Primary cementless stems in septic hip revision: Indications and results.
cementless stem
complication
outcome
periprosthetic joint infection
total hip arthroplasty
treatment
two-stage hip revision
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)
ISSN: 2309-4990
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9440382
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
11
6
2019
pubmed:
11
6
2019
medline:
14
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of our work is to evaluate results obtained from a cohort of patients affected by periprosthetic joint infection and treated with a primary cementless stem in a two-stage technique framework. Eighty-four patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 37.4 months. The main demographic, surgical, clinical, and radiographic data were recorded. A femoral window for stem removal was performed in 33 patients. Statistically significant improvement was noted for both the Harris Hip score and the Oxford Hip score. Postsurgical complications included thigh pain in three patients, subsidence (>2 mm) in one patient, implant dislocation in two patients, cup revision in one patient, implant revision for septic failure in two patients, and stem revision for varus position in one patient. The stem survivorship rate was 96.3%. There were no significant differences between the groups in which a cortical window was created or not. Femoral stem revision with primary cementless stems is a viable option in selected patients undergoing two-stage hip revision surgery. Correct indication is a cornerstone of good outcome. The use of a cortical window does not affect the final outcome or implant survivorship rate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31177970
doi: 10.1177/2309499019853999
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM