Use of previous-day recalls of physical activity and sedentary behavior in epidemiologic studies: results from four instruments.


Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jun 2019
Historique:
entrez: 5 6 2019
pubmed: 5 6 2019
medline: 14 8 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The last few years have seen renewed interest in use-of-time recalls in epidemiological studies, driven by a focus on the 24-h day [including sleep, sitting, and light physical activity (LPA)] rather than just moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). This paper describes four different computerised use-of-time instruments (ACT24, PAR, MARCA and cpar24) and presents population time-use data from a collective sample of 8286 adults from different population studies conducted in Australia/New Zealand, Germany and the United States. The instruments were developed independently but showed a number of similarities: they were self-administered through the web or used computer-assisted telephone interviews; all captured energy expenditure using variants of the Ainsworth Compendium; each had been validated against criterion measures; and they used a domain structure whereby activities were aggregated under categories such as Personal Care and Work. Estimates of physical activity level (average daily rate of energy expenditure in METs) ranged from 1.53 to 1.78 in the four studies, strikingly similar to population estimates derived from doubly labelled water. There was broad agreement in the amount of time spent in sleep (7.2-8.6 h), MVPA (1.6-3.1 h), personal care (1.6-2.4 h), and transportation (1.1-1.8 h). There were consistent sex differences, with women spending 28-81% more time on chores, 8-40% more time in LPA, and 3-39% less time in MVPA than men. Although there were many similarities between instruments, differences in operationalizing definitions of sedentary behaviour and LPA resulted in substantive differences in the amounts of time reported in sedentary and physically active behaviours. Future research should focus on deriving a core set of basic activities and associated energy expenditure estimates, an agreed classificatory hierarchy for the major behavioural and activity domains, and systems to capture relevant social and environmental contexts.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The last few years have seen renewed interest in use-of-time recalls in epidemiological studies, driven by a focus on the 24-h day [including sleep, sitting, and light physical activity (LPA)] rather than just moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). This paper describes four different computerised use-of-time instruments (ACT24, PAR, MARCA and cpar24) and presents population time-use data from a collective sample of 8286 adults from different population studies conducted in Australia/New Zealand, Germany and the United States.
METHODS METHODS
The instruments were developed independently but showed a number of similarities: they were self-administered through the web or used computer-assisted telephone interviews; all captured energy expenditure using variants of the Ainsworth Compendium; each had been validated against criterion measures; and they used a domain structure whereby activities were aggregated under categories such as Personal Care and Work.
RESULTS RESULTS
Estimates of physical activity level (average daily rate of energy expenditure in METs) ranged from 1.53 to 1.78 in the four studies, strikingly similar to population estimates derived from doubly labelled water. There was broad agreement in the amount of time spent in sleep (7.2-8.6 h), MVPA (1.6-3.1 h), personal care (1.6-2.4 h), and transportation (1.1-1.8 h). There were consistent sex differences, with women spending 28-81% more time on chores, 8-40% more time in LPA, and 3-39% less time in MVPA than men.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Although there were many similarities between instruments, differences in operationalizing definitions of sedentary behaviour and LPA resulted in substantive differences in the amounts of time reported in sedentary and physically active behaviours. Future research should focus on deriving a core set of basic activities and associated energy expenditure estimates, an agreed classificatory hierarchy for the major behavioural and activity domains, and systems to capture relevant social and environmental contexts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31159761
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6763-8
pii: 10.1186/s12889-019-6763-8
pmc: PMC6546619
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

478

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL091024
Pays : United States

Références

J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;8(6):805-13
pubmed: 10495261
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 May;32(5):976-84
pubmed: 10795789
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9 Suppl):S498-504
pubmed: 10993420
Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Jan 15;153(2):172-83
pubmed: 11159163
Br J Sports Med. 2003 Jun;37(3):197-206; discussion 206
pubmed: 12782543
Int J Sports Med. 2003 May;24(4):298-303
pubmed: 12784173
Physiol Rev. 1955 Oct;35(4):801-40
pubmed: 13266530
Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Feb 15;161(4):389-98
pubmed: 15692083
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Jun;37(6):986-94
pubmed: 15947724
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006 May 26;3:10
pubmed: 16725055
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):181-8
pubmed: 18091006
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Feb;87(2):279-91
pubmed: 18258615
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Sep 10;5:45
pubmed: 18782458
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Apr;18(4):1026-32
pubmed: 19336550
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Jun;42(6):1094-102
pubmed: 19997030
Circulation. 2010 Jan 26;121(3):384-91
pubmed: 20065160
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Nov;42(11):2134-40
pubmed: 20386334
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Nov 15;172(10):1199-206
pubmed: 20855469
J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Mar;14(2):143-8
pubmed: 20932797
Health Rep. 2011 Mar;22(1):7-14
pubmed: 21510585
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1575-81
pubmed: 21681120
J Phys Act Health. 2012 Jan;9 Suppl 1:S68-75
pubmed: 22287450
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2012 Jul;40(3):118-26
pubmed: 22653275
Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):219-29
pubmed: 22818936
J Phys Act Health. 2013 May;10(4):504-14
pubmed: 22975460
Metabolism. 2013 Jan;62(1):163-9
pubmed: 22980224
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Jun;45(6):1198-207
pubmed: 23274615
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Aug;45(8):1629-38
pubmed: 23863547
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Feb 03;11:12
pubmed: 24490619
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Oct;46(10):2014-24
pubmed: 24561818
J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Jan;18(1):43-8
pubmed: 24602689
Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 May;29(5):371-82
pubmed: 24840228
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jun 16;106(7):null
pubmed: 24935969
PLoS One. 2015 May 29;10(5):e0126665
pubmed: 26023914
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Nov;12(11):1485-91
pubmed: 26024378
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Dec;49(6):811-21
pubmed: 26215832
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 03;10(12):e0142198
pubmed: 26633807
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 09;15:1218
pubmed: 26646428
J Sports Sci. 2017 Feb;35(3):255-261
pubmed: 27019092
BMJ. 2016 Aug 09;354:i3857
pubmed: 27510511
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Nov;104(5):1424-1432
pubmed: 27707702
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2017 Jan;45(1):48-54
pubmed: 27741022
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Jul;49(7):1473-1481
pubmed: 28240704
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Aug;49(8):1572-1582
pubmed: 28272267
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 30;19(5):e186
pubmed: 28559229
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 10;14(1):75
pubmed: 28599680
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Feb;50(2):266-276
pubmed: 28930863
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Sep;55(3):e61-e69
pubmed: 30031635
Demography. 1988 Nov;25(4):537-52
pubmed: 3267538
Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Nov;122(5):794-804
pubmed: 3876763
Am J Clin Nutr. 1971 Sep;24(9):1113-8
pubmed: 5094483
Am J Clin Nutr. 1983 Mar;37(3):461-7
pubmed: 6829488
Am J Clin Nutr. 1982 Nov;36(5):936-42
pubmed: 7137077
J Chronic Dis. 1978;31(12):741-55
pubmed: 748370
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996 Feb;50(2):72-92
pubmed: 8641250
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 May;30(5):777-81
pubmed: 9588623

Auteurs

Charles E Matthews (CE)

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. charles.matthews2@nih.gov.

David Berrigan (D)

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Beate Fischer (B)

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, DE, Germany.

Sjaan R Gomersall (SR)

School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, AU, Australia.

Andrea Hillreiner (A)

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, DE, Germany.

Youngwon Kim (Y)

Department of Health Kinesiology and Recreation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.

Michael F Leitzmann (MF)

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, DE, Germany.

Pedro Saint-Maurice (P)

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Timothy S Olds (TS)

School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, AU, Australia.

Gregory J Welk (GJ)

Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH