Corrective biology: psychosomatics in and as neuropsychoanalysis.
Jaak Panksepp
affective neuroscience
interdisciplinarity
psychoanalysis
psychosomatic
Journal
Medical humanities
ISSN: 1473-4265
Titre abrégé: Med Humanit
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100959585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
accepted:
18
02
2019
pubmed:
21
6
2019
medline:
15
1
2020
entrez:
21
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This article analyses how and with what consequences body-mind relations (the sphere of the psychosomatic) are being modelled in the 21st century through considering the interdiscipline of neuropsychoanalysis. The promise of the term psychosomatic lies in its efforts to rework standard, bifurcated models of mind and body: somatic acts are simultaneously psychic acts. But neuropsychoanalysis, as it brings the neurosciences and psychoanalysis together to model an embodied 'MindBrain', ends up evacuating another potent characteristic found in much of the psychosomatic tradition-its refusal to adjudicate, a priori, what counts as the adaptive or well-regulated subject. The psychosomatic problem in psychoanalysis profoundly disturbs everyday models of functionality, adaptation and agency, by positing the psyche as an 'other' of the physiological within the physiological. By contrast, neuropsychoanalysis ends up parsing too easily the healthy from the pathological body, such that it is only the latter that is subject to forces that work against self-preservation and self-regulation. In so doing, neuropsychoanalysis recasts the radical problematic that the psychosomatic installed for psychoanalysis in the direction of a corrective biology. This corrective biology is given form in two ways: (1) through translating the Freudian drive-that unruly and foundational concept which addresses the difficult articulation of soma and psyche-into a series of Basic Emotion Systems modelled by the affective neuroscientist Jaak Panksepp and (2) through resituating and quarantining the troubling, non-adaptive aspects of the Freudian psyche within the domain of addiction. That easy separation between the healthy and the pathological is all too often found in current descriptions of healthcare and patient encounters. The article refuses it and calls for the revivification of other ways of thinking about how human subjects-psychosomatic organisms-find ways to live, and to die.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31217197
pii: medhum-2019-011645
doi: 10.1136/medhum-2019-011645
pmc: PMC6699604
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
152-161Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Apr;156(4):505-24
pubmed: 10200728
Conscious Cogn. 2005 Mar;14(1):30-80
pubmed: 15766890
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Oct;35(9):2000-8
pubmed: 21241736
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan;16(1):6-8
pubmed: 22153583
Science. 2011 Dec 9;334(6061):1358-9
pubmed: 22158811
Brain Sci. 2012 Apr 17;2(2):147-75
pubmed: 24962770
J Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2011 Jun;23(1):59-60
pubmed: 25859896
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 13;7:1459
pubmed: 27790160
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 Oct;1406(1):90-97
pubmed: 28759698
Med Humanit. 2019 Jun;45(2):107-115
pubmed: 31177101
Int J Psychoanal. 1968;49(1):1-18
pubmed: 5656355