A simple algorithm to predict non-compliance with organ at risk dose-volume constraints when planning intensity modulated post-prostatectomy radiation treatment: 'Why we should put the CART before the horse'.
Algorithms
Cohort Studies
Guideline Adherence
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Organs at Risk
/ radiation effects
Prostatectomy
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
/ methods
Rectum
/ radiation effects
Urinary Bladder
/ radiation effects
intensity-modulated
overlap volume histogram
plan quality
post-prostatectomy
radiotherapy
Journal
Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
ISSN: 1754-9485
Titre abrégé: J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101469340
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
27
09
2018
accepted:
16
04
2019
pubmed:
29
5
2019
medline:
8
2
2020
entrez:
29
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is not always apparent when the optimal IMRT/VMAT plan for post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (PPRT) has been achieved. Individual variation in patient anatomy is a key contributor. This study aimed to create a model to determine the probability of rectum and/or bladder doses exceeding planning goals based on individual patient anatomy prior to planning. The IMRT/VMAT PPRT plans from 200 men were randomly and evenly allocated into the Training Cohort and the Validation Cohort. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the Training Cohort identified variables which impacted bladder and rectal doses. Significant variables were included in a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis. The resultant algorithm was then applied to the Validation Cohort. On multivariate analysis, prescription dose; bladder and rectal volume; lymph node treatment; and percentage of bladder and rectal overlap with the PTV were significant variables. Following CART analysis, the overlap volume (OV) for both rectum (rectum overlap > 20%) and bladder (bladder overlap > 20%) were the key drivers of meeting planning goals. Treatment of pelvic lymph nodes was included as the secondary driving factor for bladder (but not rectal) dose. On application to the Validation Cohort, CART analysis predicted 95% and 87% of patients who would meet bladder and rectal planning goals respectively. A simple algorithm was developed to predict plan quality by using the OV of the bladder and rectum with the PTV. This algorithm may be used a priori to assess the planning process in the context of variable anatomy, and to optimise planning quality and efficiency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31136089
doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12902
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
546-551Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.