Whole genome sequencing of Asia II 1 species of whitefly reveals that genes involved in virus transmission and insecticide resistance have genetic variances between Asia II 1 and MEAM1 species.


Journal

BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 03 12 2018
accepted: 31 05 2019
entrez: 20 6 2019
pubmed: 20 6 2019
medline: 17 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci) are phloem sap-sucking pests that because of their broad host range and ability to transmit viruses damage crop plants worldwide. B. tabaci are now known to be a complex of cryptic species that differ from each other in many characteristics such as mode of interaction with viruses, invasiveness, and resistance to insecticides. Asia II 1 is an indigenous species found on the Indian sub-continent and south-east Asia while the species named as Middle East Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1), likely originated from the Middle-East and has spread worldwide in recent decades. The purpose of this study is to find genomic differences between these two species. Sequencing of the nuclear genome of Asia II 1 with Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq generated 198.90 million reads that covers 88% of the reference genome. The sequence comparison with MEAM1 identified 2,327,972 SNPs and 202,479 INDELs. In Total, 1294 genes were detected with high impact variants. The functional analysis revealed that some of the genes are involved in virus transmission including 4 genes in Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) transmission, 96 in Tomato crinivirus (ToCV) transmission, and 14 genes in insecticide resistance. These genetic differences between Asia II 1 and MEAM1 may underlie the major biological differences between the two species such as virus transmission, insecticide resistance, and range of host plants. The present study provides new genomic data and information resources for Asia II 1 that will not only contribute to the species delimitation of whitefly, but also help in conceiving future research studies to develop more targeted management strategies against whitefly.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci) are phloem sap-sucking pests that because of their broad host range and ability to transmit viruses damage crop plants worldwide. B. tabaci are now known to be a complex of cryptic species that differ from each other in many characteristics such as mode of interaction with viruses, invasiveness, and resistance to insecticides. Asia II 1 is an indigenous species found on the Indian sub-continent and south-east Asia while the species named as Middle East Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1), likely originated from the Middle-East and has spread worldwide in recent decades. The purpose of this study is to find genomic differences between these two species.
RESULTS RESULTS
Sequencing of the nuclear genome of Asia II 1 with Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq generated 198.90 million reads that covers 88% of the reference genome. The sequence comparison with MEAM1 identified 2,327,972 SNPs and 202,479 INDELs. In Total, 1294 genes were detected with high impact variants. The functional analysis revealed that some of the genes are involved in virus transmission including 4 genes in Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) transmission, 96 in Tomato crinivirus (ToCV) transmission, and 14 genes in insecticide resistance.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
These genetic differences between Asia II 1 and MEAM1 may underlie the major biological differences between the two species such as virus transmission, insecticide resistance, and range of host plants. The present study provides new genomic data and information resources for Asia II 1 that will not only contribute to the species delimitation of whitefly, but also help in conceiving future research studies to develop more targeted management strategies against whitefly.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31215403
doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5877-9
pii: 10.1186/s12864-019-5877-9
pmc: PMC6582559
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

507

Références

Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47:817-44
pubmed: 11729092
Bioinformatics. 2005 Sep 15;21(18):3674-6
pubmed: 16081474
Nat Methods. 2008 Jan;5(1):16-8
pubmed: 18165802
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2008;46:327-59
pubmed: 18680428
Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2009 Mar;2009(3):pdb.prot5177
pubmed: 20147112
Annu Rev Entomol. 2011;56:1-19
pubmed: 20690829
J Virol. 2011 Apr;85(7):3330-40
pubmed: 21270146
Genome Res. 2011 Jun;21(6):974-84
pubmed: 21324876
Fly (Austin). 2012 Apr-Jun;6(2):80-92
pubmed: 22728672
J Virol. 2012 Dec;86(24):13241-52
pubmed: 23015709
Insect Sci. 2013 Dec;20(6):723-33
pubmed: 23955997
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2013 Nov;107(3):343-50
pubmed: 24267696
Pest Manag Sci. 2014 Oct;70(10):1531-7
pubmed: 24535683
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 06;9(8):e104485
pubmed: 25099936
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e108363
pubmed: 25259930
Glycobiology. 2015 Apr;25(4):357-67
pubmed: 25429048
Sci Rep. 2015 May 29;5:10744
pubmed: 26021483
Insects. 2015 Jul 28;6(3):704-15
pubmed: 26463411
J Econ Entomol. 2015 Apr;108(2):405-13
pubmed: 26470151
Ecol Appl. 2015 Sep;25(6):1585-95
pubmed: 26552266
Annu Rev Virol. 2015 Nov;2(1):67-93
pubmed: 26958907
Insect Sci. 2016 Apr;23(2):215-24
pubmed: 27001484
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Apr 21;12(4):e1004873
pubmed: 27100738
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463-7
pubmed: 271968
Viruses. 2016 Jul 22;8(7):
pubmed: 27455309
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 28;6:37806
pubmed: 27892529
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Nov 15;7:1702
pubmed: 27895657
BMC Biol. 2016 Dec 14;14(1):110
pubmed: 27974049
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 18;7:40634
pubmed: 28098188
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 23;7:40803
pubmed: 28112233
BMC Genomics. 2017 May 11;18(1):370
pubmed: 28494755
Viruses. 2017 Sep 24;9(10):
pubmed: 28946649
J Econ Entomol. 2017 Dec 5;110(6):2295-2300
pubmed: 29029216
Virology. 2018 Jan 1;513:52-64
pubmed: 29035786
Virol J. 2018 Jan 16;15(1):14
pubmed: 29338737
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 24;13(1):e0190555
pubmed: 29364919
Phytopathology. 2018 Oct;108(10):1172-1183
pubmed: 29714092
Sci China Life Sci. 2018 Oct;61(10):1254-1265
pubmed: 29785572
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 18;8(1):10886
pubmed: 30022040
FASEB J. 1995 Jun;9(9):726-35
pubmed: 7601337

Auteurs

Sonia Hussain (S)

National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Department of Biotechnology, Pakistan Institute of Engineering & Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilore, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Muhammad Farooq (M)

National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Hassan Jamil Malik (HJ)

National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Department of Biotechnology, Pakistan Institute of Engineering & Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilore, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Imran Amin (I)

National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Brian E Scheffler (BE)

USDA-ARS, Genomics and Bioinformatics Research Unit, 141 Experiment Station Rd., Stoneville, MS, 38776, USA.

Jodi A Scheffler (JA)

USDA-ARS, Crop Genetics Research Unit, 141 Experiment Station Rd, Stoneville, MS, 38776, USA.

Shu-Sheng Liu (SS)

Institute of Insect Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.

Shahid Mansoor (S)

National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad, Pakistan. shahidmansoor7@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH