Value of EEG reactivity for prediction of neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest: Insights from the Parisian registry.
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
/ adverse effects
Coma
/ diagnosis
Cortical Excitability
Electroencephalography
/ methods
Female
France
/ epidemiology
Heart Arrest
/ complications
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nervous System Diseases
/ diagnosis
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Registries
/ statistics & numerical data
Sensitivity and Specificity
Cardiac arrest
Electroencephalography
Persistent coma
Prognosis
Reactivity
Therapeutic hypothermia
Journal
Resuscitation
ISSN: 1873-1570
Titre abrégé: Resuscitation
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0332173
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
05
03
2019
revised:
07
06
2019
accepted:
07
06
2019
pubmed:
19
6
2019
medline:
18
9
2020
entrez:
19
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the predictive value of EEG reactivity assessment and confounders for neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. All consecutive patients admitted in a tertiary cardiac arrest center between 2007 and 2016 still alive 48 h after admission with at least one EEG recorded during coma. EEG reactivity was defined as a reproducible waveform change in amplitude or frequency following standardized stimulation. Each EEG was classified based on American Clinical Neurophysiology Society nomenclatures and classified in highly malignant (including status epilepticus), malignant, or benign EEG. We assessed the predictive values of EEG reactivity and sedation effect for neurologic outcome at ICU discharge using the Cerebral Performance Category scale (with CPC 1-2 assumed as favorable outcome and CPC 3-4-5 considered as poor outcome). Among 428 patients, a poor outcome was observed in 80% patients. The median time to EEG recording was 3 (1-4) days and 51% patients had a non-reactive EEG. The positive predictive value (PPV) of a non-reactive EEG to predict an unfavorable outcome was 97.1% (IC95% 93.6-98.9), increasing to 98.3% (IC95 94.1-99.8) when the EEG had been performed without sedation. In multivariate analysis, a non-reactive EEG was associated with poor outcome (OR 12.6 IC95% 4.7-33.6; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, concomitant sedation was not statistically associated with EEG non-reactivity. The PPV of a benign EEG to predict favorable outcome was 49.7% (IC95% 41.5-57.9), increasing to 66.2% (IC95% 54.3-76.8) when EEG was recorded earlier, with ongoing sedation. After cardiac arrest, absence of EEG reactivity was predictive of unfavorable outcome. By contrast, a benign EEG was slightly predictive of a favorable outcome. Reactivity assessment may have important implications in the neuroprognostication process after cardiac arrest and could be influenced by sedation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31211949
pii: S0300-9572(19)30222-9
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.06.009
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
168-174Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.