Evaluation of the central pedicled, modified Wise-pattern technique as a standard level II oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: A retrospective clinicopathological study of 190 breast cancer patients.
breast-conserving surgery
oncoplastic surgery
therapeutic mammoplasty
Journal
The breast journal
ISSN: 1524-4741
Titre abrégé: Breast J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9505539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
25
08
2018
revised:
16
12
2018
accepted:
18
12
2018
pubmed:
6
6
2019
medline:
14
4
2020
entrez:
6
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Involving 207 breast cancer patients a retrospective study was performed to facilitate the acceptance of the central pedicled, modified Wise-pattern therapeutic mammoplasty technique as a standard volume-displacement level II oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS). The overall local recurrence rate was 5.8% with an average follow-up of 43.9 months. The median time to the initiation of the adjuvant treatment was 4.9 weeks. Due to positive surgical margins, 13 (6.84%) completional surgeries were performed. In total, 45 complications (12.9%) were recorded. The median values of the esthetic outcomes represented improved cosmetic results. The modified Wise-pattern technique could be a standard, safe and repeatable level II volume-displacement OBCS.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
922-926Informations de copyright
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
Gulyás-Kásler M. Az emlőrák korszerű sebészete. Medicina könyvkiadó. 2015;1:212-214.
Würinger E, Mader N, Posch E, Holle J. Nerve and vessel supplying ligamentous suspension of the mammary gland. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(6):1486-1493.
Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati IM. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(5):1375-1391.
https://www.esmo.org/Guidelines/Breast-Cancer
Cardoso JS, Cardoso MJ. Towards an intelligent medical system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Artif Intell Med. 2007;40(2):115-126.
Losken A, Styblo TM, Carlson GW, Jones GE, Amerson BJ. Management algorithm and outcome evaluation of partial mastectomy defects treated using reduction or mastopexy techniques. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59(3):235-242.
McIntosh J, O'Donoghue JM. Therapeutic mammaplasty-a systematic review of the evidence. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(3):196-202.
Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Wolfe AJ, Tsangaris TN, Pennanen MF. Experience with reduction mammaplasty combined with breast conservation therapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(3):1102-1109.
Gulcelik MA, Dogan L, Camlibel M, et al. Early complications of a reduction mammoplasty technique in the treatment of macromastia with or without breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2011;11(6):395-399.
Denewer A, Elnahas W, Hussein O, Khater A, El-sadda W, Abouelkher KM. Evaluation of inferior pedicle therapeutic mammoplasty as a primary procedure for upper quadrants early breast cancer. Adv Breast Cancer Res. 2013;2(3):86-90.
Chang E, Johnson N, Webber B, et al. Bilateral reduction mammoplasty in combination with lumpectomy for treatment of breast cancer in patients with macromastia. Am J Surg. 2004;187(5):647-650; discussion 650-1.
Haloua MH, Krekel N, Winters H, et al. A systematic review of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: current weaknesses and future prospects. Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):609-620.
Nos C, Fitoussi A, Bourgeois D, Fourquet A, Salmon RJ, Clough KB. Conservative treatment of lower pole breast cancers by bilateral mammoplasty and radiotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24(6):508-514.