Circulating tumor DNA as a potential marker of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit following surgery for localized pancreatic cancer.


Journal

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 09 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 30 6 2019
medline: 4 6 2020
entrez: 29 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In early-stage pancreatic cancer, there are currently no biomarkers to guide selection of therapeutic options. This prospective biomarker trial evaluated the feasibility and potential clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis to inform adjuvant therapy decision making. Patients considered by the multidisciplinary team to have resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Pre- and post-operative samples for ctDNA analysis were collected. PCR-based-SafeSeqS assays were used to identify mutations at codon 12, 13 and 61 of KRAS in the primary pancreatic tumor and to detect ctDNA. Results of ctDNA analysis were correlated with CA19-9, recurrence-free and overall survival (OS). Patient management was per standard of care, blinded to ctDNA data. Of 112 patients consented pre-operatively, 81 (72%) underwent resection. KRAS mutations were identified in 91% (38/42) of available tumor samples. Of available plasma samples (N = 42), KRAS mutated ctDNA was detected in 62% (23/37) pre-operative and 37% (13/35) post-operative cases. At a median follow-up of 38.4 months, ctDNA detection in the pre-operative setting was associated with inferior recurrence-free survival (RFS) [hazard ratio (HR) 4.1; P = 0.002)] and OS (HR 4.1; P = 0.015). Detectable ctDNA following curative intent resection was associated with inferior RFS (HR 5.4; P < 0.0001) and OS (HR 4.0; P = 0.003). Recurrence occurred in 13/13 (100%) patients with detectable ctDNA post-operatively, including in seven that received gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. ctDNA studies in localized pancreatic cancer are challenging, with a substantial number of patients not able to undergo resection, not having sufficient tumor tissue for analysis or not completing per protocol sample collection. ctDNA analysis, pre- and/or post-surgery, is a promising prognostic marker. Studies of ctDNA guided therapy are justified, including of treatment intensification strategies for patients with detectable ctDNA post-operatively who appear at very high risk of recurrence despite gemcitabine-based adjuvant therapy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
In early-stage pancreatic cancer, there are currently no biomarkers to guide selection of therapeutic options. This prospective biomarker trial evaluated the feasibility and potential clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis to inform adjuvant therapy decision making.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients considered by the multidisciplinary team to have resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Pre- and post-operative samples for ctDNA analysis were collected. PCR-based-SafeSeqS assays were used to identify mutations at codon 12, 13 and 61 of KRAS in the primary pancreatic tumor and to detect ctDNA. Results of ctDNA analysis were correlated with CA19-9, recurrence-free and overall survival (OS). Patient management was per standard of care, blinded to ctDNA data.
RESULTS
Of 112 patients consented pre-operatively, 81 (72%) underwent resection. KRAS mutations were identified in 91% (38/42) of available tumor samples. Of available plasma samples (N = 42), KRAS mutated ctDNA was detected in 62% (23/37) pre-operative and 37% (13/35) post-operative cases. At a median follow-up of 38.4 months, ctDNA detection in the pre-operative setting was associated with inferior recurrence-free survival (RFS) [hazard ratio (HR) 4.1; P = 0.002)] and OS (HR 4.1; P = 0.015). Detectable ctDNA following curative intent resection was associated with inferior RFS (HR 5.4; P < 0.0001) and OS (HR 4.0; P = 0.003). Recurrence occurred in 13/13 (100%) patients with detectable ctDNA post-operatively, including in seven that received gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION
ctDNA studies in localized pancreatic cancer are challenging, with a substantial number of patients not able to undergo resection, not having sufficient tumor tissue for analysis or not completing per protocol sample collection. ctDNA analysis, pre- and/or post-surgery, is a promising prognostic marker. Studies of ctDNA guided therapy are justified, including of treatment intensification strategies for patients with detectable ctDNA post-operatively who appear at very high risk of recurrence despite gemcitabine-based adjuvant therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31250894
pii: S0923-7534(19)45991-7
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz200
pmc: PMC6771221
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Circulating Tumor DNA 0
KRAS protein, human 0
Deoxycytidine 0W860991D6
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) EC 3.6.5.2
Gemcitabine 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1472-1478

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA062924
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM136577
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA006973
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA152753
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

Br J Cancer. 2016 Jun 28;115(1):59-65
pubmed: 27280632
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 8;102(45):16368-73
pubmed: 16258065
Biomark Med. 2011 Feb;5(1):87-91
pubmed: 21319970
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 7;108(23):9530-5
pubmed: 21586637
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018 Oct;142(10):1242-1253
pubmed: 29504834
Ann Oncol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1715-22
pubmed: 25851626
J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jan;39(1):56-60
pubmed: 14767735
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 20;379(25):2395-2406
pubmed: 30575490
Nat Med. 2008 Sep;14(9):985-90
pubmed: 18670422
Gastroenterology. 2019 Jan;156(1):108-118.e4
pubmed: 30240661
Lancet. 2017 Mar 11;389(10073):1011-1024
pubmed: 28129987
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Aug 1;110(8):803-811
pubmed: 29873743
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):281-9
pubmed: 20651182
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Feb 19;6(224):224ra24
pubmed: 24553385
Cell. 1988 May 20;53(4):549-54
pubmed: 2453289
Nat Commun. 2015 Jul 07;6:7686
pubmed: 26154128
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jan 1;23(1):116-123
pubmed: 27993964

Auteurs

B Lee (B)

Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne. Electronic address: lee.b@wehi.edu.au.

L Lipton (L)

Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Australia.

J Cohen (J)

Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore.

J Tie (J)

Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne.

A A Javed (AA)

Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore.

L Li (L)

Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.

D Goldstein (D)

Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick.

M Burge (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane.

P Cooray (P)

Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Melbourne.

A Nagrial (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Westmead.

N C Tebbutt (NC)

Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Melbourne.

B Thomson (B)

Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne.

M Nikfarjam (M)

Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Melbourne.

M Harris (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton.

A Haydon (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

B Lawrence (B)

Department of Medical Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

D W M Tai (DWM)

Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore.

K Simons (K)

Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Centre for Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

A M Lennon (AM)

Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore.

C L Wolfgang (CL)

Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore.

C Tomasetti (C)

Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore; Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.

N Papadopoulos (N)

Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore.

K W Kinzler (KW)

Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore.

B Vogelstein (B)

Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore.

P Gibbs (P)

Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH