Influence of Molecular Status on Recurrence Site in Patients Treated for a Stage III Colon Cancer: a Post Hoc Analysis of the PETACC-8 Trial.


Journal

Annals of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1534-4681
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9420840

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Historique:
received: 02 03 2019
pubmed: 19 6 2019
medline: 13 2 2020
entrez: 19 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Recurrence patterns in stage III colon cancer (CC) patients according to molecular markers remain unclear. The objective of the study was to assess recurrence patterns according to microsatellite instability (MSI), RAS and BRAF All stage III CC patients from the PETACC-8 randomized trial tested for MSI, RAS and BRAF A total of 1650 patients were included. Recurrence occurred in 434 patients (26.3%). Microsatellite stable (MSS) patients had a significantly higher recurrence rate (27.2% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.02) with a trend to more pulmonary recurrence (28.8% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.06) when compared to MSI patients. MSI patients experienced more regional lymph nodes compared to MSS (12.9% vs. 4%, P = 0.046). In the MSS population, the recurrence rate was significantly higher in RAS (32.2%) or BRAF (32.3%) patients when compared to double wild-type patients (19.9%) (p < 0.001); no preferential site of recurrence was observed according to RAS and BRAF Microsatellite, RAS and BRAF

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Recurrence patterns in stage III colon cancer (CC) patients according to molecular markers remain unclear. The objective of the study was to assess recurrence patterns according to microsatellite instability (MSI), RAS and BRAF
METHODS METHODS
All stage III CC patients from the PETACC-8 randomized trial tested for MSI, RAS and BRAF
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 1650 patients were included. Recurrence occurred in 434 patients (26.3%). Microsatellite stable (MSS) patients had a significantly higher recurrence rate (27.2% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.02) with a trend to more pulmonary recurrence (28.8% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.06) when compared to MSI patients. MSI patients experienced more regional lymph nodes compared to MSS (12.9% vs. 4%, P = 0.046). In the MSS population, the recurrence rate was significantly higher in RAS (32.2%) or BRAF (32.3%) patients when compared to double wild-type patients (19.9%) (p < 0.001); no preferential site of recurrence was observed according to RAS and BRAF
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Microsatellite, RAS and BRAF

Identifiants

pubmed: 31209667
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07513-6
pii: 10.1245/s10434-019-07513-6
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
BRAF protein, human EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf EC 2.7.11.1
ras Proteins EC 3.6.5.2

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3561-3567

Auteurs

M Bruzzi (M)

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France. matthieu.bruzzi@aphp.fr.

E Auclin (E)

Department of Digestive Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Methodological and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit, EA 3181, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.

R Lo Dico (R)

Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Lariboisière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.

T Voron (T)

Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Saint Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

M Karoui (M)

Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris VI University Institute of Cancerology, Paris, France.

E Espin (E)

Department of General Surgery, Hospital Valle de Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

F Cianchi (F)

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

J Weitz (J)

Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

A Buggenhout (A)

Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

R Malafosse (R)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, AP-HP, Boulogne, France.

F Denimal (F)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée, La Roche Sur Yon, France.

K Le Malicot (K)

Statistical Department, Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, EPICAD, INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, Dijon, Dijon, France.

D Vernerey (D)

Methodological and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit, EA 3181, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.

R Douard (R)

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.

J F Emile (JF)

Pathology Department, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, AP-HP, Boulogne, France.

C Lepage (C)

Hepato-Gastroenterology Department, Dijon University Hospital and EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, Dijon, France.

P Laurent-Puig (P)

Department of Biology, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, AP-HP, INSERM-UMR-S1147, Paris, France.

J Taieb (J)

Department of Digestive Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH