Radiotherapy Quality Assurance for the CHHiP Trial: Conventional Versus Hypofractionated High-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer.


Journal

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2019
Historique:
received: 24 01 2019
revised: 01 04 2019
accepted: 12 04 2019
pubmed: 16 6 2019
medline: 14 5 2020
entrez: 16 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The CHHiP trial investigated the use of moderate hypofractionation for the treatment of localised prostate cancer using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). A radiotherapy quality assurance programme was developed to assess compliance with treatment protocol and to audit treatment planning and dosimetry of IMRT. This paper considers the outcome and effectiveness of the programme. Quality assurance exercises included a pre-trial process document and planning benchmark cases, prospective case reviews and a dosimetry site visit on-trial and a post-trial feedback questionnaire. In total, 41 centres completed the quality assurance programme (37 UK, four international) between 2005 and 2010. Centres used either forward-planned (field-in-field single phase) or inverse-planned IMRT (25 versus 17). For pre-trial quality assurance exercises, 7/41 (17%) centres had minor deviations in their radiotherapy processes; 45/82 (55%) benchmark plans had minor variations and 17/82 (21%) had major variations. One hundred prospective case reviews were completed for 38 centres. Seventy-one per cent required changes to clinical outlining pre-treatment (primarily prostate apex and base, seminal vesicles and penile bulb). Errors in treatment planning were reduced relative to pre-trial quality assurance results (49% minor and 6% major variations). Dosimetry audits were conducted for 32 centres. Ion chamber dose point measurements were within ±2.5% in the planning target volume and ±8% in the rectum. 28/36 films for combined fields passed gamma criterion 3%/3 mm and 11/15 of IMRT fluence film sets passed gamma criterion 4%/4 mm using a 98% tolerance. Post-trial feedback showed that trial participation was beneficial in evolving clinical practice and that the quality assurance programme helped some centres to implement and audit prostate IMRT. Overall, quality assurance results were satisfactory and the CHHiP quality assurance programme contributed to the success of the trial by auditing radiotherapy treatment planning and protocol compliance. Quality assurance supported the introduction of IMRT in UK centres, giving additional confidence and external review of IMRT where it was a newly adopted technique.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31201110
pii: S0936-6555(19)30201-8
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.05.009
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

611-620

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1491/A15955
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C46/A10588
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 10588
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C8262/A7253
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : CRUK/06/16
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : 12518
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C33589/A19727
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1491/A9895
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : SP2312/021
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

O Naismith (O)

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: Olivia.naismith@rmh.nhs.uk.

H Mayles (H)

Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, Wirral, UK.

M Bidmead (M)

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

C H Clark (CH)

Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.

S Gulliford (S)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

S Hassan (S)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

V Khoo (V)

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

K Roberts (K)

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

C South (C)

Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.

E Hall (E)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

D Dearnaley (D)

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH