Outcomes in surgically resectable oropharynx cancer treated with transoral robotic surgery versus definitive chemoradiation.
Adult
Aged
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
/ drug therapy
Case-Control Studies
Cause of Death
Chemoradiotherapy
/ methods
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Mouth
Multivariate Analysis
Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
/ adverse effects
Neck Dissection
/ methods
Neoplasm Invasiveness
/ pathology
Neoplasm Staging
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Prognosis
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Robotic Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Chemoradiation and intensity modulated radiation therapy
Neck dissection
Oropharyngeal cancer
TORS
Transoral robotic surgery
Journal
American journal of otolaryngology
ISSN: 1532-818X
Titre abrégé: Am J Otolaryngol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8000029
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
01
03
2019
revised:
28
05
2019
accepted:
03
06
2019
pubmed:
16
6
2019
medline:
14
2
2020
entrez:
16
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Optimal treatment strategies for the management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) remain unclear. The objective of this study is to examine the role of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) on functional and treatment outcomes. A retrospective review of patients with OPSCC (tonsil/base of tongue) who underwent TORS with neck dissection± adjuvant therapy between January 2011 to December 2016 were compared to a stage matched cohort of patients treated with primary chemoradiation. Demographic, treatment, and outcome data were collected. 54 patients received primary chemoradiation and 65 patients (surgical group) received TORS ± adjuvant therapy for clinically staged disease meeting study criteria. 25% (N = 17) were treated with surgery alone. The remainder of the surgical group received postoperative radiation (N = 48), half of which received adjuvant chemotherapy (N = 24) in addition to radiation. 63% (N = 41) of the patients did not have risk factors for chemotherapy. No differences in overall or disease free survival were observed with TORS compared to chemoradiation (p = 0.9), although Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was higher in the surgical group (p = 0.01). The strongest predictor of prolonged gastrostomy tube use was not treatment, but rather co-morbidity (p = 0.03), with no significant differences beyond 12 months. Although no significant survival differences were observed across treatment groups, this was maintained despite increased comorbidity index in the surgical patients. Given the ability to de-escalate and/or eliminate adjuvant therapy, particularly in a less healthy population, TORS would appear to be the viable treatment option it has become.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31201038
pii: S0196-0709(19)30186-3
doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.06.001
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
673-677Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.