Automated and Quantitative Assessment of Tactile Mislocalization After Stroke.
localization deficits
quantitative measurement
robotic
stroke
topesthesia
topognosis
touch
vibration
Journal
Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
22
02
2019
accepted:
20
05
2019
entrez:
28
6
2019
pubmed:
28
6
2019
medline:
28
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Topesthesia, the recognition of tactile stimulation location on the skin, can be severely affected by neurological injuries, such as stroke. Despite topesthesia being crucial for manipulating objects and interacting with the environment during activities of daily living, deficits cannot be quantitatively captured with current clinical assessments and are, as a consequence, not well-understood. The present work describes a novel automated assessment tool for tactile mislocalization in neurological patients with somatosensory deficits. We present two cases of ischemic stroke patients, describe their tactile localization deficits with the automated assessment, and compare the results to a standard manual clinical assessment. Using the automated assessment tool, it was possible to identify, locate, precisely quantify, and depict the patients' deficits in topesthesia. In comparison, the clinical assessment was not sensitive enough and some deficits would remain undetected due to ceiling effects. In addition, an MRI structural analysis of the lesion supported the existence of somatosensory deficits. This novel and quantitative assessment may not only help to raise awareness of the implications of deficits in topesthesia, but would also allow monitoring recovery throughout the rehabilitation process, informing treatment design, and objectively evaluating treatment efficacy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31244757
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00593
pmc: PMC6581709
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
593Références
Somatosens Mot Res. 1999;16(3):197-206
pubmed: 10527368
Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;9(1):13-25
pubmed: 10643726
Neuroreport. 2000 Jun 5;11(8):1673-6
pubmed: 10852223
Neuroreport. 2000 Jun 26;11(9):2035-43
pubmed: 10884067
Cereb Cortex. 2001 May;11(5):463-73
pubmed: 11313298
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31
pubmed: 1135616
Behav Neurol. 2000;12(4):191-200
pubmed: 11568431
Neuroreport. 2002 Feb 11;13(2):207-11
pubmed: 11893911
Diabet Med. 2002 May;19(5):400-5
pubmed: 12027928
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;73(5):473-7
pubmed: 12397137
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jul;6(7):750-7
pubmed: 12808459
Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr Z Gesamte Neurol Psychiatr. 1959;200:93-122
pubmed: 13852003
Neuroimage. 2005 May 1;25(4):1325-35
pubmed: 15850749
Clin Rehabil. 2006 Feb;20(2):160-72
pubmed: 16541937
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Aug;17(8):1800-11
pubmed: 17032710
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;97(2):1288-97
pubmed: 17122318
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 May-Jun;21(3):263-72
pubmed: 17351081
Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Dec;26(10):1342-51
pubmed: 18550314
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):139-45
pubmed: 20046193
J Neurophysiol. 2010 May;103(5):2544-56
pubmed: 20164393
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jan;35(1):213-26
pubmed: 22965769
BMJ Case Rep. 2012 Oct 06;2012:null
pubmed: 23045439
J Neurosci. 2012 Nov 7;32(45):15815-22
pubmed: 23136420
Curr Biol. 2014 Mar 17;24(6):677-80
pubmed: 24613304
Aust Occup Ther J. 2015 Apr;62(2):93-104
pubmed: 25615889
Neurocase. 2016;22(1):95-102
pubmed: 25965510
Stroke. 1989 Jul;20(7):864-70
pubmed: 2749846
Sensors (Basel). 2017 May 24;17(6):
pubmed: 28538681
J Hand Surg Am. 1985 Nov;10(6 Pt 1):906-7
pubmed: 4078279
Brain Res. 1982 Jul 22;244(1):17-25
pubmed: 6288178
Brain. 1983 Mar;106 (Pt 1):1-19
pubmed: 6831192
J Hand Ther. 1993 Jan-Mar;6(1):11-22; discussion 50
pubmed: 8343870