Effects of Age Among Elderly Cancer Patients on Breakthrough Pain Management with Sublingual Fentanyl Tablets.
Journal
Drugs in R&D
ISSN: 1179-6901
Titre abrégé: Drugs R D
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 100883647
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
10
6
2019
medline:
31
1
2020
entrez:
10
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sublingual fentanyl tablets (SFTs) have been shown to be a safe and effective option in controlling breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). However, further examination is required to investigate the use of SFTs among the elderly. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of age in BTcP management with SFTs in the elderly population. We performed subgroup analyses of a recently completed trial in two subsets of individuals: patients aged 65-74 years (low age group) and patients ≥ 75 years (high age group). Pain intensity (PI), onset of pain relief, frequency and duration of BTcP episodes, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at 3, 7, 15, and 30 days. Health status instruments used were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and HADS-D) and the Short Form 12, version 2 (SF-12v2) questionnaire. Levels of PI at the end of the study improved significantly as compared with baseline in both the low and the high age groups (30.0% and 27.7% reduction, respectively). The onset of analgesia at the end of the study began in < 10 min in 85.0% of young-old subjects and in 62.5% of patients ≥ 75 years, but no significant differences were found. BTcP episodes lasted < 15 min in 75.0% of patients in the low age group and 58.3% in the high age group (p = 0.24). Most of patients in both groups experienced one to five BTcP daily episodes, at all assessment points. HADS-D decreased from 10.78 (± 4.33) to 8.21 (± 3.57) in the low age group, and from 10.96 (± 4.26) to 9.36 (± 3.35) in the high age group (p = 0.02). Significant differences in HADS-A scores from baseline to the end of the study were also observed in both subgroups (p < 0.05). Patients in the low age group had less favorable mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) scores than patients in the high age group. At the end of the study, 10.0% of young-old patients and 29.2% of patients aged ≥ 75 years reported AEs related to their treatment. The most commonly reported AEs included nausea, vomiting, constipation, somnolence, and skin disorders and they were generally mild to moderate in severity. The results of this study showed that SFTs provided safe and clinically meaningful pain relief in both elderly subgroups. Clinical implications of these findings await validation in large, confirmatory studies to identify age subgroup divergences among elderly cancer patients treated with SFTs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31177479
doi: 10.1007/s40268-019-0276-x
pii: 10.1007/s40268-019-0276-x
pmc: PMC6738361
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Tablets
0
Fentanyl
UF599785JZ
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
247-254Références
N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 30;341(27):2061-7
pubmed: 10615079
Support Care Cancer. 2000 Mar;8(2):123-30
pubmed: 10739359
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 1;21(7):1383-9
pubmed: 12663731
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15;21(8):1618-23
pubmed: 12697888
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Aug 01;1:29
pubmed: 12914662
Palliat Med. 2004 Apr;18(3):177-83
pubmed: 15198130
Oncology (Williston Park). 2006 Feb;20(2):135-43; discussion 144, 146, 151-2
pubmed: 16562648
Pain. 1990 Jun;41(3):273-81
pubmed: 1697056
Pain Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;8 Suppl 1:S3-7
pubmed: 17280600
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Jun;21(3):217-30
pubmed: 17521291
Drugs Aging. 2007;24(9):761-76
pubmed: 17727305
Eur J Pain. 2009 Apr;13(4):331-8
pubmed: 18707904
Cancer. 2008 Dec 15;113(12 Suppl):3479-83
pubmed: 19058144
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Apr;85(4):431-3
pubmed: 19225449
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Dec;25(12):2877-85
pubmed: 19814586
Palliat Med. 2010 Apr;24(3):286-93
pubmed: 20015921
Drugs. 2010 Dec 3;70(17):2281-8
pubmed: 21080744
Pain Med. 2010 Oct;11(10):1525-36
pubmed: 21199305
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jul;27(7):1385-94
pubmed: 21561313
Ecancermedicalscience. 2012;6:243
pubmed: 22423250
J Pain Res. 2012;5:559-66
pubmed: 23204865
J Aging Stud. 2013 Apr;27(2):159-65
pubmed: 23561281
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jan;47(1):57-76
pubmed: 23796584
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2013;77(1):37-57
pubmed: 23986979
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jul;30(7):1353-6
pubmed: 24625119
Drugs Aging. 2014 Jun;31(6):405-11
pubmed: 24817569
Pain Pract. 2015 Nov;15(8):778-92
pubmed: 25469726
Drugs Aging. 2015 Apr;32(4):315-20
pubmed: 25829295
Clin Drug Investig. 2015 Dec;35(12):815-22
pubmed: 26507617
Perspect Clin Res. 2015 Oct-Dec;6(4):184-9
pubmed: 26623388
Cancer Biol Med. 2015 Dec;12(4):275-83
pubmed: 26779364
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jun;51(6):1070-1090.e9
pubmed: 27112310
Drugs R D. 2017 Sep;17(3):419-425
pubmed: 28744772
Drugs R D. 2018 Jun;18(2):119-128
pubmed: 29572732
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Jul-Sep;5(3):248-253
pubmed: 29963586
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Pediatrics. 1997 Jul;100(1):143-52
pubmed: 9229706