Evaluation of orthotic insoles for people with diabetes who are at-risk of first ulceration.


Journal

Journal of foot and ankle research
ISSN: 1757-1146
Titre abrégé: J Foot Ankle Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101471610

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 13 02 2019
accepted: 03 06 2019
entrez: 28 6 2019
pubmed: 28 6 2019
medline: 31 1 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study focussed on pressure relieving orthotic insoles designed for retail footwear and people with diabetes and at risk of first forefoot ulceration. The aim was to investigate whether the pressure relieving effects of a customised metatarsal bar and forefoot cushioning are sensitive to bar location and shape, and material choice. Patient-specific foot shape was used to design an orthotic insole, with metatarsal bar location and shape customised according to plantar pressure data. Changes in forefoot plantar pressure were investigated when 60 people with diabetes and neuropathy walked in nine variants of the orthotic insole. These comprised three variations in proximal/distal location of the customised metatarsal bar and three different metatarsal head offloading materials. The most frequent reductions in pressure occurred when the anterior edge of the metatarsal bar was placed at 77% of the peak pressure values, and its effects were independent of the choice of EVA or Poron offloading material. In the flat insole, 61% of participants had one or more metatarsal head areas with pressure above the 200 KPa, reducing to 58% when adopting generic orthotic design rules and 51% when using the best orthotic insole of the nine tested. Our results confirm that plantar pressure relief is sensitive to orthotic insole design decisions and individual patient feet.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31244900
doi: 10.1186/s13047-019-0344-z
pii: 344
pmc: PMC6582464
doi:

Types de publication

Evaluation Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

35

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999 Oct;14(8):567-75
pubmed: 10521640
Diabet Med. 2003 Aug;20(8):665-9
pubmed: 12873296
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jul;83(7):500-6
pubmed: 15213473
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004 Jul;19(6):629-38
pubmed: 15234488
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jul;84(7):514-20
pubmed: 15973088
Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;86(6):833-42
pubmed: 16737409
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007 Jan;22(1):81-7
pubmed: 17046124
Foot Ankle Int. 2007 Jan;28(1):84-8
pubmed: 17257544
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Jun;23(5):640-7
pubmed: 18053624
Diabetes Care. 2008 May;31(5):839-44
pubmed: 18252899
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008 Apr;46(4):363-71
pubmed: 18266017
Diabet Med. 2009 Nov;26(11):1141-6
pubmed: 19929993
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jan;53(1):220-226.e1-5
pubmed: 20692793
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010 Sep-Oct;100(5):349-52
pubmed: 20847348
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2010 Sep-Oct;100(5):360-8
pubmed: 20847350
J Foot Ankle Res. 2010 Oct 08;3:23
pubmed: 20932291
Gait Posture. 2012 Jan;35(1):1-5
pubmed: 21944877
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012 Mar;36(1):53-62
pubmed: 22130911
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;102(1):18-24
pubmed: 22232317
Diabet Med. 2012 Dec;29(12):1542-9
pubmed: 22540919
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013 Jan;28(1):68-72
pubmed: 23103030
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jun;36(6):1613-8
pubmed: 23321218
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2012 Jun;6(2):127-34
pubmed: 23580893
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013 Jul;28(6):679-85
pubmed: 23731579
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013 Oct;28(8):831-45
pubmed: 24035444
Diabetes Care. 2013 Dec;36(12):4109-16
pubmed: 24130357
J Foot Ankle Res. 2014 Mar 05;7(1):18
pubmed: 24594070
J Postgrad Med. 2014 Jan-Mar;60(1):33-40
pubmed: 24625937
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Jan;32 Suppl 1:16-24
pubmed: 26334001
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Jan;32 Suppl 1:99-118
pubmed: 26342178
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Jan;32 Suppl 1:25-36
pubmed: 26813614
Gait Posture. 2016 May;46:69-74
pubmed: 27131180
J Diabetes Complications. 2016 Sep-Oct;30(7):1293-9
pubmed: 27338509
Gait Posture. 2016 Oct;50:232-238
pubmed: 27662483
J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Jul 6;10:27
pubmed: 28694849
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2018 Mar;53:86-92
pubmed: 29477099
Foot (Edinb). 2018 Jun;35:11-15
pubmed: 29753996
Gait Posture. 2018 Jul;64:90-94
pubmed: 29890399
Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Oct;15(10):561-6
pubmed: 7834065
J Biomech. 1996 Jul;29(7):979-83
pubmed: 8809630

Auteurs

Ana Martinez-Santos (A)

University of Salford, Salford, UK.

Stephen Preece (S)

University of Salford, Salford, UK.

Christopher J Nester (CJ)

University of Salford, Salford, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH