Progression of Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis: The Importance of Pneumoproteins Krebs von den Lungen 6 and CCL18.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Chemokines, CC
/ metabolism
Cyclophosphamide
/ therapeutic use
Disease Progression
Female
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Lung
/ metabolism
Lung Diseases, Interstitial
/ etiology
Male
Middle Aged
Mucin-1
/ metabolism
Mycophenolic Acid
/ therapeutic use
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Respiratory Function Tests
Scleroderma, Systemic
/ complications
Vital Capacity
Young Adult
Journal
Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)
ISSN: 2326-5205
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Rheumatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101623795
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
12
03
2019
accepted:
18
06
2019
pubmed:
25
6
2019
medline:
10
3
2020
entrez:
25
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the relationship between Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) and CCL18 levels and the severity and progression of systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related interstitial lung disease (ILD). Patients enrolled in the Scleroderma Lung Study II (cyclophosphamide [CYC] versus mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]) were included. Baseline and 12-month plasma samples were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to assess CCL18 and KL-6 levels. The forced vital capacity (FVC) and the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) were measured every 3 months. Joint models were created to investigate the relationship between baseline CCL18 and KL-6 levels and the course of the FVC and DLco over 1 year according to treatment arm. Baseline KL-6 and CCL18 levels each correlated with the extent of radiographic fibrosis. Levels of both CCL18 and KL-6 declined significantly at 1 year. In both treatment arms (n = 71 for CYC, n = 62 for MMF), a higher baseline KL-6 level predicted progression of ILD based on the course of FVC (P = 0.024 for CYC; P = 0.005 for MMF) and DLco (P < 0.001 for CYC; P = 0.004 for MMF) over 1 year. A higher baseline CCL18 level predicted progression of ILD based on the course of the FVC (P < 0.001 for CYC; P = 0.007 for MMF) and DLco (P = 0.001 for CYC; P < 0.001 for MMF) over 1 year, as well as mortality (P = 0.0008 for CYC arm only). In a rigorously conducted clinical trial for SSc-related ILD, KL-6 and CCL18 levels correlated with ILD severity and declined with immunosuppression. Patients with higher baseline KL-6 and CCL18 levels were more likely to experience disease progression despite treatment. KL-6 and CCL18 levels could be used to identify patients with a progressive ILD phenotype who may benefit from a more aggressive initial treatment approach.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31233287
doi: 10.1002/art.41020
pmc: PMC6883123
mid: NIHMS1037524
doi:
Substances chimiques
CCL18 protein, human
0
Chemokines, CC
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
MUC1 protein, human
0
Mucin-1
0
Cyclophosphamide
8N3DW7272P
Mycophenolic Acid
HU9DX48N0T
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2059-2067Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL089758
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL089901
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : K23 AR061436
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2019, American College of Rheumatology.
Références
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;63(10):3078-85
pubmed: 21618205
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010 Sep-Oct;28(5 Suppl 62):S26-35
pubmed: 21050542
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Oct;69(10):1809-15
pubmed: 20551155
Rheumatol Int. 2018 May;38(5):813-819
pubmed: 29455320
Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Sep;37(9):1283-9
pubmed: 7945490
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jun;71(6):972-982
pubmed: 30624031
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6 Suppl 86):S-138-44
pubmed: 24773853
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Sep;63(9):2797-808
pubmed: 21547897
Chest. 2016 Aug;150(2):299-306
pubmed: 26997242
Chest. 1984 Jun;85(6):751-8
pubmed: 6723384
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Aug;65(8):1375-80
pubmed: 23401350
J Rheumatol. 2009 Apr;36(4):773-80
pubmed: 19286849
Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(5):R166
pubmed: 20813056
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jan;78(1):122-130
pubmed: 30409830
J Rheumatol. 2013 Apr;40(4):435-46
pubmed: 23378460
J Rheumatol. 2016 Oct;43(10):1825-1831
pubmed: 27481907
J Rheumatol. 2018 Aug;45(8):1153-1158
pubmed: 29961690
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Sep;4(9):708-719
pubmed: 27469583
Respir Med. 2013 Jul;107(7):1079-86
pubmed: 23660398
Respir Med. 2013 Sep;107(9):1444-52
pubmed: 23831213
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Feb 14;21(1):58
pubmed: 30764869
J Dermatol. 2018 Dec;45(12):1425-1433
pubmed: 30289572
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Jun;66(6):1625-35
pubmed: 24591477
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2019 Feb;4(1):62-70
pubmed: 35382149
Arthritis Rheum. 1980 May;23(5):581-90
pubmed: 7378088
Eur Respir J. 2014 May;43(5):1530-2
pubmed: 24789955
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 30;370(5):433-43
pubmed: 24350901
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Jan;52(1):155-60
pubmed: 23065360
Presse Med. 2014 Oct;43(10 Pt 2):e329-43
pubmed: 25217474
Eur Respir J. 2011 Dec;38(6):1355-60
pubmed: 21778167
Trends Mol Med. 2016 Apr;22(4):303-316
pubmed: 26979628
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 22;354(25):2655-66
pubmed: 16790698
J Rheumatol. 2013 Jul;40(7):1114-20
pubmed: 23588945