Elevated X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) expression uncovers detrimental prognosis in subgroups of neoadjuvant treated and T-cell rich esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Adenocarcinoma
/ metabolism
Aged
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ metabolism
Esophageal Neoplasms
/ metabolism
Esophagectomy
Female
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Lymph Nodes
/ pathology
Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating
/ metabolism
Male
Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ methods
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
T-Lymphocyte Subsets
/ metabolism
X-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein
/ metabolism
Biomarker of response
EAC
Outcome prediction
XIAP
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 May 2019
31 May 2019
Historique:
received:
19
02
2019
accepted:
16
05
2019
entrez:
2
6
2019
pubmed:
4
6
2019
medline:
21
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Molecular markers predicting survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are rare. Specifically, in favorable oncologic situations, e.g. nodal negativity or major neoadjuvant therapy response, there is a lack of additional risk factors that serve to predict patients' outcome more precisely. This study evaluated X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) as a potential marker improving outcome prediction. Tissue microarrays from 362 patients that were diagnosed with resectable EAC were included in the study. XIAP was stained by immunohistochemistry and correlated to clinical outcome, molecular markers and markers of the cellular tumor microenvironment. XIAP did not impact on overall survival (OS) in the whole study collective. Subgroup analyses stratifying for common genetic markers (TP53, ERBB2, ARID1A/SWI/SNF) did not disclose any impact of XIAP expression on survival. Detailed subgroup analyses of [1] nodal negative patients, [2] highly T-cell infiltrated tumors and [3] therapy responders to neoadjuvant treatment revealed a significant inverse role of high XIAP expression in these specific oncologic situations; elevated XIAP expression detrimentally affected patients' outcome in these subgroups. [1]: OS XIAP low: 202 months (m) vs. XIAP high: 38 m; [2]: OS 116 m vs. 28.2 m; [3]: OS 31 m vs. 4 m). Our data suggest XIAP expression in EAC as a worthy tool to improve outcome prediction in specific oncologic settings that might directly impact on clinical diagnosis and treatment of EAC in the future.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Molecular markers predicting survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are rare. Specifically, in favorable oncologic situations, e.g. nodal negativity or major neoadjuvant therapy response, there is a lack of additional risk factors that serve to predict patients' outcome more precisely. This study evaluated X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) as a potential marker improving outcome prediction.
METHODS
METHODS
Tissue microarrays from 362 patients that were diagnosed with resectable EAC were included in the study. XIAP was stained by immunohistochemistry and correlated to clinical outcome, molecular markers and markers of the cellular tumor microenvironment.
RESULTS
RESULTS
XIAP did not impact on overall survival (OS) in the whole study collective. Subgroup analyses stratifying for common genetic markers (TP53, ERBB2, ARID1A/SWI/SNF) did not disclose any impact of XIAP expression on survival. Detailed subgroup analyses of [1] nodal negative patients, [2] highly T-cell infiltrated tumors and [3] therapy responders to neoadjuvant treatment revealed a significant inverse role of high XIAP expression in these specific oncologic situations; elevated XIAP expression detrimentally affected patients' outcome in these subgroups. [1]: OS XIAP low: 202 months (m) vs. XIAP high: 38 m; [2]: OS 116 m vs. 28.2 m; [3]: OS 31 m vs. 4 m).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our data suggest XIAP expression in EAC as a worthy tool to improve outcome prediction in specific oncologic settings that might directly impact on clinical diagnosis and treatment of EAC in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31151416
doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5722-1
pii: 10.1186/s12885-019-5722-1
pmc: PMC6545033
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
X-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein
0
XIAP protein, human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
531Subventions
Organisme : Köln Fortune Program, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine
ID : 408/2018
Organisme : Deutsche Krebshilfe
ID : 70112113
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : CRU 286
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : CRC1218
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : KA 2853/4-1
Références
J Exp Med. 2003 Jul 21;198(2):341-7
pubmed: 12874265
Ann Surg. 2005 Nov;242(5):684-92
pubmed: 16244542
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 6;355(1):11-20
pubmed: 16822992
Blood. 2006 Nov 15;108(10):3434-40
pubmed: 16868249
EMBO Rep. 2006 Oct;7(10):988-94
pubmed: 17016456
Mol Cell. 2007 Jun 8;26(5):689-702
pubmed: 17560374
Cancer Biol Ther. 2007 Jun;6(6):973-80
pubmed: 17611394
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 25;106(34):14524-9
pubmed: 19667203
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Sep 15;16(18):4496-502
pubmed: 20682709
Methods Mol Biol. 2010;664:1-16
pubmed: 20690047
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012 Feb 01;11(2):109-24
pubmed: 22293567
Cancer Discov. 2012 May;2(5):401-4
pubmed: 22588877
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2074-84
pubmed: 22646630
Sci Signal. 2013 Apr 02;6(269):pl1
pubmed: 23550210
EMBO J. 2014 Oct 1;33(19):2171-87
pubmed: 25056906
Front Oncol. 2014 Jul 28;4:197
pubmed: 25120954
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015 Mar;39:97-105
pubmed: 25545814
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jul;1(4):505-27
pubmed: 26181261
Oncotarget. 2016 Apr 19;7(16):21763-74
pubmed: 26943575
Chirurg. 2016 May;87(5):398-405
pubmed: 27138270
Nature. 2017 Jan 12;541(7636):169-175
pubmed: 28052061
Lancet. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2383-2396
pubmed: 28648400
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 18;8(29):46756-46768
pubmed: 28657901
Mol Cell. 2018 Feb 15;69(4):551-565.e7
pubmed: 29452636
Oncol Lett. 2018 Mar;15(3):3779-3789
pubmed: 29467895
Transl Oncol. 2019 Jan;12(1):154-161
pubmed: 30317074
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):38
pubmed: 30621632