VARSCOT: variant-aware detection and scoring enables sensitive and personalized off-target detection for CRISPR-Cas9.


Journal

BMC biotechnology
ISSN: 1472-6750
Titre abrégé: BMC Biotechnol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088663

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 06 2019
Historique:
received: 06 08 2018
accepted: 17 06 2019
entrez: 29 6 2019
pubmed: 30 6 2019
medline: 14 1 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Natural variations in a genome can drastically alter the CRISPR-Cas9 off-target landscape by creating or removing sites. Despite the resulting potential side-effects from such unaccounted for sites, current off-target detection pipelines are not equipped to include variant information. To address this, we developed VARiant-aware detection and SCoring of Off-Targets (VARSCOT). VARSCOT identifies only 0.6% of off-targets to be common between 4 individual genomes and the reference, with an average of 82% of off-targets unique to an individual. VARSCOT is the most sensitive detection method for off-targets, finding 40 to 70% more experimentally verified off-targets compared to other popular software tools and its machine learning model allows for CRISPR-Cas9 concentration aware off-target activity scoring. VARSCOT allows researchers to take genomic variation into account when designing individual or population-wide targeting strategies. VARSCOT is available from https://github.com/BauerLab/VARSCOT .

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Natural variations in a genome can drastically alter the CRISPR-Cas9 off-target landscape by creating or removing sites. Despite the resulting potential side-effects from such unaccounted for sites, current off-target detection pipelines are not equipped to include variant information. To address this, we developed VARiant-aware detection and SCoring of Off-Targets (VARSCOT).
RESULTS
VARSCOT identifies only 0.6% of off-targets to be common between 4 individual genomes and the reference, with an average of 82% of off-targets unique to an individual. VARSCOT is the most sensitive detection method for off-targets, finding 40 to 70% more experimentally verified off-targets compared to other popular software tools and its machine learning model allows for CRISPR-Cas9 concentration aware off-target activity scoring.
CONCLUSIONS
VARSCOT allows researchers to take genomic variation into account when designing individual or population-wide targeting strategies. VARSCOT is available from https://github.com/BauerLab/VARSCOT .

Identifiants

pubmed: 31248401
doi: 10.1186/s12896-019-0535-5
pii: 10.1186/s12896-019-0535-5
pmc: PMC6598273
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

40

Références

CRISPR J. 2018 Apr;1(2):159-170
pubmed: 31021199
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Feb;33(2):187-197
pubmed: 25513782
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Feb;34(2):184-191
pubmed: 26780180
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Dec;33(12):1293-1298
pubmed: 26524662
Nat Genet. 2017 Apr;49(4):625-634
pubmed: 28218758
Nat Med. 2017 Sep;23(9):1095-1101
pubmed: 28759051
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Feb;33(2):179-86
pubmed: 25503383
Genome Res. 2016 Mar;26(3):406-15
pubmed: 26786045
Sci Rep. 2014 Jun 23;4:5405
pubmed: 24956376
CRISPR J. 2018 Apr;1:182-190
pubmed: 31021206
Science. 2014 Nov 28;346(6213):1258096
pubmed: 25430774
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0169931
pubmed: 28095454
Nat Methods. 2015 Mar;12(3):237-43, 1 p following 243
pubmed: 25664545
Nat Methods. 2017 Jun;14(6):600-606
pubmed: 28459459
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 26;114(52):E11257-E11266
pubmed: 29229813
Genome Biol. 2016 Jul 05;17(1):148
pubmed: 27380939
Nature. 2010 Oct 28;467(7319):1061-73
pubmed: 20981092
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 12;8(1):593
pubmed: 29330493
Nat Biomed Eng. 2018 Jan;2(1):38-47
pubmed: 29998038
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 15;30(10):1473-5
pubmed: 24463181
Sci Adv. 2017 May 19;3(5):e1601910
pubmed: 28560324
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Sep;31(9):827-32
pubmed: 23873081

Auteurs

Laurence O W Wilson (LOW)

CSIRO, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Sara Hetzel (S)

CSIRO, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany.

Christopher Pockrandt (C)

Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

Knut Reinert (K)

Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany.

Denis C Bauer (DC)

CSIRO, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Denis.Bauer@csiro.au.

Articles similaires

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages

Exploring blood-brain barrier passage using atomic weighted vector and machine learning.

Yoan Martínez-López, Paulina Phoobane, Yanaima Jauriga et al.
1.00
Blood-Brain Barrier Machine Learning Humans Support Vector Machine Software
Humans Middle Aged Female Male Surveys and Questionnaires

Classifications MeSH