Comparison of 30-day postoperative outcomes of open and minimally invasive pyeloplasty utilizing the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database.
Adolescent
Child
Confidence Intervals
Databases, Factual
Female
Humans
Kidney Pelvis
/ pathology
Laparotomy
/ methods
Linear Models
Male
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Multivariate Analysis
Patient Readmission
/ statistics & numerical data
Postoperative Complications
/ diagnosis
Quality Improvement
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Treatment Outcome
Ureteral Obstruction
/ diagnostic imaging
Ureteroscopy
/ adverse effects
Urologic Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
NSQIP
National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
Pediatric database
Pyeloplasty
Journal
Journal of pediatric urology
ISSN: 1873-4898
Titre abrégé: J Pediatr Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101233150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
25
03
2019
accepted:
18
05
2019
pubmed:
24
6
2019
medline:
27
6
2020
entrez:
24
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Open pyeloplasty (OP) has traditionally been the standard for the operative management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. With advances in minimally invasive pyeloplasty (MIP) techniques, it is quickly becoming a popular alternative in both adult and pediatric population. To evaluate the differences in outcomes between MIP and OP for the surgical correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Data were obtained from the pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2012-2017. We identified 1280 patients who underwent MIP and 1190 patients who underwent OP between 2012 and 2017. Propensity score matching was utilized to adjust for baseline differences. Univariate and multivariable regression were performed to assess odds of complications and procedure-related readmission. Patients who underwent OP had a significantly decreased operative time (192.42 vs 142.00 min, p < 0.001) compared to MIP. There was no significant difference in the rates of overall peri-operative complications (3.7% [MIP] vs 2.4% [OP] p = 0.397). On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing OP had a lower risk of procedure-related readmission (odds ratio [OR] 0.404, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.157-0.951, p = 0.046) than MIP. In a multivariable linear regression model, the risk of having any postoperative complication, regardless of surgical approach, decreased with increasing patient age (OR 0.945, 95% CI 0.893-0.996, p = 0.037). Although recent small, retrospective institutional studies have found decreased hospitalization time of MIP as compared to OP, in our large prospective database, we found no such association. While some studies suggest a higher rate of wound complications in the OP group, this was not reproduced in our study as well. MIP was, in fact, associated with higher rate of readmissions as compared to the OP group, which may act as a surrogate of long-term complications in these patients. MIP offers an alternative to OP in the pediatric population with similar rates of peri-operative complications. However, our study shows decreased odds of procedure-related readmission in OP, which may serve as a surrogate for less postoperative complications in these patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31229417
pii: S1477-5131(19)30142-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.05.022
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
355.e1-355.e8Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.