Revealing the inner workings of the power function algorithm in Charged Aerosol Detection: A simple and effective approach to optimizing power function value for quantitative analysis.

Charged aerosol detection HPLC-CAD analysis Pharmaceutical analysis Power function algorithm Quantitative chromatographic assay

Journal

Journal of chromatography. A
ISSN: 1873-3778
Titre abrégé: J Chromatogr A
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9318488

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 24 02 2019
revised: 30 03 2019
accepted: 08 04 2019
pubmed: 15 6 2019
medline: 8 11 2019
entrez: 15 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In recent years, charged aerosol detection (CAD) has become a valuable tool for fast and efficient quantitative chromatographic analysis of drug substances with weak UV absorption. In analytical method development using CAD, the power function settings available in the instrument software are key for linearization of the signal response with respect to analyte concentration. However, the relatively poor understanding of the power function algorithm has limited a more widespread use of CAD for quantitative assays, especially in the late stage of method validation and GMP laboratories. Herein, we present an approach to understand the inner workings of the power function value (PFV), the PFV optimization algorithm, as well as a method to determine the optimum PFV based on the signals acquired at PFV = 1 (default CAD settings). The exponent and the constant in the PFV equation used for modeling follow a trend as a function of PFV. The CAD signal at any PFV was modeled based on the signal acquired at PFV = 1, the modelling was successful for two analytes at different concentration levels on two different CAD detectors of the same model. This method reveals the functionality of the PFV which substantially simplifies the workflow needed to optimize the detector signal. The accuracy between the experimental and theoretical results showed high correlation and always resulted in the same optimum PFV determined by both ways. The approach described in this investigation simplifies the selection of the optimum PFV at which the signal is more linear, the signal-to-noise is higher, and the area reproducibility is better. The power function algorithm elucidated herein enables determination of optimum PFV from minimal experimental output and excellent overall accuracy. This paper provides an approach that includes no data transformation outside the vendor software, a very important requirement to easily validate and report results in a GMP environment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31196588
pii: S0021-9673(19)30385-1
doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.04.017
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Aerosols 0
Pharmaceutical Preparations 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-7

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Imad A Haidar Ahmad (IA)

Process Research & Development, MRL, Merck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA. Electronic address: imad.haidar.ahmad@merck.com.

Andrei Blasko (A)

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, San Carlos, CA, United States.

James Tam (J)

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, San Carlos, CA, United States.

Narayan Variankaval (N)

Process Research & Development, MRL, Merck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.

Holst M Halsey (HM)

Process Research & Development, MRL, Merck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.

Robert Hartman (R)

Process Research & Development, MRL, Merck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.

Erik L Regalado (EL)

Process Research & Development, MRL, Merck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA. Electronic address: erik.regalado@merck.com.

Articles similaires

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages
Humans Pharmaceutical Preparations Drug Utilization Prescription Drugs
Aerosols Humans Decontamination Air Microbiology Masks

Classifications MeSH