Aged rats with intact memory show distinctive recruitment in cortical regions relative to young adults in a cue mismatch task.
Journal
Behavioral neuroscience
ISSN: 1939-0084
Titre abrégé: Behav Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8302411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
28
6
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
entrez:
28
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Similar to elderly humans, aged Long-Evans rats exhibit individual differences in performance on tasks that critically depend on the medial temporal lobe memory system. Although reduced memory performance is common, close to half of aged rats in this outbred rodent population perform within the range of young subjects, exhibiting a stable behavioral phenotype that may signal a resilience to memory decline. Increasing evidence from research on aging in the Long-Evans study population supports the existence of adaptive neural change rather than avoidance of detrimental effects of aging on the brain, indicating a malleability of brain function over the life span that may preserve optimal function. Augmenting prior work that centered on hippocampal function, the current study extends investigation to cortical regions functionally interconnected with the hippocampal formation, including medial temporal lobe cortices and posterior components of the default mode network. In response to an environmental manipulation that creates a mismatch in the expected cue orientation, aged rats with preserved memory show greater activation across an extended network of cortical regions as measured by immediate early gene expression. In contrast, young subjects, behaviorally similar to the aged rats in this study, show a more limited cortical response. This distinctive cortical recruitment in aged unimpaired rats, set against a background of comparable activation across hippocampal subregions, may represent adaptive cortical recruitment consistent with evidence in human studies of neurocognitive aging. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31246080
pii: 2019-35437-001
doi: 10.1037/bne0000332
pmc: PMC6722034
mid: NIHMS1036875
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
537-544Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P01 AG009973
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG066507
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : T32 AG027668
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
Pays : United States
Références
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Oct 1;254:50-64
pubmed: 23872326
Neuroimage. 2016 Feb 15;127:496-509
pubmed: 26706448
Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Dec;36(12):3255-3268
pubmed: 26363813
Neuroimage. 2010 Jun;51(2):910-7
pubmed: 20188183
Nat Neurosci. 2014 May;17(5):725-31
pubmed: 24686786
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 12;105(6):2181-6
pubmed: 18238903
J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 23;31(12):4407-20
pubmed: 21430142
J Neurosci. 2007 Mar 14;27(11):2727-33
pubmed: 17360894
Front Syst Neurosci. 2017 Jun 30;11:49
pubmed: 28713251
Brain. 2016 Feb;139(Pt 2):547-62
pubmed: 26586695
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 13;8(12):e83674
pubmed: 24349543
J Neurosci. 2017 Sep 13;37(37):8965-8974
pubmed: 28821661
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 Mar;129:38-49
pubmed: 26514299
Hippocampus. 2012 Oct;22(10):2080-93
pubmed: 22987683
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 29;105(30):10601-6
pubmed: 18650386
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3764-74
pubmed: 22982484
Neurobiol Aging. 1995 May-Jun;16(3):271-8; discussion 278-84
pubmed: 7566337
J Comp Neurol. 1998 Aug 24;398(2):179-205
pubmed: 9700566
Neuron. 2015 Sep 2;87(5):1093-105
pubmed: 26298276
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Mar;35(4):1016-25
pubmed: 20032967
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 25;113(43):12286-12291
pubmed: 27791017
Neurobiol Aging. 2018 May;65:86-97
pubmed: 29454154
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Feb;17(2):304-11
pubmed: 24362760
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Feb;21(2):392-400
pubmed: 20538740
Behav Neurosci. 1993 Aug;107(4):618-26
pubmed: 8397866
Front Neuroinform. 2011 Apr 08;5:2
pubmed: 21519393
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Oct 26;20(11):1493-1503
pubmed: 29073645
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Dec;96(6):3517-31
pubmed: 16899645
J Comp Neurol. 2013 Oct 15;521(15):3508-23
pubmed: 23749483
Trends Neurosci. 2006 Dec;29(12):662-70
pubmed: 17046075
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jul 15;70(2):115-22
pubmed: 21316037
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 May;39(5):2020-2034
pubmed: 29363256
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 19;7(1):17812
pubmed: 29259243
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Jun;23(6):1317-28
pubmed: 22586140
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Jul;34(8):1178-94
pubmed: 20109489
Learn Mem. 2009 May 23;16(6):343-56
pubmed: 19470649
Neuron. 2012 May 10;74(3):467-74
pubmed: 22578498
Neurobiol Aging. 1998 May-Jun;19(3):227-32
pubmed: 9661997
J Neurosci. 2013 May 15;33(20):8668-77
pubmed: 23678111
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 23;369(1635):20130369
pubmed: 24366146
J Neurosci. 2018 Oct 3;38(40):8666-8679
pubmed: 30143571
Nature. 2004 Jul 22;430(6998):456-9
pubmed: 15229614
Neurobiol Aging. 2017 Jun;54:144-151
pubmed: 28104309
Neurobiol Aging. 2011 Sep;32(9):1678-92
pubmed: 19913943
Neuron. 2014 Jan 22;81(2):416-27
pubmed: 24462102
J Neurosci. 2002 Jul 15;22(14):6254-64
pubmed: 12122084
J Neurosci. 1994 Mar;14(3 Pt 2):1856-77
pubmed: 8126576
Neurobiol Aging. 2018 Oct;70:92-101
pubmed: 30007169
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:1-38
pubmed: 18400922
Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Apr;76:151-161
pubmed: 30716540
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Jul;25(7):1163-79
pubmed: 23384193
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 24;108(21):8873-8
pubmed: 21555581
Neuron. 2009 Jul 30;63(2):178-88
pubmed: 19640477
Neuron. 2007 Dec 6;56(5):924-35
pubmed: 18054866