The psychological and social impact of self-advocacy group membership on people with intellectual disabilities: A literature review.


Journal

Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID
ISSN: 1468-3148
Titre abrégé: J Appl Res Intellect Disabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9613616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Historique:
received: 13 08 2018
revised: 08 04 2019
accepted: 28 05 2019
pubmed: 19 6 2019
medline: 7 3 2020
entrez: 19 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is no one agreed definition of self-advocacy, but it can be taken to include actions and concepts such as standing up for one's rights and self-determination. A review of studies examining the psychological and social impact of self-advocacy group membership on people with intellectual disabilities was conducted. Systematic searches of electronic databases (PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and ProQuest's Sociology Database), and manual searches of reference lists and citations, identified 12 studies. "Empowerment" and "increased confidence" were frequently reported outcomes. "Belonging," increased opportunities for social connections and changed self-identity were also key themes. Limitations of the review included difficulty categorizing outcomes, and limitations of the evidence base included a lack of quantitative studies. Implications of the review include an observation that the role of self-advocates in the research literature could be extended to the co-construction of research agendas.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
There is no one agreed definition of self-advocacy, but it can be taken to include actions and concepts such as standing up for one's rights and self-determination.
METHOD METHODS
A review of studies examining the psychological and social impact of self-advocacy group membership on people with intellectual disabilities was conducted. Systematic searches of electronic databases (PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and ProQuest's Sociology Database), and manual searches of reference lists and citations, identified 12 studies.
RESULTS RESULTS
"Empowerment" and "increased confidence" were frequently reported outcomes. "Belonging," increased opportunities for social connections and changed self-identity were also key themes.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Limitations of the review included difficulty categorizing outcomes, and limitations of the evidence base included a lack of quantitative studies. Implications of the review include an observation that the role of self-advocates in the research literature could be extended to the co-construction of research agendas.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31210394
doi: 10.1111/jar.12638
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1349-1358

Informations de copyright

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Anderson, S., & Bigby, C. (2017). Self-Advocacy as a means to positive identities for people with intellectual disability:‘we just help them, be them really’. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30(1), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12223
Aspis, S. (2002). Self-advocacy: Vested interests and misunderstandings. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(1), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3156.2002.00158.x
Beart, S., Hardy, G., & Buchan, L. (2004). Changing selves: A grounded theory account of belonging to a self-advocacy group for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(2), 91-100.
Bhavnani, K. K. (1990). What’s power got to do with it? Empowerment and social research. In I. Parker, & J. Shotter (Eds.), Deconstructing Social Psychology. Psychology Press. London, UK: Routledge.
Buchanan, I., & Walmsley, J. (2006). Self-Advocacy in Historical Perspective. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(3), 133-138.
Caldwell, J. (2010). Leadership development of individuals with developmental disabilities in the self-advocacy movement. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(11), 1004-1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01326.x
Campbell, J., & Oliver, M. (1996). Disability politics: Understanding our past, changing our future. London: Routledge.
Clarke, R., Camilleri, K., & Goding, L. (2015). What’s in it for me? The meaning of involvement in a self-advocacy group for six people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 19(3), 230-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629515571646
Clifford, S. (2013). A narrative inquiry of a self-advocacy meeting: Rethinking empowerment from sovereignty to spontaneity. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(3), 1-15.
Crawley, B. (1990). Advocacy as a threat or ally in professional practice. In S. Brown, & G. Wistow (Eds.), The Roles and Tasks of Community Mental Handicap Teams. Aldershot: Avebury, UK.
Dowse, L. (2009). ‘It's like being in a zoo’. Researching with people with intellectual disability. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 9(3), 141-153.
Dybwad, G., & H. A. Bersani (Eds.) (1996). New voices: Self-advocacy by people with disabilities. Brookline, MA: Brookline Books.
Frawley, P., & Bigby, C. (2015). Reflections on being a first generation self-advocate: Belonging, social connections, and doing things that matter. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 40(3), 254-264. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2015.1028910
Gilmartin, A., & Slevin, E. (2010). Being a member of a self-advocacy group: Experiences of intellectually disabled people. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(3), 152-159.
Goodley, D. (1997). Locating self-advocacy in models of disability: Understanding disability in the support of self-advocates with learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 12(3), 367-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599727227
Goodley, D. (2005). Empowerment, self-advocacy and resilience. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4), 333-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629505059267
Kmet, L., Lee, R., & Cook, L. (2004). Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields (pp. 1-22). Edmonton, Canada: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.
Leflot, G., Onghena, P., & Colpin, H. (2010). Teacher-child interactions: Relations with children's self-concept in second grade. Infant and Child Development, 19(4), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.672
Mallander, O., Mineur, T., Henderson, T., & Tideman, M. (2018). Self-advocacy for people with intellectual disability in Sweden - organizational similarities and differences. Disability Studies Quarterly, 38, 1.
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6:AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I
Mcnally, S. (2003). A survey of self-advocacy groups for people with learning disabilities in an English region: Part II. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7(3), 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/14690047030073004
Miller, R. (2015). Changing organisational culture: Another role for self-advocacy? Tizard Learning Disability Review, 20(2), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLDR-08-2014-0026
Mineur, T., Tideman, M., & Mallander, O. (2017). Self-advocacy in Sweden - an analysis of impact on daily life and identity of self-advocates with intellectual disability. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1304513. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2017.1304513
Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (1998). Disabled people and social policy: From exclusion to inclusion. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919275
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33(47), 74.
Tideman, M., & Svensson, O. (2015). Young people with intellectual disability - The role of self-advocacy in a transformed Swedish welfare system. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 10(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v10.25100
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Abery, B. (2013). Self-determination and choice. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51(5), 399-411. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-51.5.399
Zyta, A., & Ćwirynkało, K. (2016). Self-Advocates with intellectual disabilities in Poland and their way to social participation. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Lifelong Education and Leadership for All. ICLEL Conference Proceedings. 2nd International Conference on Lifelong Education and Leadership for All, 674-679

Auteurs

Kristina Fenn (K)

University College London, London, UK.

Katrina Scior (K)

Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH