[Importance of adequate pressure in compression therapy : Basis for successful treatment].
Bedeutung des adäquaten Drucks in der Kompressionstherapie : Basis der erfolgreichen Behandlung.
Bandages
Compression stockings
Edema
Hemodynamics
Posture
Journal
Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete
ISSN: 1432-1173
Titre abrégé: Hautarzt
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0372755
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
6
6
2019
medline:
8
10
2019
entrez:
6
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The pressure exerted by a compression device on a part of the body corresponds to the dosage of the compression therapy. Therefore, the pressure course under compression materials should be investigated in different clinical situations. Pressure measurements were carried out under different compression materials in lying, standing and walking positions within the framework of training, self-experimentation and in patients with venous leg ulcers. The results showed that the pressure varied considerably depending on the material used, the firmness of application, the local configuration (body position) and the time interval between applications. A loss of pressure occurred under each compression therapy, especially under inelastic short-stretch material, mainly due to movement and edema reduction. This pressure loss is decisive for the timing of dressing changes and a reason for the good tolerance of high-pressure levels in mobile patients. Low pressures are particularly suitable for edema reduction. Hemodynamic effects require higher pressures (60-80 mmHg). For this purpose, inelastic materials are preferred which enable lower pressures when lying down (40-60 mmHg). As compression bandages are too loosely applied by many users, pressure indicators on bandages or adaptive bandages with templates are helpful to apply the material with the correct pressure. As a consequence of these findings it is postulated that, at least in studies comparing different compression media, pressure measurements should be carried out in the future, whereby the measuring point and body position should be documented.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The pressure exerted by a compression device on a part of the body corresponds to the dosage of the compression therapy. Therefore, the pressure course under compression materials should be investigated in different clinical situations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
METHODS
Pressure measurements were carried out under different compression materials in lying, standing and walking positions within the framework of training, self-experimentation and in patients with venous leg ulcers.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The results showed that the pressure varied considerably depending on the material used, the firmness of application, the local configuration (body position) and the time interval between applications. A loss of pressure occurred under each compression therapy, especially under inelastic short-stretch material, mainly due to movement and edema reduction. This pressure loss is decisive for the timing of dressing changes and a reason for the good tolerance of high-pressure levels in mobile patients.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Low pressures are particularly suitable for edema reduction. Hemodynamic effects require higher pressures (60-80 mmHg). For this purpose, inelastic materials are preferred which enable lower pressures when lying down (40-60 mmHg). As compression bandages are too loosely applied by many users, pressure indicators on bandages or adaptive bandages with templates are helpful to apply the material with the correct pressure. As a consequence of these findings it is postulated that, at least in studies comparing different compression media, pressure measurements should be carried out in the future, whereby the measuring point and body position should be documented.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31165190
doi: 10.1007/s00105-019-4413-9
pii: 10.1007/s00105-019-4413-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
707-714Références
Dermatol Surg. 2004 May;30(5):737-43; discussion 743
pubmed: 15099316
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Oct;42(4):734-8
pubmed: 16242562
Dermatol Surg. 2006 Feb;32(2):224-32; discussion 233
pubmed: 16442043
Dermatol Surg. 2008 May;34(5):631-9
pubmed: 18261104
Phlebology. 2008;23(6):287-94
pubmed: 19029009
Br J Nurs. 2008 Nov 13-26;17(20):S16-24
pubmed: 19043323
J Wound Care. 2009 Nov;18(11):474, 476-80
pubmed: 19901877
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):925-31
pubmed: 20620002
Int Angiol. 2010 Oct;29(5):408-10
pubmed: 20924342
Int Angiol. 2010 Oct;29(5):426-30
pubmed: 20924346
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jan;55(1):122-8
pubmed: 21944912
Phlebology. 2012 Sep;27(6):289-96
pubmed: 22090466
Int Angiol. 2011 Dec;30(6):527-33
pubmed: 22233613
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Sep;44(3):332-6
pubmed: 22819741
JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Jul;150(7):730-6
pubmed: 24828149
Phlebology. 2014 May 19;29(1 suppl):140-145
pubmed: 24843100
Microvasc Res. 2014 Nov;96:46-54
pubmed: 25107458
Dermatology. 2014;229(4):343-52
pubmed: 25412920
Phlebology. 2016 Mar;31(2):101-5
pubmed: 25524903
Int Angiol. 2016 Apr;35(2):122-8
pubmed: 25673312
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2013 Jan;1(1):13-9
pubmed: 26993887
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2018 Oct;113(7):552-559
pubmed: 28078355
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1148-1153
pubmed: 28744967
Phlebology. 2018 Oct;33(9):627-635
pubmed: 29277134
Vasa. 1984;13(1):58-64
pubmed: 6702282