Inhibition of Metabolic Shift can Decrease Therapy Resistance in Human High-Grade Glioma Cells.
Combination therapy
Glioma
Metabolic shift
Metabolism
mTORC2
Journal
Pathology oncology research : POR
ISSN: 1532-2807
Titre abrégé: Pathol Oncol Res
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9706087
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
21
05
2019
accepted:
28
05
2019
pubmed:
13
6
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
13
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The high-grade brain malignancy, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), is one of the most aggressive tumours in central nervous system. The developing resistance against recent therapies and the recurrence rate of GBMs are extremely high. In spite several new ongoing trials, GBM therapies could not significantly increase the survival rate of the patients as significantly. The presence of inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity of GBMs arise the problem to find both the pre-existing potential resistant clones and the cellular processes which promote the adaptation mechanisms such as multidrug resistance, stem cell-ness or metabolic alterations, etc. In our work, the in situ metabolic heterogeneity of high-grade human glioblastoma cases were analysed by immunohistochemistry using tissue-microarray. The potential importance of the detected metabolic heterogeneity was tested in three glioma cell lines (grade III-IV) using protein expression analyses (Western blot and WES Simple) and therapeutic drug (temozolomide), metabolic inhibitor treatments (including glutaminase inhibitor) to compare the effects of rapamycin (RAPA) and glutaminase inhibitor combinations in vitro (Alamar Blue and SRB tests). The importance of individual differences and metabolic alterations were observed in mono-therapeutic failures, especially the enhanced Rictor expressions after different mono-treatments in correlation to lower sensitivity (temozolomide, doxycycline, etomoxir, BPTES). RAPA combinations with other metabolic inhibitors were the best strategies except for RAPA+glutaminase inhibitor. These observations underline the importance of multi-targeting metabolic pathways. Finally, our data suggest that the detected metabolic heterogeneity (the high mTORC2 complex activity, enhanced expression of Rictor, p-Akt, p-S6, CPT1A, and LDHA enzymes in glioma cases) and the microenvironmental or treatment induced metabolic shift can be potential targets in combination therapy. Therefore, it should be considered to map tissue heterogeneity and alterations with several cellular metabolism markers in biopsy materials after applying recently available or new treatments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31187466
doi: 10.1007/s12253-019-00677-2
pii: 10.1007/s12253-019-00677-2
pmc: PMC7109188
doi:
Substances chimiques
Enzyme Inhibitors
0
Temozolomide
YF1K15M17Y
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23-33Subventions
Organisme : National Research, Development and Innovation Office
ID : NKFI-FK-128404
Organisme : Hungarian Academy of Sciences
ID : MTA DSc Fellow
Organisme : Higher Education Excellence Program at Semmelweis University
ID : FKIP
Organisme : Hungarian National Talent and National Excellence Programs, New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities
ID : ÚNKP-18-3
Organisme : The Ministry of Human Capacities of Hungary
ID : EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009
Organisme : The Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH)
ID : NVKP_16-1-2016-0004
Références
Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74
pubmed: 21376230
Adv Biol Regul. 2019 May;72:51-62
pubmed: 31010692
Hum Pathol. 2017 Apr;62:66-73
pubmed: 28025080
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Jan;22(1):35-9
pubmed: 25481268
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 20;35(21):2428-2431
pubmed: 28640710
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7748):341-346
pubmed: 30842654
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2019 Apr;39(3):415-434
pubmed: 30771196
Cancer J. 2015 Mar-Apr;21(2):49-55
pubmed: 25815843
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20
pubmed: 27157931
Front Oncol. 2017 Jun 16;7:120
pubmed: 28670569
Cancer Cell Int. 2018 Dec 19;18:211
pubmed: 30574020
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 04;6:22477
pubmed: 26940435
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 2;36(1):74
pubmed: 28578659
Int J Pharm. 2018 Jan 30;536(1):1-10
pubmed: 28887220
Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2017 Aug;1858(8):686-699
pubmed: 28161329
Cell Death Dis. 2018 Feb 14;9(2):228
pubmed: 29445084
Pathol Oncol Res. 2019 Jan;25(1):137-148
pubmed: 29022195
Nat Genet. 2016 Jul;48(7):768-76
pubmed: 27270107
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Jan;19(1):128-137
pubmed: 27502248
Mol Aspects Med. 2017 Jun;55:140-151
pubmed: 28223127
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Aug 01;19(8):1047-1057
pubmed: 28371827
Front Oncol. 2018 Oct 12;8:452
pubmed: 30364293
Nat Commun. 2016 Nov 21;7:13254
pubmed: 27869123
Neuro Oncol. 2016 Feb;18(2):160-72
pubmed: 26180081
Neuropathology. 2019 Feb;39(1):3-13
pubmed: 30609184
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:987495
pubmed: 22701311
Neuro Oncol. 2013 Feb;15(2):242-50
pubmed: 23243055
Neuro Oncol. 2010 Apr;12(4):389-400
pubmed: 20308316
Oncogene. 2017 Apr 20;36(16):2191-2201
pubmed: 27748764
Front Oncol. 2019 Feb 04;9:41
pubmed: 30778375
Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2018 Apr;1869(2):175-188
pubmed: 29378228
Front Oncol. 2018 Oct 15;8:419
pubmed: 30374421
J Neurooncol. 2019 Jun;143(2):241-249
pubmed: 31025274
Cell. 2017 Apr 6;169(2):361-371
pubmed: 28388417
Cancer Cell Int. 2016 May 05;16:36
pubmed: 27158244
Front Oncol. 2017 Dec 11;7:306
pubmed: 29376023
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jan 15;23(2):562-574
pubmed: 27521447
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr 01;3(4):509-515
pubmed: 27893038
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Jan;19(1):43-54
pubmed: 27365097