Health, pleasure, and fullness: changing mindset affects brain responses and portion size selection in adults with overweight and obesity.
Journal
International journal of obesity (2005)
ISSN: 1476-5497
Titre abrégé: Int J Obes (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101256108
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
received:
10
12
2018
accepted:
01
05
2019
revised:
04
04
2019
pubmed:
20
6
2019
medline:
27
2
2021
entrez:
20
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Increased portion size is an essential contributor to the current obesity epidemic. The decision of how much to eat before a meal begins (i.e. pre-meal planning), and the attention assigned to this task, plays a vital role in our portion control. We investigated whether pre-meal planning can be influenced by a shift in mindset in individuals with overweight and obesity in order to influence portion size selection and brain activity. We investigated the neural underpinnings of pre-meal planning in 36 adults of different weight groups (BMI < 25 kg/m We observed that participants of all weight groups reduced their portion size when adopting a health mindset, which was accompanied by enhanced activation of the self-control network (i.e. left prefrontal cortex). Fullness and pleasure mindsets resulted in contrasting reward responses in individuals with overweight and obesity compared to normal-weight individuals. Under the pleasure mindset, persons with overweight and obesity showed heightened activity in parts of the taste cortex (i.e. right frontal operculum), while the fullness mindset caused reduced activation in the ventral striatum, an important component of the reward system. Moreover, participants with overweight and obesity did not modify their behaviour under the pleasure mindset and selected larger portions than the normal-weight group. We were able to identify specific brain response patterns as participants made a final choice of a portion size. The results demonstrate that different brain responses and behaviours during pre-meal planning can inform the development of effective strategies for healthy weight management.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Increased portion size is an essential contributor to the current obesity epidemic. The decision of how much to eat before a meal begins (i.e. pre-meal planning), and the attention assigned to this task, plays a vital role in our portion control.
OBJECTIVE
We investigated whether pre-meal planning can be influenced by a shift in mindset in individuals with overweight and obesity in order to influence portion size selection and brain activity.
DESIGN
We investigated the neural underpinnings of pre-meal planning in 36 adults of different weight groups (BMI < 25 kg/m
RESULTS
We observed that participants of all weight groups reduced their portion size when adopting a health mindset, which was accompanied by enhanced activation of the self-control network (i.e. left prefrontal cortex). Fullness and pleasure mindsets resulted in contrasting reward responses in individuals with overweight and obesity compared to normal-weight individuals. Under the pleasure mindset, persons with overweight and obesity showed heightened activity in parts of the taste cortex (i.e. right frontal operculum), while the fullness mindset caused reduced activation in the ventral striatum, an important component of the reward system. Moreover, participants with overweight and obesity did not modify their behaviour under the pleasure mindset and selected larger portions than the normal-weight group.
CONCLUSIONS
We were able to identify specific brain response patterns as participants made a final choice of a portion size. The results demonstrate that different brain responses and behaviours during pre-meal planning can inform the development of effective strategies for healthy weight management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31213656
doi: 10.1038/s41366-019-0400-6
pii: 10.1038/s41366-019-0400-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
428-437Références
Bhanji JP, Beer JS. Taking a different perspective: mindset influences neural regions that represent value and choice. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012;7:782–93.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr062
pubmed: 21972426
pmcid: 21972426
Hare TA, Malmaud J, Rangel A. Focusing attention on the health aspects of foods changes value signals in vmPFC and improves dietary choice. J Neurosci. 2011;31:11077–87.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6383-10.2011
pubmed: 21795556
pmcid: 21795556
Spetter MS, Malekshahi R, Birbaumer N, Luhrs M, van der Veer AH, Scheffler K, et al. Volitional regulation of brain responses to food stimuli in overweight and obese subjects: a real-time fMRI feedback study. Appetite. 2017;112:188–95.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.01.032
pubmed: 28131758
pmcid: 28131758
Petit O, Merunka D, Anton JL, Nazarian B, Spence C, Cheok AD, et al. Health and pleasure in consumers’ dietary food choices: individual differences in the brain’s value system. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0156333.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156333
pubmed: 27428267
pmcid: 27428267
Hare TA, Camerer CF, Rangel A. Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science. 2009;324:646–8.
doi: 10.1126/science.1168450
pubmed: 19407204
pmcid: 19407204
Goldman RL, Canterberry M, Borckardt JJ, Madan A, Byrne TK, George MS, et al. Executive control circuitry differentiates degree of success in weight loss following gastric-bypass surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21:2189–96.
doi: 10.1002/oby.20575
Hege MA, Stingl KT, Ketterer C, Haring HU, Heni M, Fritsche A, et al. Working memory-related brain activity is associated with outcome of lifestyle intervention. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21:2488–94.
doi: 10.1002/oby.20442
Han JE, Boachie N, Garcia-Garcia I, Michaud A, Dagher A. Neural correlates of dietary self-control in healthy adults: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Physiol Behav. 2018;192:98–108.
doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.037
pubmed: 29496487
pmcid: 29496487
Brooks SJ, Cedernaes J, Schioth HB. Increased prefrontal and parahippocampal activation with reduced dorsolateral prefrontal and insular cortex activation to food images in obesity: a meta-analysis of fMRI studies. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e60393.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060393
pubmed: 23593210
pmcid: 23593210
Hege MA, Stingl KT, Kullmann S, Schag K, Giel KE, Zipfel S, et al. Attentional impulsivity in binge eating disorder modulates response inhibition performance and frontal brain networks. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015;39:353–60.
doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.99
Brunstrom JM. Mind over platter: pre-meal planning and the control of meal size in humans. Int J Obes (Lond). 2014;38:S9–12.
doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.83
Labbe D, Rytz A, Brunstrom JM, Forde CG, Martin N. Influence of BMI and dietary restraint on self-selected portions of prepared meals in US women. Appetite. 2017;111:203–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.004
pubmed: 27836636
pmcid: 27836636
Fay SH, Ferriday D, Hinton EC, Shakeshaft NG, Rogers PJ, Brunstrom JM. What determines real-world meal size? Evidence for pre-meal planning. Appetite. 2011;56:284–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.006
pubmed: 21232568
pmcid: 21232568
Wilkinson LL, Hinton EC, Fay SH, Ferriday D, Rogers PJ, Brunstrom JM. Computer-based assessments of expected satiety predict behavioural measures of portion-size selection and food intake. Appetite. 2012;59:933–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.09.007
pubmed: 22989621
pmcid: 22989621
Brunstrom JM, Shakeshaft NG. Measuring affective (liking) and non-affective (expected satiety) determinants of portion size and food reward. Appetite. 2009;52:108–14.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.09.002
pubmed: 18831997
pmcid: 18831997
Brunstrom JM, Shakeshaft NG, Scott-Samuel NE. Measuring ‘expected satiety’ in a range of common foods using a method of constant stimuli. Appetite. 2008;51:604–14.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.04.017
pubmed: 18547677
pmcid: 18547677
Hege MA, Veit R, Krumsiek J, Kullmann S, Heni M, Rogers PJ, et al. Eating less or more—mindset induced changes in neural correlates of pre-meal planning. Appetite. 2018;125:492–501.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.03.006
pubmed: 29524474
pmcid: 29524474
Brunstrom JM, Rogers PJ. How many calories are on our plate? Expected fullness, not liking, determines meal-size selection. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17:1884–90.
doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.201
Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Moubarac JC, Levy RB, Louzada MLC, Jaime PC. The UN decade of nutrition, the NOVA food classification and the trouble with ultra-processing. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21:5–17.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000234
pubmed: 28322183
pmcid: 28322183
Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Burdette JH. An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage. 2003;19:1233–9.
doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00169-1
pubmed: 12880848
pmcid: 12880848
Harris JA, Benedict FG. A biometric study of human basal metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1918;4:370–3.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.4.12.370
pubmed: 16576330
pmcid: 16576330
Frank S, Kullmann S, Veit R. Food related processes in the insular cortex. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:499.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00499
pubmed: 23986683
pmcid: 23986683
Amodio DM, Frith CD. Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:268–77.
doi: 10.1038/nrn1884
pubmed: 16552413
pmcid: 16552413
Siep N, Roefs A, Roebroeck A, Havermans R, Bonte M, Jansen A. Fighting food temptations: the modulating effects of short-term cognitive reappraisal, suppression and up-regulation on mesocorticolimbic activity related to appetitive motivation. Neuroimage. 2012;60:213–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.067
pubmed: 22230946
pmcid: 22230946
Yokum S, Stice E. Cognitive regulation of food craving: effects of three cognitive reappraisal strategies on neural response to palatable foods. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37:1565–70.
doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.39
Kumar S, Grundeis F, Brand C, Hwang HJ, Mehnert J, Pleger B. Differences in insula and pre-/frontal responses during reappraisal of food in lean and obese humans. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:233.
pubmed: 27458355
pmcid: 27458355
Stice E, Yokum S, Burger K, Rohde P, Shaw H, Gau JM. A pilot randomized trial of a cognitive reappraisal obesity prevention program. Physiol Behav. 2015;138:124–32.
doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.10.022
pubmed: 25447334
pmcid: 25447334
Kohl SH, Veit R, Spetter MS, Gunther A, Rina A, Luhrs M, et al. Real-time fMRI neurofeedback training to improve eating behavior by self-regulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a randomized controlled trial in overweight and obese subjects. Neuroimage. 2019;191:596–609.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.033
pubmed: 30798010
pmcid: 30798010
Kim SH, Chung JH, Kim TH, Lim SH, Kim Y, Lee YA, et al. The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on eating behaviors and body weight in obesity: a randomized controlled study. Brain Stimul. 2018;11:528–35.
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.020
pubmed: 29326022
pmcid: 29326022
Gluck ME, Viswanath P, Stinson EJ. Obesity, appetite, and the prefrontal cortex. Curr Obes Rep. 2017;6:380–8.
doi: 10.1007/s13679-017-0289-0
pubmed: 29071480
pmcid: 29071480
Heinitz S, Reinhardt M, Piaggi P, Weise CM, Diaz E, Stinson EJ, et al. Neuromodulation directed at the prefrontal cortex of subjects with obesity reduces snack food intake and hunger in a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106:1347–57.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.158089
pubmed: 29046305
pmcid: 29046305
Cornil Y, Chandon P. Pleasure as a substitute for size: how multisensory imagery can make people happier with smaller food portions. J Marketing Res. 2016;53:847–64.
doi: 10.1509/jmr.14.0299
Rogers PJ. Combating excessive eating: a role for four evidence-based remedies. Obesity. 2018;26:S18–S24.
doi: 10.1002/oby.22280
pubmed: 30290075
pmcid: 30290075
Hampshire A, Chamberlain SR, Monti MM, Duncan J, Owen AM. The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control. Neuroimage. 2010;50:1313–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.109
pubmed: 20056157
pmcid: 20056157
Erika-Florence M, Leech R, Hampshire A. A functional network perspective on response inhibition and attentional control. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4073.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms5073
pubmed: 24905116
pmcid: 24905116
Veldhuizen MG, Bender G, Constable RT, Small DM. Trying to detect taste in a tasteless solution: modulation of early gustatory cortex by attention to taste. Chem Senses. 2007;32:569–81.
doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjm025
pubmed: 17495173
pmcid: 17495173
Veldhuizen MG, Gitelman DR, Small DM. An fMRI study of the interactions between the attention and the gustatory networks. Chemosens Percept. 2012;5:117–27.
doi: 10.1007/s12078-012-9122-z
pubmed: 25419265
pmcid: 25419265
Stice E, Yokum S. Relation of neural response to palatable food tastes and images to future weight gain: Using bootstrap sampling to examine replicability of neuroimaging findings. Neuroimage. 2018;183:522–31.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.035
pubmed: 30144570
pmcid: 30144570
Stice E, Spoor S, Bohon C, Veldhuizen MG, Small DM. Relation of reward from food intake and anticipated food intake to obesity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Abnorm Psychol. 2008;117:924–35.
doi: 10.1037/a0013600
pubmed: 19025237
pmcid: 19025237
Ng J, Stice E, Yokum S, Bohon C. An fMRI study of obesity, food reward, and perceived caloric density. Does a low-fat label make food less appealing? Appetite. 2011;57:65–72.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.03.017
pubmed: 21497628
pmcid: 21497628
Knutson B, Greer SM. Anticipatory affect: neural correlates and consequences for choice. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363:3771–86.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0155
pubmed: 18829428
pmcid: 18829428
Simon JJ, Skunde M, Hamze Sinno M, Brockmeyer T, Herpertz SC, Bendszus M, et al. Impaired cross-talk between mesolimbic food reward processing and metabolic signaling predicts body mass index. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:359.
pubmed: 25368558
pmcid: 25368558
van der Laan LN, de Ridder DT, Viergever MA, Smeets PA. The first taste is always with the eyes: a meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues. Neuroimage. 2011;55:296–303.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.055
pubmed: 21111829
pmcid: 21111829
Smeets PA, de Graaf C, Stafleu A, van Osch MJ, Nievelstein RA, van der Grond J. Effect of satiety on brain activation during chocolate tasting in men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83:1297–305.
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/83.6.1297
pubmed: 16762940
pmcid: 16762940
Yousuf M, Heldmann M, Gottlich M, Munte TF, Donamayor N. Neural processing of food and monetary rewards is modulated by metabolic state. Brain Imaging Behav 2017;12:1379–92.
Devoto F, Zapparoli L, Bonandrini R, Berlingeri M, Ferrulli A, Luzi L, et al. Hungry brains: a meta-analytical review of brain activation imaging studies on food perception and appetite in obese individuals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;94:271–85.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.07.017
pubmed: 30071209
pmcid: 30071209
Kroemer NB, Small DM. Fuel not fun: reinterpreting attenuated brain responses to reward in obesity. Physiol Behav. 2016;162:37–45.
doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.020
pubmed: 27085908
pmcid: 27085908
Mathar D, Neumann J, Villringer A, Horstmann A. Failing to learn from negative prediction errors: Obesity is associated with alterations in a fundamental neural learning mechanism. Cortex. 2017;95:222–37.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.022
pubmed: 28917135
pmcid: 28917135
Schultz W. Dopamine reward prediction error coding. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2016;18:23–32.
pubmed: 27069377
pmcid: 27069377
Medic N, Ziauddeen H, Forwood SE, Davies KM, Ahern AL, Jebb SA, et al. The presence of real food usurps hypothetical health value judgment in overweight people. eNeuro. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0025-16.2016 .
Rolls BJ, Roe LS, James BL, Sanchez CE. Does the incorporation of portion-control strategies in a behavioral program improve weight loss in a 1-year randomized controlled trial? Int J Obes (Lond). 2017;41:434–42.
doi: 10.1038/ijo.2016.217