De novo protein design by citizen scientists.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
19
10
2018
accepted:
14
05
2019
pubmed:
7
6
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
entrez:
7
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Online citizen science projects such as GalaxyZoo
Identifiants
pubmed: 31168091
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1274-4
pii: 10.1038/s41586-019-1274-4
pmc: PMC6701466
mid: NIHMS1529304
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
390-394Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P30 GM124169
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UH2 CA203780
Pays : United States
Organisme : Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM120574
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : S10 OD018207
Pays : United States
Références
Lintott, C. J. et al. Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 389, 1179–1189 (2008).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x
Kim, J. S. et al. Space-time wiring specificity supports direction selectivity in the retina. Nature 509, 331–336 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/nature13240
Kawrykow, A. et al. Phylo: a citizen science approach for improving multiple sequence alignment. PLoS ONE 7, e31362 (2012).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031362
Lee, J. et al. RNA design rules from a massive open laboratory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2122–2127 (2014).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313039111
Cooper, S. et al. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature 466, 756–760 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/nature09304
Epstein, C. J., Goldberger, R. F. & Anfinsen, C. B. The genetic control of tertiary protein structure: studies with model systems. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 28, 439–449 (1963).
doi: 10.1101/SQB.1963.028.01.060
Lin, Y.-R. et al. Control over overall shape and size in de novo designed proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E5478–E5485 (2015).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509508112
Huang, P.-S., Boyken, S. E. & Baker, D. The coming of age of de novo protein design. Nature 537, 320–327 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/nature19946
Marcos, E. et al. Principles for designing proteins with cavities formed by curved β sheets. Science 355, 201–206 (2017).
doi: 10.1126/science.aah7389
Dou, J. et al. De novo design of a fluorescence-activating β-barrel. Nature 561, 485–491 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0509-0
Alford, R. F. et al. The Rosetta all-atom energy function for macromolecular modeling and design. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 3031–3048 (2017).
doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00125
Khatib, F. et al. Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1175–1177 (2011).
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2119
Eiben, C. B. et al. Increased Diels–Alderase activity through backbone remodeling guided by Foldit players. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 190–192 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2109
Blout, E. R. & Idelson, M. Compositional effects on the configuration of water-soluble polypeptide copolymers of l-glutamic acid and l–lysine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 4909–4913 (1958).
doi: 10.1021/ja01551a036
Doty, P., Imahori, K. & Klemperer, E. The solution properties and configurations of a polyampholytic polypeptide: copoly-l-lysine-l-glutamic acid. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 44, 424–431 (1958).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.44.5.424
Ghosh, K. & Dill, K. A. Theory for protein folding cooperativity: helix bundles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 2306–2312 (2009).
doi: 10.1021/ja808136x
Rohl, C. A., Strauss, C. E. M., Misura, K. M. S. & Baker, D. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol. 383, 66–93 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(04)83004-0
Koga, N. et al. Principles for designing ideal protein structures. Nature 491, 222–227 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nature11600
Regan, L. & DeGrado, W. F. Characterization of a helical protein designed from first principles. Science 241, 976–978 (1988).
doi: 10.1126/science.3043666
Harbury, P. B., Plecs, J. J., Tidor, B., Alber, T. & Kim, P. S. High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. Science 282, 1462–1467 (1998).
doi: 10.1126/science.282.5393.1462
Thomson, A. R. et al. Computational design of water-soluble α-helical barrels. Science 346, 485–488 (2014).
doi: 10.1126/science.1257452
Jacobs, T. M. et al. Design of structurally distinct proteins using strategies inspired by evolution. Science 352, 687–690 (2016).
doi: 10.1126/science.aad8036
Ramachandran, G. N. & Sasisekharan, V. Conformation of polypeptides and proteins. Adv. Protein Chem. 23, 283–438 (1968).
doi: 10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60402-7
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010).
doi: 10.1107/S0907444909042073
Montelione, G. T. et al. Recommendations of the wwPDB NMR Validation Task Force. Structure 21, 1563–1570 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.07.021
Zhang, Y. & Skolnick, J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 2302–2309 (2005).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gki524
Santoro, M. M. & Bolen, D. W. Unfolding free energy changes determined by the linear extrapolation method. 1. Unfolding of phenylmethanesulfonyl α-chymotrypsin using different denaturants. Biochemistry 27, 8063–8068 (1988).
doi: 10.1021/bi00421a014
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326 (1997).
doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X
McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).
doi: 10.1107/S0021889807021206
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).
doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493
Afonine, P. V. et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. D 68, 352–367 (2012).
doi: 10.1107/S0907444912001308
Jansson, M. et al. High-level production of uniformly
doi: 10.1007/BF00203823
Delaglio, F. et al. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 6, 277–293 (1995).
doi: 10.1007/BF00197809
Bartels, C., Xia, T. H., Billeter, M., Güntert, P. & Wüthrich, K. The program XEASY for computer-supported NMR spectral analysis of biological macromolecules. J. Biomol. NMR 6, 1–10 (1995).
doi: 10.1007/BF00417486
Liu, G. et al. NMR data collection and analysis protocol for high-throughput protein structure determination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10487–10492 (2005).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504338102
Shen, Y., Delaglio, F., Cornilescu, G. & Bax, A. TALOS+: a hybrid method for predicting protein backbone torsion angles from NMR chemical shifts. J. Biomol. NMR 44, 213–223 (2009).
doi: 10.1007/s10858-009-9333-z
Huang, Y. J., Tejero, R., Powers, R. & Montelione, G. T. A topology-constrained distance network algorithm for protein structure determination from NOESY data. Proteins 62, 587–603 (2006).
doi: 10.1002/prot.20820
Güntert, P., Mumenthaler, C. & Wüthrich, K. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 273, 283–298 (1997).
doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1284
Herrmann, T., Güntert, P. & Wüthrich, K. Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 319, 209–227 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00241-3
Huang, Y. J., Powers, R. & Montelione, G. T. Protein NMR recall, precision, and F-measure scores (RPF scores): structure quality assessment measures based on information retrieval statistics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 1665–1674 (2005).
doi: 10.1021/ja047109h
Linge, J. P., Williams, M. A., Spronk, C. A., Bonvin, A. M. & Nilges, M. Refinement of protein structures in explicit solvent. Proteins 50, 496–506 (2003).
doi: 10.1002/prot.10299
Brünger, A. T. et al. Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 54, 905–921 (1998).
doi: 10.1107/S0907444998003254
Lüthy, R., Bowie, J. U. & Eisenberg, D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 356, 83–85 (1992).
doi: 10.1038/356083a0
Sippl, M. J. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 17, 355–362 (1993).
doi: 10.1002/prot.340170404
Laskowski, R. A., Macarthur, M. W., Moss, D. S. & Thornton, J. M. Procheck—a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283–291 (1993).
doi: 10.1107/S0021889892009944
Word, J. M., Bateman, R. C., Jr, Presley, B. K., Lovell, S. C. & Richardson, D. C. Exploring steric constraints on protein mutations using MAGE/PROBE. Protein Sci. 9, 2251–2259 (2000).
doi: 10.1110/ps.9.11.2251
Bhattacharya, A., Tejero, R. & Montelione, G. T. Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia. Proteins 66, 778–795 (2007).
doi: 10.1002/prot.21165
Tejero, R., Snyder, D., Mao, B., Aramini, J. M. & Montelione, G. T. PDBStat: a universal restraint converter and restraint analysis software package for protein NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 56, 337–351 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s10858-013-9753-7
Trifonov, E. N. in Structure and Methods, Vol. 1: The Proceedings of the Sixth Conversation held at The University–SUNY (Adenine, 1990).
Holm, L. & Laakso, L. M. Dali server update. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 (W1), W351–W355 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw357