Comparison of a Bridge Immunoassay with Two Bioassays for Thyrotropin Receptor Antibody Detection and Differentiation.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies
/ immunology
Biomarkers
/ blood
Cell Differentiation
Female
Goiter, Nodular
/ blood
Graves Disease
/ blood
Hashimoto Disease
/ blood
Humans
Immunoassay
/ methods
Immunoglobulins, Thyroid-Stimulating
/ blood
Male
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Receptors, Thyrotropin
/ immunology
Thyroid Neoplasms
/ blood
Young Adult
Journal
Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme
ISSN: 1439-4286
Titre abrégé: Horm Metab Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0177722
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
entrez:
18
6
2019
pubmed:
18
6
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A rapid and fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for the detection of thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies (TSHR-Ab) based on a bridge technology was compared with two bioassays that measure either stimulating (TSAb) or blocking (TBAb) antibodies for the detection and differentiation of TSHR-Ab. A total of 229 patients with various thyroid disorders [151 with Graves' disease (GD), 35 with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT), 32 with nodular goiter, and 11 with thyroid cancer] were included. The bridge immunoassay was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (cut-off>0.55 IU/l). TSAb and TBAb were measured with reporter bioassays. Blocking activity was defined as percent inhibition of luciferase expression relative to induction with bovine TSH alone (cut-off>34% inhibition). TSAb was reported as percentage of specimen-to-reference ratio (> 140 SRR%). The 3 TSHR-Ab assays were negative in all patients with benign euthyroid nodular goiter and differentiated thyroid cancer. In contrast, in all patients with GD, irrespective of the disease duration, TSHR-Ab positivity was present in 127 of 151 (84%) and 140 (93%) for the bridge assay and TSAb bioassay, respectively (p<0.001). Fifteen of 151 (10%) GD samples were positive in the TSAb bioassay but negative in the bridge assay. The bridge assay and the TSAb bioassay correlated positively (r=0.39, p<0.0001) in patients with GD. Both assays detected TSHR-Ab in all ten untreated hyperthyroid patients with GD. In GD patients with a duration of less than six months, 27/29 (93%) and 28 (97%) were TSHR-Ab positive with the bridge and TSAb bioassay, respectively. In comparison, TSHR-Ab were present in two of 35 (6%) and five (14%) HT patients with the bridge and TSAb bio-assay, respectively. TSHR blocking antibodies were present in one (3%) patient with HT and in two (1%) patients with GD; these two GD patients were also bridge assay positive but TSAb bioassay negative. In conclusion, the bridge immunoassay and both bioassays are highly sensitive for the detection of TSHR-Ab. The bridge assay is, however, also positive in the presence of TSHR blocking antibodies detected in a TBAb bioassay.
Substances chimiques
Antibodies
0
Biomarkers
0
Immunoglobulins, Thyroid-Stimulating
0
Receptors, Thyrotropin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
341-346Informations de copyright
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
SA, TD, ME, MK, and DH have nothing to disclose. MS received from Siemens honoraria for oral presentations. GJK consults for and the JGU Lab has received research grants from Quidel.