 30277442
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Feb 14;21(2):264-273
pubmed: 30346623
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;21:101648
pubmed: 30630760
Oncotarget. 2019 Jan 18;10(6):660-672
pubmed: 30774763
Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2011 Mar-Apr;2011:1645-1648
pubmed: 30881602
J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Jul;2(7):1160-9
pubmed: 4020513

Auteurs

Florent Tixier (F)

Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Hyemin Um (H)

Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Robert J Young (RJ)

Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Harini Veeraraghavan (H)

Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Articles similaires

Humans Ketamine Propofol Pulmonary Atelectasis Female

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms, Imaging Infant, Newborn Signal-To-Noise Ratio

Classifications MeSH