Tramadol for osteoarthritis.


Journal

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 05 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 28 5 2019
medline: 18 6 2019
entrez: 28 5 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Tramadol is often prescribed to treat pain and is associated physical disability in osteoarthritis (OA). Due to the pharmacologic mechanism of tramadol, it may lead to fewer associated adverse effects (i.e. gastrointestinal bleeding or renal problems) compared to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This is an update of a Cochrane Review originally published in 2006. To determine the benefits and harms of oral tramadol or tramadol combined with acetaminophen or NSAIDs in people with osteoarthritis. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase databases, as well as the US National Institutes of Health and World Health Organization trial registries up to February 2018. We searched the LILACS database up to August 2015. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effect of tramadol, or tramadol in combination with acetaminophen (paracetamol) or NSAIDs versus placebo or any comparator in people with osteoarthritis. We used standard methodologic procedures expected by Cochrane. We included 22 RCTs (11 more than the previous review) of which 21 RCTs were included in meta-analyses for 3871 participants randomized to tramadol alone or tramadol in combination with another analgesic and 2625 participants randomized to placebo or active control. Seventeen studies evaluated tramadol alone and five evaluated tramadol plus acetaminophen. Thirteen studies used placebo controls and eleven studies used active controls (two trials had both placebo and active arms). The dose of tramadol ranged from 37.5 mg to 400 mg daily; all doses were pooled. Most trials were multicenter with a mean duration of two months. Participants were predominantly women with hip or knee osteoarthritis, with a mean age of 63 years and moderate to severe pain. There was a high risk of selection bias as only four trials reported both adequate sequence generation and allocation concealment. There was a low risk for performance bias as most studies blinded participants. There was a high risk of attrition bias as 10/22 trials showed incomplete outcome data. Most of the trials were funded by the pharmaceutical industry.Moderate quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias) indicated that tramadol alone and in combination with acetaminophen had no important benefit on pain reduction compared to placebo control (tramadol alone: 4% absolute improvement, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3% to 5%; 8 studies, 3972 participants; tramadol in combination with acetaminophen: 4% absolute improvement, 95% CI 2% to 6%; 2 studies, 614 participants).Fifteen out of 100 people in the tramadol group improved by 20% (which corresponded to a clinically important difference in pain) compared to 10/100 in the placebo group (5% absolute improvement). Twelve out of 100 people improved by 20% in the tramadol in combination with acetaminophen group compared to 7/100 in the placebo group (5% absolute improvement).Moderate quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias) indicated that tramadol alone and in combination with acetaminophen led to no important benefit in physical function compared to placebo (tramadol alone: 4% absolute improvement, 95% CI 2% to 6%; 5 studies, 2550 participants; tramadol in combination with acetaminophen: 4% absolute improvement, 95% CI 2% to 7%; 2 studies, 614 participants).Twenty-one out of 100 people in the tramadol group improved by 20% (which corresponded to a clinically important difference in physical function) compared to 16/100 in the placebo group (5% absolute improvement). Fifteen out of 100 people improved by 20% in the tramadol in combination with acetaminophen group compared to 10/100 in the placebo group (5% absolute improvement).Moderate quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias) indicated that, compared to placebo, there was a greater risk of developing adverse events with tramadol alone (risk ratio (RR) 1.34, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.46; 4 studies, 2039 participants) and tramadol in combination with acetaminophen compared to placebo (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.76; 1 study, 308 participants). This corresponded to a 17% increase (95% CI 12% to 23%) with tramadol alone and 22% increase (95% CI 8% to 41%) with tramadol in combination with acetaminophen.The three most frequent adverse events were nausea, dizziness and tiredness. Moderate quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias) indicated that there was a greater risk of withdrawing from the study because of adverse events with tramadol alone compared to placebo (RR 2.64, 95% CI 2.17 to 3.20; 9 studies, 4533 participants), which corresponded to a 12% increase (95% CI 9% to 16%).Low quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias and inconsistency) indicated that there was a greater risk of withdrawing from the study because of adverse events with tramadol in combination with acetaminophen compared to placebo (RR 2.78, 95% CI 1.50 to 5.16; 2 studies, 614 participants), which corresponded to a 8% absolute improvement (95% CI 2% to 19%).Low quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision) indicated that there was a greater risk of developing serious adverse events with tramadol alone compared to placebo (110/2459 participants with tramadol compared to 22/1153 participants with placebo; RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.84; 7 studies, 3612 participants), which corresponded to a 1% increase (95% CI 0% to 4%). There were no serious adverse events reported in one small study (15 participants) of tramadol with acetaminophen compared to placebo. Moderate quality evidence indicates that compared to placebo, tramadol alone or in combination with acetaminophen probably has no important benefit on mean pain or function in people with osteoarthritis, although slightly more people in the tramadol group report an important improvement (defined as 20% or more). Moderate quality evidence shows that adverse events probably cause substantially more participants to stop taking tramadol. The increase in serious adverse events with tramadol is less certain, due to the small number of events.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Tramadol is often prescribed to treat pain and is associated physical disability in osteoarthritis (OA). Due to the pharmacologic mechanism of tramadol, it may lead to fewer associated adverse effects (i.e. gastrointestinal bleeding or renal problems) compared to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This is an update of a Cochrane Review originally published in 2006.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the benefits and harms of oral tramadol or tramadol combined with acetaminophen or NSAIDs in people with osteoarthritis.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase databases, as well as the US National Institutes of Health and World Health Organization trial registries up to February 2018. We searched the LILACS database up to August 2015.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effect of tramadol, or tramadol in combination with acetaminophen (paracetamol) or NSAIDs versus placebo or any comparator in people with osteoarthritis.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodologic procedures expected by Cochrane.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 22 RCTs (11 more than the previous review) of which 21 RCTs were included in meta-analyses for 3871 participants randomized to tramadol alone or tramadol in combination with another analgesic and 2625 participants randomized to placebo or active control. Seventeen studies evaluated tramadol alone and five evaluated tramadol plus acetaminophen. Thirteen studies used placebo controls and eleven studies used active controls (two trials had both placebo and active arms). The dose of tramadol ranged from 37.5 mg to 400 mg daily; all doses were pooled. Most trials were multicenter with a mean duration of two months. Participants were predominantly women with hip or knee osteoarthritis, with a mean age of 63 years and moderate to severe pain. There was a high risk of selection bias as only four trials reported both adequate sequence generation and allocation concealment. There was a low risk for performance bias as most studies blinded participants. There was a high risk of attrition bias as 10/22 trials showed incomplete outcome data. Most of the trials were funded by the pharmaceutical industry.Moderate quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias) indicated that tramadol alone and in combination with acetaminophen had no important benefit on pain reduction compared to placebo control (tramadol alone: 4% absolute improvement, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3% to 5%; 8 studies, 3972 participants; tramadol in combination with acetaminophen: 4% absolute improvement, 95% CI 2% to 6%; 2 studies, 614 participants).Fifteen out of 100 people in the tramadol group improved by 20% (which corresponded to a clinically important difference in pain) compared to 10/100 in the placebo group (5% absolute improvement). Twelve out of 100 people improved by 20% in the tramadol in combination with acetaminophen group compared to 7/100 in the placebo group (5% absolute improvement).Moderate quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias) indicated that tramadol alone and in combination with acetaminophen led to no important benefit in physical function compared to placebo (tramadol alone: 4% absolute improvement, 95% CI 2% to 6%; 5 studies, 2550 participants; tramadol in combination with acetaminophen: 4% absolute improvement, 95% CI 2% to 7%; 2 studies, 614 participants).Twenty-one out of 100 people in the tramadol group improved by 20% (which corresponded to a clinically important difference in physical function) compared to 16/100 in the placebo group (5% absolute improvement). Fifteen out of 100 people improved by 20% in the tramadol in combination with acetaminophen group compared to 10/100 in the placebo group (5% absolute improvement).Moderate quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias) indicated that, compared to placebo, there was a greater risk of developing adverse events with tramadol alone (risk ratio (RR) 1.34, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.46; 4 studies, 2039 participants) and tramadol in combination with acetaminophen compared to placebo (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.76; 1 study, 308 participants). This corresponded to a 17% increase (95% CI 12% to 23%) with tramadol alone and 22% increase (95% CI 8% to 41%) with tramadol in combination with acetaminophen.The three most frequent adverse events were nausea, dizziness and tiredness. Moderate quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias) indicated that there was a greater risk of withdrawing from the study because of adverse events with tramadol alone compared to placebo (RR 2.64, 95% CI 2.17 to 3.20; 9 studies, 4533 participants), which corresponded to a 12% increase (95% CI 9% to 16%).Low quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias and inconsistency) indicated that there was a greater risk of withdrawing from the study because of adverse events with tramadol in combination with acetaminophen compared to placebo (RR 2.78, 95% CI 1.50 to 5.16; 2 studies, 614 participants), which corresponded to a 8% absolute improvement (95% CI 2% to 19%).Low quality evidence (downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision) indicated that there was a greater risk of developing serious adverse events with tramadol alone compared to placebo (110/2459 participants with tramadol compared to 22/1153 participants with placebo; RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.84; 7 studies, 3612 participants), which corresponded to a 1% increase (95% CI 0% to 4%). There were no serious adverse events reported in one small study (15 participants) of tramadol with acetaminophen compared to placebo.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Moderate quality evidence indicates that compared to placebo, tramadol alone or in combination with acetaminophen probably has no important benefit on mean pain or function in people with osteoarthritis, although slightly more people in the tramadol group report an important improvement (defined as 20% or more). Moderate quality evidence shows that adverse events probably cause substantially more participants to stop taking tramadol. The increase in serious adverse events with tramadol is less certain, due to the small number of events.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31132298
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005522.pub3
pmc: PMC6536297
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal 0
Tramadol 39J1LGJ30J

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

CD005522

Commentaires et corrections

Type : UpdateOf

Références

Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Jul;42(7):1370-7
pubmed: 10403264
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Autumn;7 Suppl A:4A-16A
pubmed: 11011110
Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Sep;43(9):1905-15
pubmed: 11014340
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1996 Dec;4(4):217-43
pubmed: 11048620
Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Dec;59(12):936-44
pubmed: 11087696
Pain. 2001 Mar;91(1-2):23-31
pubmed: 11240075
Med Care. 2001 Oct;39(10):1039-47
pubmed: 11567167
Clin Ther. 2002 Feb;24(2):282-97
pubmed: 11911558
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Apr;41 Supp 1:3-6
pubmed: 12173279
Pain. 2002 Dec;100(3):291-8
pubmed: 12468000
J Rheumatol. 2003 Jul;30(7):1648-54
pubmed: 12858473
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120
Pain Med. 2003 Sep;4(3):277-94
pubmed: 12974827
Int Immunopharmacol. 2003 Dec;3(13-14):1901-8
pubmed: 14636839
J Rheumatol. 2004 Jan;31(1):150-6
pubmed: 14705234
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Aug;63(8):901-7
pubmed: 15020311
Inflammopharmacology. 2004;12(1):3-31
pubmed: 15035776
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jan;64(1):29-33
pubmed: 15208174
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Jul;28(1):59-71
pubmed: 15223085
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Oct;(427 Suppl):S6-15
pubmed: 15480076
Pain. 2004 Dec;112(3):372-80
pubmed: 15561393
BMJ. 2004 Dec 4;329(7478):1317
pubmed: 15561731
Clin Ther. 2004 Nov;26(11):1774-82
pubmed: 15639689
Lancet. 2005 Mar 12-18;365(9463):965-73
pubmed: 15766999
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD004257
pubmed: 16437479
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Mar-Apr;4(2):104-8
pubmed: 16569712
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 May;31(5):465-76
pubmed: 16716877
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Jul;22(7):1391-401
pubmed: 16834838
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD005522
pubmed: 16856101
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Aug;20(4):721-40
pubmed: 16979535
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Nov;85(11 Suppl):S15-28; quiz S29-31
pubmed: 17079975
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Aug;15(8):957-65
pubmed: 17398122
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jul;23(7):1615-26
pubmed: 17559754
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Sep;34(3):328-38
pubmed: 17583466
JAMA. 2007 Jul 25;298(4):430-7
pubmed: 17652297
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Oct;23(10):2531-42
pubmed: 17825129
Clin Ther. 2007 Jul;29(7):1381-9
pubmed: 17825689
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan;58(1):26-35
pubmed: 18163497
Clin Ther. 2007;29 Suppl:2520-35
pubmed: 18164919
J Opioid Manag. 2007 Sep-Oct;3(5):273-80
pubmed: 18181382
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Feb;16(2):137-62
pubmed: 18279766
Minerva Anestesiol. 2008 Mar;74(3):63-8
pubmed: 18288068
Aust Fam Physician. 2008 Mar;37(3):133-5
pubmed: 18345361
Clin Drug Investig. 1998;16(6):421-9
pubmed: 18370557
Pain Res Manag. 2008 Mar-Apr;13(2):93-102
pubmed: 18443671
Pain Res Manag. 2008 Mar-Apr;13(2):103-10
pubmed: 18443672
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 Aug;9(11):1817-27
pubmed: 18627321
Clin Ther. 2009 Mar;31(3):503-13
pubmed: 19393841
Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 Jul;84(7):602-12
pubmed: 19567714
Pain Med. 2009 Sep;10(6):1001-11
pubmed: 19671089
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 May;18(5):646-53
pubmed: 20175977
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Dec;25(8):1246-9
pubmed: 20178889
Am J Ther. 2011 May;18(3):216-26
pubmed: 20215961
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Apr;92(4):990-3
pubmed: 20360527
Pain Pract. 2010 Nov-Dec;10(6):540-7
pubmed: 21040441
Clin Rheumatol. 2012 Feb;31(2):317-23
pubmed: 21811797
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Apr;64(4):465-74
pubmed: 22563589
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2197-223
pubmed: 23245608
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013 Sep;21(9):571-6
pubmed: 23996988
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1323-30
pubmed: 24553908
Yonsei Med J. 2014 Sep;55(5):1379-85
pubmed: 25048500
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Feb;45(4 Suppl):S22-7
pubmed: 26806184
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 29;375(26):2519-29
pubmed: 27959716
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
pubmed: 3802833
Pain. 1997 Jan;69(1-2):161-9
pubmed: 9060027
J Rheumatol. 1997 Apr;24(4):799-802
pubmed: 9101522

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH