Safety of in-hospital insertable cardiac monitor procedures performed outside the traditional settings: results from the Reveal LINQ in-office 2 international study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Attitude of Health Personnel
Australia
Canada
Electrocardiography, Ambulatory
/ instrumentation
Equipment Design
Europe
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Miniaturization
Operative Time
Patient Education as Topic
Patient Safety
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Surgical Procedures, Operative
/ adverse effects
Time Factors
Transducers
Wireless Technology
/ instrumentation
Workflow
Duration
Holding area
Insertable cardiac monitor
Procedure room
Resources
Safety
Journal
BMC cardiovascular disorders
ISSN: 1471-2261
Titre abrégé: BMC Cardiovasc Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 05 2019
31 05 2019
Historique:
received:
19
08
2018
accepted:
17
05
2019
entrez:
2
6
2019
pubmed:
4
6
2019
medline:
19
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Historically, the majority of insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) procedures were performed in the cardiac catheterization (cath) lab, electrophysiology (EP) lab, or operating room (OR). The miniaturization of ICMs allows the procedure to be relocated within the hospital without compromising patient safety. We sought to estimate the rate of untoward events associated with procedures performed within the hospital but outside the traditional settings and to characterize resource utilization, procedure time intervals, and physician experience. The Reveal LINQ in-Office 2 (RIO 2) International study was a single arm, multicenter, prospective study. Patients indicated for an ICM and willing to undergo device insertion outside the cath/EP lab or OR were eligible and followed for 90 days after insertion. A total of 191 patients (45.5% female aged 63.8 ± 26.9 years) underwent successful Reveal LINQ ICM insertion at 17 centers in Europe, Canada and Australia. The median total visit duration was 106 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 55-61). Patient preparation and patient education accounted for 10 min (IQR: 5-20) and 10 min (IQR: 8-15) of total visit duration, respectively. Preparation and education occurred in the procedure room for 90.6 and 60.2% of patients, respectively. There were no untoward events (0.0, 95% CI: 0.0-2.1%) though four patients presented with procedure-related adverse events that did not require invasive intervention. Physicians rated procedure location as convenient or very convenient. The Reveal LINQ™ ICM insertion can be safely and efficiently performed in the hospital outside the cath/EP lab or OR. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02412488 ; registered on April 9, 2015.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Historically, the majority of insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) procedures were performed in the cardiac catheterization (cath) lab, electrophysiology (EP) lab, or operating room (OR). The miniaturization of ICMs allows the procedure to be relocated within the hospital without compromising patient safety. We sought to estimate the rate of untoward events associated with procedures performed within the hospital but outside the traditional settings and to characterize resource utilization, procedure time intervals, and physician experience.
METHODS
The Reveal LINQ in-Office 2 (RIO 2) International study was a single arm, multicenter, prospective study. Patients indicated for an ICM and willing to undergo device insertion outside the cath/EP lab or OR were eligible and followed for 90 days after insertion.
RESULTS
A total of 191 patients (45.5% female aged 63.8 ± 26.9 years) underwent successful Reveal LINQ ICM insertion at 17 centers in Europe, Canada and Australia. The median total visit duration was 106 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 55-61). Patient preparation and patient education accounted for 10 min (IQR: 5-20) and 10 min (IQR: 8-15) of total visit duration, respectively. Preparation and education occurred in the procedure room for 90.6 and 60.2% of patients, respectively. There were no untoward events (0.0, 95% CI: 0.0-2.1%) though four patients presented with procedure-related adverse events that did not require invasive intervention. Physicians rated procedure location as convenient or very convenient.
CONCLUSIONS
The Reveal LINQ™ ICM insertion can be safely and efficiently performed in the hospital outside the cath/EP lab or OR.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02412488 ; registered on April 9, 2015.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31151383
doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1106-3
pii: 10.1186/s12872-019-1106-3
pmc: PMC6545016
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02412488']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
132Références
Europace. 2018 Jun 1;20(6):1050-1057
pubmed: 29016753
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2017 Jul;18(7):550-552
pubmed: 27322402
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Feb;14(2):218-224
pubmed: 27825975
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;223:13-17
pubmed: 27525370
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015 Jan;12(1):7-18
pubmed: 25154970
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017 Nov - Dec;17(6):163-166
pubmed: 29231819
Europace. 2016 Jun;18(6):919-24
pubmed: 26293624
Am Heart J. 2019 Jan;207:76-82
pubmed: 30487072
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Sep;40(9):982-985
pubmed: 28691385
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Dec;38(12):1464-9
pubmed: 26412309
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;241:229-234
pubmed: 28457562