Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study.
Change Management
Colonic Diseases
/ surgery
Digestive System Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Education
/ methods
England
Humans
Needs Assessment
Organizational Innovation
Patient Care Team
/ organization & administration
Procedures and Techniques Utilization
/ organization & administration
Robotic Surgical Procedures
/ statistics & numerical data
Social Perception
Staff Development
/ methods
implementation
realist evaluation
robot-assisted surgery
robotic surgery
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 06 2019
14 06 2019
Historique:
entrez:
17
6
2019
pubmed:
17
6
2019
medline:
4
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To capture stakeholders' theories concerning how and in what contexts robot-assisted surgery becomes integrated into routine practice. A literature review provided tentative theories that were revised through a realist interview study. Literature-based theories were presented to the interviewees, who were asked to describe to what extent and in what ways those theories reflected their experience. Analysis focused on identifying mechanisms through which robot-assisted surgery becomes integrated into practice and contexts in which those mechanisms are triggered. Nine hospitals in England where robot-assisted surgery is used for colorectal operations. Forty-four theatre staff with experience of robot-assisted colorectal surgery, including surgeons, surgical trainees, theatre nurses, operating department practitioners and anaesthetists. Interviewees emphasised the importance of support from hospital management, team leaders and surgical colleagues. Training together as a team was seen as beneficial, increasing trust in each other's knowledge and supporting team bonding, in turn leading to improved teamwork. When first introducing robot-assisted surgery, it is beneficial to have a handpicked dedicated robotic team who are able to quickly gain experience and confidence. A suitably sized operating theatre can reduce operation duration and the risk of de-sterilisation. Motivation among team members to persist with robot-assisted surgery can be achieved without involvement in the initial decision to purchase a robot, but training that enables team members to feel confident as they take on the new tasks is essential. We captured accounts of how robot-assisted surgery has been introduced into a range of hospitals. Using a realist approach, we were also able to capture perceptions of the factors that support and constrain the integration of robot-assisted surgery into routine practice. We have translated these into recommendations that can inform future implementations of robot-assisted surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31203248
pii: bmjopen-2018-028635
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028635
pmc: PMC6589012
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e028635Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 12/5005/04
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_G1002457
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):177-82
pubmed: 17522913
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 May;196(5):784-95
pubmed: 12742213
Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):598-606
pubmed: 21993935
J Urol. 2011 Apr;185(4):1186-7
pubmed: 21334688
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Mar 06;14:112
pubmed: 24602196
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;27(2):233-41
pubmed: 21912876
JAMA Surg. 2014 Aug;149(8):845-51
pubmed: 24990549
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Dec 21;17(47):5214-20
pubmed: 22215947
J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2323-9
pubmed: 16280833
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;117:125-33
pubmed: 25063968
ISRN Surg. 2012;2012:293894
pubmed: 22655207
Int J Med Robot. 2006 Mar;2(1):28-35
pubmed: 17520611
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;54(3):391-411
pubmed: 21857170
Surg Endosc. 2013 Mar;27(3):732-9
pubmed: 23232988
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jun;13(6):614-6
pubmed: 21564472
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Dec;47(12):2162-8
pubmed: 15657669
Implement Sci. 2014 May 02;9:52
pubmed: 24885669
Int J Med Robot. 2010 Dec;6(4):386-93
pubmed: 20687050
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun 09;15:228
pubmed: 26054758
Minerva Chir. 2005 Oct;60(5):401-16
pubmed: 16210989
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jan 25;10:24
pubmed: 20100330
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):196
pubmed: 28288634
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2013 Jan;22(1):143-51, vii
pubmed: 23158090
BMJ. 2013 Dec 19;347:f7470
pubmed: 24355387
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Jan;92(1):5-8
pubmed: 20056045
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Feb;124(2):180-4
pubmed: 22079679
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jul;13(7):811-5
pubmed: 20456462
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2007;10(3):242-9
pubmed: 17519927
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 16;10:49
pubmed: 25885787
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jan;29(1):1-8
pubmed: 24972924