A Multicenter Study of the Causes and Consequences of Optimistic Expectations About Prognosis by Surrogate Decision-Makers in ICUs.
APACHE
Adult
Aged
Communication
Decision Making
Female
Humans
Intensive Care Units
/ statistics & numerical data
Length of Stay
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Optimism
Physicians
/ psychology
Professional-Family Relations
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Proxy
/ psychology
Survival Analysis
United States
Withholding Treatment
/ statistics & numerical data
Journal
Critical care medicine
ISSN: 1530-0293
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0355501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
5
6
2019
medline:
12
5
2020
entrez:
5
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Optimistic expectations about prognosis by surrogate decision-makers in ICUs are common, but there are few data about the causes and clinical consequences. Our objective was to determine the causes of optimistic expectations about prognosis among surrogates and whether it is associated with more use of life support at the end of life. Prospective, multicenter cohort study from 2009 to 2012. Twelve ICUs from multiple regions of the United States. The surrogates and physicians of 275 incapacitated ICU patients at high risk of death. None. Surrogates and physicians completed a validated instrument assessing their prognostic expectations for hospital survival. We determined the proportion of surrogates with optimistic expectations, defined as a prognostic estimate that was at least 20% more optimistic than the physician's, then determined how frequently this arose from surrogates miscomprehending the physicians' prognosis versus holding more hopeful beliefs compared with the physician. We used multivariable regression to examine whether optimistic expectations were associated with length of stay, stratified by survival status, and time to withdrawal of life support among nonsurvivors. Overall, 45% of surrogates (95% CI, 38-51%) held optimistic expectations about prognosis, which arose from a combination of misunderstanding the physician's prognostic expectations and from holding more hopeful beliefs compared with the physician. Optimistic expectations by surrogates were associated with significantly longer duration of ICU treatment among nonsurvivors before death (β coefficient = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.05-0.83; p = 0.027), corresponding to a 56% longer ICU stay. This difference was associated with a significantly longer time to withdrawal of life support among dying patients whose surrogates had optimistic prognostic expectations compared with those who did not (β coefficient = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.16-1.07; p = 0.009). The prevalent optimism about prognosis among surrogates in ICUs arises both from surrogates' miscomprehension of physicians' prognostications and from surrogates holding more hopeful beliefs. This optimism is associated with longer duration of life support at the end of life.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31162200
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003807
pmc: PMC6697218
mid: NIHMS1527408
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1184-1193Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K24 HL148314
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL094553
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 May;48(S1):S70-4
pubmed: 10809459
Crit Care Med. 2000 Aug;28(8):3044-9
pubmed: 10966293
N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 4;346(14):1061-6
pubmed: 11932474
JAMA. 2003 Aug 13;290(6):790-7
pubmed: 12915432
BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):741-4
pubmed: 14512488
Am Psychol. 2003 Sep;58(9):697-720
pubmed: 14584987
Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;32(3):638-43
pubmed: 15090940
Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;32(3):649-54
pubmed: 15090942
Crit Care Med. 2004 May;32(5):1149-54
pubmed: 15190965
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005 Dec;11(6):598-9
pubmed: 16292066
Crit Care Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):878-85
pubmed: 16505667
Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):2341-7
pubmed: 18596630
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan 1;179(1):48-53
pubmed: 18931332
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Dec 16;149(12):861-8
pubmed: 19075205
Chest. 2009 Jul;136(1):110-117
pubmed: 19318665
Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2888-94; quiz 2904
pubmed: 19770733
N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 15;361(16):1529-38
pubmed: 19828530
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 1;362(13):1211-8
pubmed: 20357283
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Oct 1;182(7):905-9
pubmed: 20538959
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 6;156(5):360-6
pubmed: 22393131
Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):2327-34
pubmed: 22635048
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;33(4):357-61
pubmed: 22875381
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Dec;27(12):1657-65
pubmed: 23011253
J Palliat Med. 2013 Mar;16(3):243-9
pubmed: 23368978
J Palliat Med. 2013 Aug;16(8):894-900
pubmed: 23786425
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Apr;175(4):549-56
pubmed: 25642797
J Palliat Med. 2015 Aug;18(8):662-6
pubmed: 25922970
J Clin Oncol. 1989 May;7(5):557-9
pubmed: 2709086
JAMA. 2016 May 17;315(19):2086-94
pubmed: 27187301
JAMA. 2016 Jul 5;316(1):51-62
pubmed: 27380343
JAMA. 2017 Jun 6;317(21):2187-2195
pubmed: 28528347
Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31
pubmed: 4139420
JAMA. 1995 Nov 22-29;274(20):1591-8
pubmed: 7474243
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Mar;149(3 Pt 1):818-24
pubmed: 7509706
Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Dec 1;138(11):923-36
pubmed: 8256780
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Oct;158(4):1163-7
pubmed: 9769276