Using the genetic characteristics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains with decreased susceptibility to cefixime to develop a molecular assay to predict cefixime susceptibility.


Journal

Sexual health
ISSN: 1449-8987
Titre abrégé: Sex Health
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101242667

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2019
Historique:
received: 04 12 2018
accepted: 01 04 2019
pubmed: 25 6 2019
medline: 24 9 2020
entrez: 25 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In the last two decades, gonococcal strains with decreased cefixime susceptibility and cases of clinical treatment failure have been reported worldwide. Gonococcal strains with a cefixime minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥0.12 µg mL-1 are significantly more likely to fail cefixime treatment than strains with an MIC <0.12 µg mL-1. Various researchers have described the molecular characteristics of gonococcal strains with reduced cefixime susceptibility, and many have proposed critical molecular alterations that contribute to this decreased susceptibility. A systematic review of all published articles in PubMed through 1 November 2018 was conducted that report findings on the molecular characteristics and potential mechanisms of resistance for gonococcal strains with decreased cefixime susceptibility. The findings were summarised and suggestions were made for the development of a molecular-based cefixime susceptibility assay. The penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2) encoded by the penA gene is the primary target of cefixime antimicrobial activity. Decreased cefixime susceptibility is conferred by altered penA genes with mosaic substitute sequences from other Neisseria (N.) species (identifiable by alterations at amino acid position 375-377) or by non-mosaic penA genes with at least one of the critical amino acid substitutions at positions 501, 542 and 551. Based on this review of 415 international cefixime decreased susceptible N. gonorrhoeae isolates, the estimated sensitivity for an assay detecting the aforementioned amino acid alterations would be 99.5% (413/415). Targeting mosaic penA and critical amino acid substitutions in non-mosaic penA are necessary and may be sufficient to produce a robust, universal molecular assay to predict cefixime susceptibility.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
In the last two decades, gonococcal strains with decreased cefixime susceptibility and cases of clinical treatment failure have been reported worldwide. Gonococcal strains with a cefixime minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥0.12 µg mL-1 are significantly more likely to fail cefixime treatment than strains with an MIC <0.12 µg mL-1. Various researchers have described the molecular characteristics of gonococcal strains with reduced cefixime susceptibility, and many have proposed critical molecular alterations that contribute to this decreased susceptibility.
METHODS
A systematic review of all published articles in PubMed through 1 November 2018 was conducted that report findings on the molecular characteristics and potential mechanisms of resistance for gonococcal strains with decreased cefixime susceptibility. The findings were summarised and suggestions were made for the development of a molecular-based cefixime susceptibility assay.
RESULTS
The penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP2) encoded by the penA gene is the primary target of cefixime antimicrobial activity. Decreased cefixime susceptibility is conferred by altered penA genes with mosaic substitute sequences from other Neisseria (N.) species (identifiable by alterations at amino acid position 375-377) or by non-mosaic penA genes with at least one of the critical amino acid substitutions at positions 501, 542 and 551. Based on this review of 415 international cefixime decreased susceptible N. gonorrhoeae isolates, the estimated sensitivity for an assay detecting the aforementioned amino acid alterations would be 99.5% (413/415).
CONCLUSIONS
Targeting mosaic penA and critical amino acid substitutions in non-mosaic penA are necessary and may be sufficient to produce a robust, universal molecular assay to predict cefixime susceptibility.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31230613
pii: SH18227
doi: 10.1071/SH18227
pmc: PMC7386398
mid: NIHMS1045249
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
Cefixime 97I1C92E55
Serine-Type D-Ala-D-Ala Carboxypeptidase EC 3.4.16.4
penicillin-binding protein 2, Neisseria gonorrhoeae EC 3.4.16.4

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

488-499

Subventions

Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R21 AI117256
Pays : United States

Références

JAMA. 2013 Jan 9;309(2):163-70
pubmed: 23299608
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Oct;52(10):3564-7
pubmed: 18663018
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Jan;49(1):137-43
pubmed: 15616287
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Aug;69(8):2086-90
pubmed: 24777907
JAMA. 2013 May 15;309(19):1989
pubmed: 23677303
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009 Sep;7(7):821-34
pubmed: 19735224
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Aug;1230:E19-28
pubmed: 22239555
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Aug;13(8):1275-7
pubmed: 17953118
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Sep;35(9):1549-56
pubmed: 27255221
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Oct 24;61(11):
pubmed: 28848021
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 May;46(5):1804-10
pubmed: 18367575
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Jun;68(6):1267-70
pubmed: 23416957
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 May;55(5):1454-1468
pubmed: 28228492
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Jun;69(6):1517-25
pubmed: 24535277
Mol Microbiol. 2005 Sep;57(5):1238-51
pubmed: 16101998
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009 Mar;10(4):555-77
pubmed: 19284360
Euro Surveill. 2011 Oct 27;16(43):
pubmed: 22085601
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Jul;57(7):3029-36
pubmed: 23587946
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Sep;53(9):3744-51
pubmed: 19528266
Int J STD AIDS. 2011 May;22(5):296-7
pubmed: 21571983
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Aug;67(8):1858-60
pubmed: 22566592
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Sep;70(9):2536-42
pubmed: 26084303
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 8;379(19):1795-1797
pubmed: 30403946
New Microbes New Infect. 2018 Apr 25;24:47-51
pubmed: 29872530
Euro Surveill. 2010 Nov 25;15(47):
pubmed: 21144442
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Feb;70(2):374-81
pubmed: 25331059
Emerg Infect Dis. 2018 Apr;24(4):
pubmed: 29553335
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2018 Sep-Oct;12(5):90-100
pubmed: 30202413
Sex Transm Dis. 2012 Apr;39(4):316-23
pubmed: 22421701
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Sep;37(9):1661-1672
pubmed: 29882175
Biochemistry. 2017 Feb 28;56(8):1140-1150
pubmed: 28145684
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Jun;67(6):1422-6
pubmed: 22334602
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Mar;14(3):220-6
pubmed: 24462211
Sex Transm Dis. 2019 Mar;46(3):e18-e25
pubmed: 30363025
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015 Jun 5;64(RR-03):1-137
pubmed: 26042815
Euro Surveill. 2011 Apr 07;16(14):
pubmed: 21492528
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Feb 25;14:106
pubmed: 24568221
J Bacteriol. 2006 Apr;188(7):2300-8
pubmed: 16547016
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Dec;65(12):2543-7
pubmed: 20940180
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Sep;53(9):4032-4
pubmed: 19546370
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 May 25;17(1):366
pubmed: 28545411
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Nov;50(11):3638-45
pubmed: 16940068
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Dec 04;13:570
pubmed: 24305088
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Aug;54(8):2074-81
pubmed: 27225407
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Nov;57(11):5225-32
pubmed: 23939890
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Jul;68(7):1567-71
pubmed: 23508619
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Mar;46(3):769-77
pubmed: 11850260
Biochemistry. 2010 Sep 21;49(37):8062-70
pubmed: 20704258
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 17;15:378
pubmed: 26381611
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jul;18(7):758-768
pubmed: 29776807
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Nov;18(5):730-7
pubmed: 6778384
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Feb;55(2):703-12
pubmed: 21098249
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jul;55(7):3538-45
pubmed: 21576437
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Mar;56(3):1273-80
pubmed: 22155830
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Mar;54(3):1060-7
pubmed: 20028823
Microb Drug Resist. 2017 Mar;23(2):247-252
pubmed: 27347854
Mol Microbiol. 1994 Feb;11(4):769-75
pubmed: 8196548
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Jan 25;13:40
pubmed: 23351067
J Infect Dis. 2016 Nov 15;214(10):1579-1587
pubmed: 27638945
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Dec;46(12):3744-9
pubmed: 12435671
Sex Transm Dis. 2017 Jun;44(6):351-355
pubmed: 28499284
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Apr;65(4):669-75
pubmed: 20093260

Auteurs

Xiaomeng Deng (X)

David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; and Corresponding author. Email: dengxiaomeng0416@gmail.com.

Lao-Tzu Allan-Blitz (LT)

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women&#39;s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; and Department of Medicine, Children&#39;s Hospital of Boston, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Jeffrey D Klausner (JD)

David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; and Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Center for Health Sciences, 37-121, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; and Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, 650 Charles E. Young Drive S., Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH