Assessment of Dietary Under-Reporting in Italian College Team Sport Athletes.
athletes
dietary Intake
misreporting
team sport
under-reporting
Journal
Nutrients
ISSN: 2072-6643
Titre abrégé: Nutrients
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101521595
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Jun 2019
21 Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
08
05
2019
revised:
14
06
2019
accepted:
19
06
2019
entrez:
26
6
2019
pubmed:
27
6
2019
medline:
7
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nutrition is an important factor for sports performance and the assessment of dietary intakes in athletes can correct unhealthy eating habits. However, dietary assessment may be biased due to misreporting. The aim of our study was to investigate the occurrence of misreporting in a sample of collegiate team sport athletes. A total of 50 athletes participated. Each athlete filled in food records for seven days. Reported energy intake (EI) was considered in relation to the predicted basal metabolic rate (BMR) and expressed as the ratio EI/ BMR. All participants with EI/BMRestd ≤1.23 were classified as "low energy reporters" (LER), and those with an EI/BMRestd ratio >1.23 were classified as "adequate energy reporters" (AER). According to cut-off values for under-reporting, 28 out of 50 athletes (56%) were classified as LER. The LER (16 M/12 F) had significantly higher BMI (23.17 ± 3.46 kg/m Our results suggest that under-reporting of energy intake by collegiate team sport athletes may occur frequently and needs to be taken into consideration in the interpretation of nutrient intake.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Nutrition is an important factor for sports performance and the assessment of dietary intakes in athletes can correct unhealthy eating habits. However, dietary assessment may be biased due to misreporting. The aim of our study was to investigate the occurrence of misreporting in a sample of collegiate team sport athletes.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 50 athletes participated. Each athlete filled in food records for seven days. Reported energy intake (EI) was considered in relation to the predicted basal metabolic rate (BMR) and expressed as the ratio EI/ BMR. All participants with EI/BMRestd ≤1.23 were classified as "low energy reporters" (LER), and those with an EI/BMRestd ratio >1.23 were classified as "adequate energy reporters" (AER).
RESULTS
RESULTS
According to cut-off values for under-reporting, 28 out of 50 athletes (56%) were classified as LER. The LER (16 M/12 F) had significantly higher BMI (23.17 ± 3.46 kg/m
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that under-reporting of energy intake by collegiate team sport athletes may occur frequently and needs to be taken into consideration in the interpretation of nutrient intake.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31234276
pii: nu11061391
doi: 10.3390/nu11061391
pmc: PMC6627764
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Br J Nutr. 2009 Dec;102 Suppl 1:S10-37
pubmed: 20100364
J Sports Sci. 2004 Jan;22(1):15-30
pubmed: 14971430
J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2018 Aug 1;15(1):38
pubmed: 30068354
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2014;65(3):235-42
pubmed: 25247804
Appetite. 1996 Apr;26(2):153-74
pubmed: 8737167
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2007 Aug;17 Suppl:S58-76
pubmed: 18577776
Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(6):469-79
pubmed: 26055695
Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):283-294
pubmed: 27938425
Nutrients. 2017 Dec 02;9(12):
pubmed: 29207495
Nutr Res Rev. 1998 Dec;11(2):231-53
pubmed: 19094249
J Sports Sci. 2011;29 Suppl 1:S3-4
pubmed: 22150426
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991 Dec;45(12):569-81
pubmed: 1810719
Proc Nutr Soc. 2013 Feb;72(1):70-6
pubmed: 23336561
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 15;181(4):234-6
pubmed: 25656531
J Nutr. 2003 Mar;133 Suppl 3:895S-920S
pubmed: 12612176
Appetite. 2012 Feb;58(1):98-104
pubmed: 22027271
J Sports Sci Med. 2007 Dec 01;6(4):538-42
pubmed: 24149489
J Am Coll Nutr. 2012 Oct;31(5):301-10
pubmed: 23529987
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998 Apr;22(4):303-11
pubmed: 9578234
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012 Apr;37(2):225-32
pubmed: 22380725
J Sports Sci. 2011;29 Suppl 1:S17-27
pubmed: 21660838
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Jul 1;158(1):14-21; discussion 22-6
pubmed: 12835281
Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1985;39 Suppl 1:42-91
pubmed: 3900006
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Mar;48(3):543-68
pubmed: 26891166
Public Health Nutr. 2002 Aug;5(4):523-9
pubmed: 12186660
Public Health Nutr. 2001 Aug;4(4):919-27
pubmed: 11527517
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2003 Dec;13(4):521-38
pubmed: 14967874
Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Sep;52(3):421-5
pubmed: 2393004
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 May;107(5):792-9
pubmed: 17467374
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991 Dec;45(12):583-99
pubmed: 1810720
Br J Nutr. 2001 Apr;85(4):415-30
pubmed: 11348556
Nutr Rev. 2006 Feb;64(2 Pt 1):53-66
pubmed: 16536182
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Jan;115(1):64-77
pubmed: 25441955
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015 Aug;40(8):827-34
pubmed: 26224330
Int J Obes. 1991 Jan;15(1):17-25
pubmed: 2010255
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jul 20;103(14):1086-92
pubmed: 21653922
Sports Med. 2001;31(4):267-99
pubmed: 11310548
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2000 Sep;10(3):315-25
pubmed: 10997955
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Sep;24(9):1119-30
pubmed: 11033980
Ann Nutr Metab. 2010;57 Suppl 2:26-35
pubmed: 21346334
Metabolism. 1995 Feb;44(2 Suppl 2):18-22
pubmed: 7869932
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Oct;63(10):1192-9
pubmed: 19603055
J Sports Sci. 2011;29 Suppl 1:S115-25
pubmed: 21831001
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2003 Sep;6(5):539-49
pubmed: 12913671
ISM. 2010;:290-295
pubmed: 22020443
Br J Nutr. 1974 Jul;32(1):77-97
pubmed: 4843734
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Nov-Dec;44(6):574-83
pubmed: 21419711
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012 Aug;66(8):906-13
pubmed: 22378227
Br J Nutr. 2009 Jul;101 Suppl 2:S73-85
pubmed: 19594967
Br J Nutr. 2011 Jun;105(11):1671-80
pubmed: 21262062
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253
pubmed: 11234459
Nutr Rev. 1990 Oct;48(10):373-9
pubmed: 2082216