Wrist-Sensor Pulse Oximeter Enables Prolonged Patient Monitoring in Chronic Lung Diseases.
Adult
Aged
Chronic Disease
Cigarette Smoking
/ epidemiology
Female
Humans
Lung Diseases
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Ambulatory
/ instrumentation
Oximetry
/ instrumentation
Oxygen
/ blood
Prospective Studies
Skin Pigmentation
Socioeconomic Factors
Walk Test
Wearable Electronic Devices
Wrist
6-min walk test
COPD
Device assessment
Pulse oximetry
Journal
Journal of medical systems
ISSN: 1573-689X
Titre abrégé: J Med Syst
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7806056
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Jun 2019
14 Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
06
03
2018
accepted:
01
05
2019
entrez:
16
6
2019
pubmed:
16
6
2019
medline:
28
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pulse oximetry is an important diagnostic tool in monitoring and treating both in-patients and ambulatory patients. Modern pulse oximeters exploit different body sites (eg fingertip, forehead or earlobe). All those are bulky and uncomfortable, resulting in low patient compliance. Therefore, we evaluated the accuracy and precision of a wrist-sensor pulse oximeter (Oxitone-1000, Oxitone Medical) vs. the traditional fingertip device. Fifteen healthy volunteers and 23 patients were recruited. The patient group included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (N = 8), asthma (N = 6), sarcoidosis (N = 5) and others. Basic demographic data, skin tone type, smoking status and medical history were recorded. Blood oxygen level (SpO2) and pulse-rate values were determined by a non-invasive pulse oximeter (Reference, a conventional FDA-cleared fingertip pulse oximeter) and by Oxitone-1000. All tests were performed in singleton and in a blinded fashion. The measurements were done in sitting and standing positions, as well as after a 6-min walk test. The mean age was 60.4 ± 9.83 years, 55% were male. No significant differences were observed between the wrist-sensor and the traditional fingertip pulse oximeters in all tested parameters. Mean SpO2 was 96.45% vs. 97.18% and the mean pulse was 74.64 vs. 74.6 bpm (Oxitone-1000 vs. Reference, respectively, p < 0.0001). Precision rate was 2.28472% and the accuracy was met (Arms -Root mean-square-error < 3%). The Oxitone-1000 is both accurate and precise for SpO2 and pulse measurements during daily activities of pulmonary patients, and is not inferior to standard devices for spot checking or short period examinations. Its wrist-sensor design is comfortable and provides the advantage of extended use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31201528
doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1317-2
pii: 10.1007/s10916-019-1317-2
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxygen
S88TT14065
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
230Références
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7
pubmed: 12091180
Thorax. 2004 Feb;59 Suppl 1:1-232
pubmed: 15041752
Anesthesiology. 2005 Apr;102(4):715-9
pubmed: 15791098
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD004356
pubmed: 15846710
Respir Med. 2005 Nov;99(11):1386-92
pubmed: 15878655
Chest. 2007 Jan;131(1):20-8
pubmed: 17218552
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Aug 15;176(4):343-9
pubmed: 17446339
Anesth Analg. 2007 Dec;105(6 Suppl):S18-23, tables of contents
pubmed: 18048893
Thorax. 2015 Jun;70 Suppl 1:i1-43
pubmed: 25870317
J Med Eng Technol. 2016;40(1):1-7
pubmed: 26745746
Anesth Analg. 2016 Aug;123(2):338-45
pubmed: 27089002
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 27;375(17):1617-1627
pubmed: 27783918
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Jan 9;17(1):8
pubmed: 28069009
Mil Med. 2017 Mar;182(S1):92-98
pubmed: 28291458
Clin Chem. 2017 Oct;63(10):1653-1654
pubmed: 28588121
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1994 Sep;49(4):348-53
pubmed: 8000421
Thorax. 1997 Aug;52(8):667-8
pubmed: 9337821
Thorax. 1997 Aug;52(8):674-9
pubmed: 9337824