Adjuvant zoledronic acid and letrozole plus ovarian function suppression in premenopausal breast cancer: HOBOE phase 3 randomised trial.
Adult
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
Aromatase Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Bone Density Conservation Agents
/ adverse effects
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Disease Progression
Disease-Free Survival
Estrogen Antagonists
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Italy
Letrozole
/ adverse effects
Middle Aged
Ovary
/ drug effects
Premenopause
Tamoxifen
/ adverse effects
Time Factors
Triptorelin Pamoate
/ adverse effects
Zoledronic Acid
/ adverse effects
Adjuvant endocrine treatment
Aromatase inhibitors
Breast cancer
Phase 3
Premenopausal patients
Zoledronic acid
Journal
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
28
02
2019
revised:
15
04
2019
accepted:
02
05
2019
pubmed:
6
6
2019
medline:
9
6
2020
entrez:
6
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of the study is to analyse whether letrozole (L) and zoledronic acid plus L (ZL) are more effective than tamoxifen (T) as adjuvant endocrine treatment of premenopausal patients with breast cancer with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumours. In a phase 3 trial, 1065 premenopausal patients with HR + early breast cancer received triptorelin to suppress ovarian function and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to adjuvant T, L or ZL for 5 years. Cancer recurrence, second breast or non-breast cancer and death were considered events for the intention-to-treat disease-free survival (DFS) analysis. With a 64-month median follow-up and 134 reported events, the disease-free rate at 5 years was 85.4%, 93.2% and 93.3% with T, L and ZL, respectively (overall P = 0.008). The hazard ratio for a DFS event was 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.80; P = 0.003) with ZL vs T, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.48 to 1.07; P = 0.06) with L vs T and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.44 to 1.12; P = 0.22) with ZL vs L. With 36 deaths, there was no significant difference in overall survival (P = 0.14). Treatment was stopped for toxicity or refusal in 7.3%, 7.3% and 16.6% patients, and in the safety population, grade 3-4 side-effects were reported in 4.2%, 6.9% and 9.1% patients treated with T, L or ZL, respectively. HOBOE study shows that in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer undergoing ovarian function suppression with triptorelin, ZL significantly improves DFS, while worsening compliance and toxicity, as compared with T. (NCT00412022).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31164265
pii: S0959-8049(19)30297-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.004
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Aromatase Inhibitors
0
Bone Density Conservation Agents
0
Estrogen Antagonists
0
Triptorelin Pamoate
08AN7WA2G0
Tamoxifen
094ZI81Y45
Zoledronic Acid
6XC1PAD3KF
Letrozole
7LKK855W8I
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00412022']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
178-186Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.