Persistent occiput posterior position and stress distribution in levator ani muscle during vaginal delivery computed by a finite element model.

FEM modeling Levator ani muscle trauma Ogden material model Persistent occiput posterior position Vaginal delivery

Journal

International urogynecology journal
ISSN: 1433-3023
Titre abrégé: Int Urogynecol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101567041

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
received: 22 03 2019
accepted: 22 05 2019
pubmed: 15 6 2019
medline: 24 6 2021
entrez: 15 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Objective of this study was to develop an MRI-based finite element model and simulate a childbirth considering the fetal head position in a persistent occiput posterior position. The model involves the pelvis, fetal head and soft tissues including the levator ani and obturator muscles simulated by the hyperelastic nonlinear Ogden material model. The uniaxial test was measured using pig samples of the levator to determine the material constants. Vaginal deliveries considering two positions of the fetal head were simulated: persistent occiput posterior position and uncomplicated occiput anterior position. The von Mises stress distribution was analyzed. The material constants of the hyperelastic Ogden model were measured for the samples of pig levator ani. The mean values of Ogden parameters were calculated as: μ1 = 8.2 ± 8.9 GPa; μ2 = 21.6 ± 17.3 GPa; α1 = 0.1803 ± 0.1299; α2 = 15.112 ± 3.1704. The results show the significant increase of the von Mises stress in the levator muscle for the case of a persistent occiput posterior position. For the optimal head position, the maximum stress was found in the anteromedial levator portion at station +8 (mean: 44.53 MPa). For the persistent occiput posterior position, the maximum was detected in the distal posteromedial levator portion at station +6 (mean: 120.28 MPa). The fetal head position during vaginal delivery significantly affects the stress distribution in the levator muscle. Considering the persistent occiput posterior position, the stress increases evenly 3.6 times compared with the optimal head position.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31197428
doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03997-8
pii: 10.1007/s00192-019-03997-8
pmc: PMC7306020
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1315-1324

Subventions

Organisme : PROGRES, Charles University
ID : Q34
Pays : International
Organisme : Application of Modern Technologies in Medicine and Industry
ID : CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_048/0007280
Pays : International

Références

Birth. 2010 Mar;37(1):61-71
pubmed: 20402724
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;107(4):837-44
pubmed: 16582120
J Biomech. 2013 May 31;46(9):1477-88
pubmed: 23623312
J Biomech. 2006;39(6):1153-7
pubmed: 16549103
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;101(1):46-53
pubmed: 12517644
J Biomech. 2015 Jun 25;48(9):1600-5
pubmed: 25757665
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jan/Feb;26(1):56-60
pubmed: 30272594
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2011 Jul;10(4):485-94
pubmed: 20734100
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1669-76
pubmed: 15902175
J Biomech. 2012 Feb 2;45(3):455-60
pubmed: 22209507
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 May;104(5):579-85
pubmed: 9166201
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug;199(2):198.e1-5
pubmed: 18513684
BJOG. 2009 Nov;116(12):1657-62
pubmed: 19735376
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;108(4):879-83
pubmed: 17012449
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Feb;28(2):275-284
pubmed: 27562467
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Sep;24(4):425-8
pubmed: 15343598
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Oct;106(4):707-12
pubmed: 16199625
J Biomech. 2014 Jan 22;47(2):583-6
pubmed: 24342498
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jan;25(1):65-71
pubmed: 23835811
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2011 Feb;14(2):205-12
pubmed: 21337226
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;39(4):372-83
pubmed: 22190408
Ann Biomed Eng. 2011 Dec;39(12):2984-97
pubmed: 21947736
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;44(1):82-9
pubmed: 24496823
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;11:163-76
pubmed: 19591614
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;104(1):168-73
pubmed: 15229017
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;113(4):873-80
pubmed: 19305333

Auteurs

Linda Havelková (L)

New Technologies-Research Centre, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 22, Plzeň, Czech Republic.

Ladislav Krofta (L)

Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Podolské nábřeží 157, 14700, Praha, Czech Republic. ladislav.krofta@post.cz.
3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, Praha, Czech Republic. ladislav.krofta@post.cz.

Petra Kochová (P)

European Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 22, Plzeň, Czech Republic.

Václav Liška (V)

European Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 22, Plzeň, Czech Republic.

Vladimír Kališ (V)

Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Lidická 1, Plzeň, Czech Republic.
Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Plzeň, Czech Republic.

Jaroslav Feyereisl (J)

Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Podolské nábřeží 157, 14700, Praha, Czech Republic.
3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, Praha, Czech Republic.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH