Forward- and Inverse-Planned Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in the CHHiP Trial: A Comparison of Dosimetry and Normal Tissue Toxicity.

DVH forward planning intensity-modulated radiotherapy inverse planning prostate cancer toxicity

Journal

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2019
Historique:
received: 05 02 2019
revised: 21 03 2019
accepted: 27 03 2019
pubmed: 11 6 2019
medline: 14 5 2020
entrez: 11 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The CHHiP (Conventional or Hypofractionated High-dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy In Prostate Cancer; CRUK/06/016) trial investigated hypofractionated radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Forward- (FP) or inverse-planned (IP) intensity-modulated techniques were permitted. Dose-volume histogram and toxicity data were compared to explore the effects of planning method. In total, 337 participants with intermediate-risk disease and prospectively collected toxicity data were included. Patients were matched on prostate and rectum/bladder volumes and on radiotherapy dose for toxicity comparisons. The primary outcome was grade 2 or higher Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) bowel or bladder toxicity at 2 years. IP patients had smaller volumes of rectum irradiated to 50-70 Gy (P < 0.001); FP patients had smaller volumes of bladder irradiated to 74 Gy (P = 0.001). Acute grade 2 + bowel toxicity was worse with FP (27/53 [52%]; 11/53 [21%] IP; P = 0.0002); with no significant differences in acute urinary toxicity. At 2 years, RTOG grade 2 + bowel toxicity rates were FP 0/53 and IP 2/53 and RTOG grade 2 + bladder rates were FP 0/54 and IP 1/57. Significant differences were found between dose-volume histograms from FP and IP methods. IP may result in small reductions in acute bowel toxicity but both techniques were associated with low rates of late radiotherapy side-effects.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31178346
pii: S0936-6555(19)30194-3
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.05.002
pmc: PMC6688097
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

600-610

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1491/A15955
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 12518
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C46/A2131
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1491/A9895
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 7253
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C46/A10588
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : SP2312/021
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 10588
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C46/A3976
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Références

Semin Radiat Oncol. 2002 Jul;12(3):229-37
pubmed: 12118388
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Mar 15;55(4):1109-20
pubmed: 12605991
Radiother Oncol. 2003 Feb;66(2):185-95
pubmed: 12648791
Semin Oncol. 2003 Oct;30(5):596-615
pubmed: 14571409
Cancer Radiother. 2004 Apr;8(2):59-69
pubmed: 15063872
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 May 1;59(1):267-84
pubmed: 15093924
Br J Cancer. 2005 Feb 14;92(3):488-98
pubmed: 15685244
Eur J Cancer. 2005 Apr;41(6):908-21
pubmed: 15808957
Radiother Oncol. 2008 Jan;86(1):43-7
pubmed: 18054103
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2008 Feb;20(1):15-21
pubmed: 18054471
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Mar;90(3):400-7
pubmed: 18952309
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3):747-54
pubmed: 19540054
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2010 Oct;22(8):636-42
pubmed: 20667700
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):43-54
pubmed: 22169269
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(4):464-73
pubmed: 24581940
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Mar 1;91(3):595-603
pubmed: 25596108
Cancer. 2015 Jul 15;121(14):2422-30
pubmed: 25847819
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1047-1060
pubmed: 27339115
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987 Jul;13(7):1007-12
pubmed: 3597142
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Sep 30;30(2):323-9
pubmed: 7523343
Radiother Oncol. 1995 Apr;35(1):17-60
pubmed: 7569012
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Mar 30;31(5):1341-6
pubmed: 7713792
Med Care. 1998 Jul;36(7):1002-12
pubmed: 9674618
Lancet. 1999 Jan 23;353(9149):267-72
pubmed: 9929018

Auteurs

O F Naismith (OF)

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

C Griffin (C)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. Electronic address: Clare.Griffin@icr.ac.uk.

I Syndikus (I)

Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.

C South (C)

Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.

H Mayles (H)

Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.

P Mayles (P)

Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.

V Khoo (V)

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

C Scrase (C)

Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, UK.

J Graham (J)

Beacon Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK.

S Hassan (S)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

E Hall (E)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

D P Dearnaley (DP)

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH