On the relevance of EEG resting theta activity for the neurophysiological dynamics underlying motor inhibitory control.
EEG
beamforming
response inhibition
resting state
theta oscillations
Journal
Human brain mapping
ISSN: 1097-0193
Titre abrégé: Hum Brain Mapp
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9419065
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2019
01 10 2019
Historique:
received:
09
04
2019
revised:
27
05
2019
accepted:
09
06
2019
pubmed:
21
6
2019
medline:
14
4
2020
entrez:
21
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The modulation of theta frequency activity plays a major role in inhibitory control processes. However, the relevance of resting theta band activity and of the ability to spontaneously modulate this resting theta activity for neural mechanisms underlying inhibitory control is elusive. Various theoretical conceptions suggest to take these aspects into consideration. In the current study, we examine whether the strength of resting theta band activity or the ability to modulate the resting state theta activity affects response inhibition. We combined EEG-time frequency decomposition and beamforming in a conflict-modulated Go/Nogo task. A sample of N = 66 healthy subjects was investigated. We show that the strength of resting state theta activity modulates the effects of conflicts during motor inhibitory control. Especially when resting theta activity was low, conflicts strongly affected response inhibition performance and total theta band activity during Nogo trials. These effects were associated with theta-related activity differences in the superior (BA7) and inferior parietal cortex (BA40). The results were very specific for total theta band activity since evoked theta activity and measures of intertrial phase coherency (phase-locking factor) were not affected. The data suggest that the strength of resting state theta activity modulates processing of a theta-related alarm or surprise signal during inhibitory control. The ability to voluntarily modulate theta band activity did not affect conflict-modulated inhibitory control. These findings have important implications for approaches aiming to optimize human cognitive control.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31219652
doi: 10.1002/hbm.24699
pmc: PMC6865515
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4253-4265Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : SFB940
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
Biol Psychol. 2013 Jul;93(3):364-72
pubmed: 23570676
Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 May;115:125-132
pubmed: 27264056
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Apr;88(1):1-16
pubmed: 23415793
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Dec 05;8:420
pubmed: 25538585
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 17;110(38):E3660-9
pubmed: 23986499
Neuron. 2017 Dec 20;96(6):1447-1458.e6
pubmed: 29224723
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Feb;18(2):86-100
pubmed: 28003656
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Aug;20(3):403-14
pubmed: 15268918
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Jul;114(7):1194-202
pubmed: 12842715
Neuroethics. 2018;11(3):309-322
pubmed: 30220937
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Sep;22(9):741-744
pubmed: 30122169
Psychophysiology. 1998 Jan;35(1):116-26
pubmed: 9499712
Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Nov;221(8):3949-3961
pubmed: 26543023
Psychol Sci. 2010 Aug;21(8):1184-90
pubmed: 20558751
Neuroimage. 2019 Mar;188:135-144
pubmed: 30517844
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Oct;8(4):397-413
pubmed: 1761706
Brain Res. 2007 May 7;1148:161-9
pubmed: 17362884
Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Dec;122:1-5
pubmed: 28754327
J Neurosci. 2018 Jan 17;38(3):755-764
pubmed: 29167403
Brain Struct Funct. 2015 Nov;220(6):3555-64
pubmed: 25156575
Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep - Oct;10(5):944-951
pubmed: 28624346
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 2;8(1):16235
pubmed: 30390016
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Dec;39(12):5050-5061
pubmed: 30133058
Psychophysiology. 2011 Apr;48(4):462-9
pubmed: 20825580
Neuroimage. 2006 Feb 1;29(3):764-73
pubmed: 16216533
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Mar;87(3):279-88
pubmed: 23073074
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Sep;97(3):171-3
pubmed: 26071227
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68
pubmed: 23020641
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Oct;39(10):4065-4082
pubmed: 29923271
Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 15;55(4):1771-8
pubmed: 21256235
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869
pubmed: 21253357
Prog Neurobiol. 2013 Sep;108:44-79
pubmed: 23856628
Cognition. 2013 May;127(2):264-9
pubmed: 23466640
Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Jan;125(1):124-32
pubmed: 23891195
Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Jul;30(2):318-26
pubmed: 19614982
Neuroimage. 2013 Feb 1;66:9-21
pubmed: 23103687
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Apr;38(4):1941-1951
pubmed: 28045223
J Neurosci. 2007 Oct 17;27(42):11343-53
pubmed: 17942729
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 24;9(4):e96159
pubmed: 24763435
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Dec;110(12):2752-63
pubmed: 24068756
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Feb;10(2):262-8
pubmed: 24795441
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Sep;24(9):2430-5
pubmed: 23588188
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;57(4):457-61
pubmed: 26968314
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Feb 22;11:51
pubmed: 28275344
Neuroimage. 2008 Sep 1;42(3):1244-54
pubmed: 18617422
Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Nov;221(8):4091-4101
pubmed: 26608829
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Dec;135(3):353-9
pubmed: 11146814
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Aug;18(8):414-21
pubmed: 24835663
Psychol Med. 2016 Oct;46(13):2705-16
pubmed: 27425148
Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Jun;28(6):533-42
pubmed: 17427209
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Mar;87(3):217-33
pubmed: 22906815
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):694-9
pubmed: 11209067
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:575-585
pubmed: 28647483
Neuroscience. 2018 May 15;378:155-164
pubmed: 28069531
Neuron. 2007 Jan 4;53(1):9-16
pubmed: 17196526
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Nov;74(2):149-57
pubmed: 19712709
Science. 2016 Apr 8;352(6282):216-20
pubmed: 27124457
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Nov;36(11):4383-93
pubmed: 26354091
Schizophr Bull. 2008 Sep;34(5):907-26
pubmed: 18684772
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Nov;38(11):5681-5690
pubmed: 28782869
Sci Rep. 2016 May 25;6:26289
pubmed: 27222225
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jan;168(1-2):218-29
pubmed: 16044297
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2697-706
pubmed: 19878726
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Oct 1;40(14):4253-4265
pubmed: 31219652
Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 1;89:280-8
pubmed: 24315839
J Neurosci. 2006 Jan 11;26(2):490-501
pubmed: 16407546
Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2008 Sep;38(7):677-85
pubmed: 18720013
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):679-90
pubmed: 21302025
Trends Neurosci. 2014 Sep;37(9):480-90
pubmed: 25034536
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 15;85 Pt 2:873-87
pubmed: 24007804
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):177-85
pubmed: 24440116
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Aug;85(2):135-44
pubmed: 22732350
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:342-349
pubmed: 26596550
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:138-49
pubmed: 23939021
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Sep;37(9):3114-36
pubmed: 27133468
Biol Psychol. 2014 Jan;95:59-69
pubmed: 23499994