Attitudes of blood donors to their sample and data donation for biobanking.
Journal
European journal of human genetics : EJHG
ISSN: 1476-5438
Titre abrégé: Eur J Hum Genet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9302235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2019
11 2019
Historique:
received:
27
11
2018
accepted:
14
05
2019
revised:
23
04
2019
pubmed:
31
5
2019
medline:
21
7
2020
entrez:
1
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Modern biomedical and genetic studies require large study cohorts; blood donors have been suggested to represent an appropriate group for recruiting healthy cohorts. The Blood Service Biobank (BSB) in Finland was recently established to recruit blood donors willing to give broad biobank consent. The aim of the present study is to understand how the blood bank context influences views on donating samples and health data. We organised 61 interviews and 10 group discussions with current and potential blood donors. Using qualitative content analysis, we identified three discussion frameworks that summarise the results. We found that frequent blood donors associated the voluntary act of donation with caring for patients. The blood donation experience was considered to accommodate biobank participation, but also allowed critical observations on the integration of research data collection into blood donation. Research participants identified an important difference between the blood bank and biobank contexts. In the biobank context, the focus shifts from donating blood to patients into donating personal and genetic data for research use. Blood donors' anxiety over data use was balanced with their experience of the trustworthiness of the Blood Service. These experiences indicated that the new biobanking activity could be trusted to a familiar organisation. To build donors' trust, biobanks should invest in their institutional reputation, donor experience and dialogue with donors. These findings can be applied to other institutions that are considering setting up biobanks with broad consent for personal data use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31147625
doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0434-1
pii: 10.1038/s41431-019-0434-1
pmc: PMC6871534
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1659-1667Références
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Jun;68(12):2215-22
pubmed: 19394741
Transfusion. 2018 Jul;58(7):1640-1646
pubmed: 29572859
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2016;12:3
pubmed: 26968989
BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 07;13:114
pubmed: 23388465
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Mar 2;100(3):414-427
pubmed: 28190457
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Dec;65(11):2212-22
pubmed: 17904716
New Genet Soc. 2003 Dec;22(3):229-44
pubmed: 15115024
Transfusion. 2010 Sep;50(9):1943-50
pubmed: 20456705
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Feb;22(1):139-44
pubmed: 20926403
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;25(1):31-36
pubmed: 27703145
Genet Med. 2012 Feb;14(2):229-35
pubmed: 22261752
Sociol Health Illn. 2011 Jul;33(5):792-811
pubmed: 21592141
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Aug;22(8):964-8
pubmed: 24281371
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(1):46-52
pubmed: 19906772
Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Jan;21(1):14-20
pubmed: 22669414
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Aug;162:79-87
pubmed: 27343817
J Law Med Ethics. 2016 Mar;44(1):24-34
pubmed: 27256121
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Jun;21(2):169-179
pubmed: 28875227
Transfusion. 2010 Sep;50(9):1866-9
pubmed: 21050225