Multisegmented ankle-foot kinematics during gait initiation in ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability.
Injuries
Joint instability
Mechanics
Walking
Journal
Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
ISSN: 1879-1271
Titre abrégé: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8611877
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
09
11
2018
revised:
09
01
2019
accepted:
08
05
2019
pubmed:
8
6
2019
medline:
9
7
2020
entrez:
8
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Individuals with lateral ankle sprain and chronic ankle instability have impaired postural control and altered motor strategies during walking. However, little is known regarding foot mechanics during gait. The purpose of this study was to compare three-dimensional multisegmented ankle-foot kinematics during stance phase following gait-initiation in acute lateral ankle sprain (Ankle-sprain), chronic ankle instability (Chronic-instability), Coper, and Control groups. 80 recreationally-active individuals (Control: n = 22, Coper: n = 21, Ankle-sprain: n = 17, Chronic-instability: n = 20) participated. Three-dimensional kinematics of the hallux, medial forefoot, lateral forefoot, medial midfoot, lateral midfoot, and rearfoot on shank were collected during the stance phase following gait initiation using an electromagnetic motion capture system. The average joint excursions of 10 steps were normalized to 101 points and analyzed using Statistical Parametric Mapping ANOVA and post hoc t-tests comparing Coper, Ankle-sprain, or Chronic-instability versus Control groups. Secondary analysis was performed comparing Chronic-instability versus Coper groups. The Ankle-sprain group had up to 4.1° more rearfoot inversion during midstance (mean difference: 3.1°) from 42 to 49% of stance phase compared to healthy controls. The Chronic-instability group had up to 5.3° more rearfoot inversion (mean difference: 3.6°) from 34% to 91% of stance phase compared to controls. There were no further statistical differences found between Chronic-instability and Copers, other planes, or segments of the ankle-foot complex. Ankle-sprain and Chronic-instability groups demonstrated more rearfoot inversion compared to controls with no differences in midfoot or forefoot mechanics. Clinicians and researchers should include interventions that control inversion and increase eversion following lateral ankle sprain.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Individuals with lateral ankle sprain and chronic ankle instability have impaired postural control and altered motor strategies during walking. However, little is known regarding foot mechanics during gait. The purpose of this study was to compare three-dimensional multisegmented ankle-foot kinematics during stance phase following gait-initiation in acute lateral ankle sprain (Ankle-sprain), chronic ankle instability (Chronic-instability), Coper, and Control groups.
METHODS
80 recreationally-active individuals (Control: n = 22, Coper: n = 21, Ankle-sprain: n = 17, Chronic-instability: n = 20) participated. Three-dimensional kinematics of the hallux, medial forefoot, lateral forefoot, medial midfoot, lateral midfoot, and rearfoot on shank were collected during the stance phase following gait initiation using an electromagnetic motion capture system. The average joint excursions of 10 steps were normalized to 101 points and analyzed using Statistical Parametric Mapping ANOVA and post hoc t-tests comparing Coper, Ankle-sprain, or Chronic-instability versus Control groups. Secondary analysis was performed comparing Chronic-instability versus Coper groups.
FINDINGS
The Ankle-sprain group had up to 4.1° more rearfoot inversion during midstance (mean difference: 3.1°) from 42 to 49% of stance phase compared to healthy controls. The Chronic-instability group had up to 5.3° more rearfoot inversion (mean difference: 3.6°) from 34% to 91% of stance phase compared to controls. There were no further statistical differences found between Chronic-instability and Copers, other planes, or segments of the ankle-foot complex.
INTERPRETATION
Ankle-sprain and Chronic-instability groups demonstrated more rearfoot inversion compared to controls with no differences in midfoot or forefoot mechanics. Clinicians and researchers should include interventions that control inversion and increase eversion following lateral ankle sprain.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31174142
pii: S0268-0033(18)30945-8
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.05.017
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
80-88Informations de copyright
Published by Elsevier Ltd.