Prevention of parastomal hernia after abdominoperineal excision with a prophylactic three-dimensional funnel mesh.
Abdominoperineal excision
keyhole technique
parastomal hernia
permanent end-colostomy
Journal
Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
ISSN: 1463-1318
Titre abrégé: Colorectal Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883611
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
28
03
2019
accepted:
05
06
2019
pubmed:
24
6
2019
medline:
6
11
2020
entrez:
24
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A prophylactic three-dimensional (3D) funnel mesh using the keyhole technique (intraperitoneal onlay mesh position) in abdominoperineal excision (APR) may significantly decrease the parastomal hernia (PSH) index without increasing morbidity. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to analyse the incidence of PSH and postoperative complications in patients who underwent permanent colostomy with the use of a prophylactic 3D preformed mesh compared with patients without a mesh. Patients who underwent an end-colostomy after APR for primary or recurrent rectal cancer in a colorectal surgery unit were divided into two groups: group 1 without a prophylactic mesh and group 2 with a prophylactic synthetic mesh. The main end-point was to analyse the incidence of PSH after a median follow-up of 2.8 years. One hundred and ten patients (64 in group 1 and 46 in group 2, without significant clinical differences) underwent a permanent colostomy after APR. In group 1 70.3% developed a PSH, compared with 13% in group 2 (P < 0.001). Age (especially for patients ≥ 75 years) represented a significant risk factor for PSH. There were no differences in postoperative complications between the groups. A prophylactic parastomal 3D mesh using the keyhole technique may reduce the incidence of PSH after permanent colostomy without an increase in postoperative complications.
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1326-1334Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Colorectal Disease © 2019 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
Références
Rullier E, Denost Q, Vendrely V, Rullier A, Laurent C. Low rectal cancer: classification and standardization of surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 560-7.
Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 784-93.
Pilgrim CH, McIntyre R, Bailey M. Prospective audit of parastomal hernia: prevalence and associated comorbidities. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 71-6.
Sohn YJ, Moon SM, Shin US, Jee SH. Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2012; 28: 241-6.
Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D et al. Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7: 279-85.
Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, Macdonald L et al. A prospective audit of stomas-analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5: 49-52.
Kald A, Juul KN, Hjortsvang H, Sjödahl RI. Quality of life is impaired in patients with peristomal bulging of a sigmoid colostomy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008; 43: 627-33.
Burns FJ. Complications of colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1970; 13: 448-50.
Shellito PC. Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 1562-72.
Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, Aufenacker TJ et al. Prophylactic mesh placement during formation of an end-colostomy reduces the rate of parastomal hernia: short-term results of the Dutch PREVENT-trial. Ann Surg 2017; 265: 663-9.
Okorji LM, Kasten KR. Diagnosis and management of parastomal hernias. Dis Colon Rectum 2019; 62: 158-62.
De Raet J, Delvaux G, Haentjens P, Van Nieuwenhove Y. Waist circumference is an independent risk factor for the development of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 1806-9.
Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS et al. Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 685-95.
Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H et al. Risk of morbidity, mortality, and recurrence after parastomal hernia repair: a nationwide study. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 1265-72.
Wijeyekoon SP, Gurusamy K, El-Gendy K, Chan CL. Prevention of parastomal herniation with biologic/composite prosthetic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 211: 637-45.
López-Cano M, Pereira Rodríguez JA. Parastomal hernia prevention with mesh in the context of laparoscopic approach: an opinion based on current literature. Front Surg 2018; 5: 19.
López-Cano M, Brandsma HT, Bury K et al. Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia after end colostomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Hernia 2017; 21: 177-89.
López-Cano M, Serra-Aracil X, Mora L et al. Preventing Parastomal Hernia Using a Modified Sugarbaker Technique With Composite Mesh During Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2016; 264: 923-8.
Smietanski M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre JA et al. European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias. Hernia 2014; 18: 1-6.
Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Almillo JM et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Hernia 2018; 22: 183-98.
Jones HG, Rees M, Aboumarzouk OM et al. Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 7: CD008905.
Odensten C, Strigård K, Rutegård J et al. Use of prophylactic mesh when creating a colostomy does not prevent parastomal hernia: a randomized controlled trial-STOMAMESH. Ann Surg 2019; 269: 427-31.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370: 1453-7.
Millan M, Tegido M, Biondo S, García-Granero E. Preoperative stoma siting and education by stomatherapists of colorectal cancer patients: a descriptive study in twelve Spanish colorectal surgical units. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: e88-92.
Cross AJ, Buchwald PL, Frizelle FA, Eglinton TW. Meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 2017; 104: 179-86.
Patel SV, Zhang L, Chadi SA, Wexner SD. Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21: 5-13.
Chapman SJ, Wood B, Drake TM, Young N, Jayne DG. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia. Dis Colon Rectum 2017; 60: 107-15.
Findlay JM, Wood CPJ, Cunningham C. Prophylactic mesh reinforcement of stomas: a cost-effectiveness meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22: 265-70.
Aslam MI, Rubio-Pérez I, Smart NJ, Singh B. A survey on practices for parastomal hernia prevention and repair among ESCP surgeons. Hernia 2019. [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01921-z.
Ihnát P, Tulinský L, Jonszta T, Koscielnik P, Ihnát Rudinská L, Penka I. Parastomal and incisional hernia following laparoscopic/open abdominoperineal resection: is there a real difference? Surg Endosc 2019; 33: 1789-94.
Conde-Muíño R, Díez JL, Martínez A, Huertas F, Segura I, Palma P. Preventing parastomal hernias with systematic intraperitoneal specifically designed mesh. BMC Surg 2017; 17: 41.
Kojima K, Nakamura T, Sato T et al. Risk factors for parastomal hernia after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Asian J Endosc Surg 2017; 10: 276-81.