A kinetic metabolic study of lipid production in Chlorella protothecoides under heterotrophic condition.
Central carbon metabolism
Chlorella protothecoides
Dynamic flux analysis
Kinetic model
Metabolic modelling
Microalgae
Journal
Microbial cell factories
ISSN: 1475-2859
Titre abrégé: Microb Cell Fact
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139812
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jun 2019
28 Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
09
04
2019
accepted:
19
06
2019
entrez:
30
6
2019
pubmed:
30
6
2019
medline:
18
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Microalgae have been proposed as potential platform to produce lipid-derived products, such as biofuels. Knowledge on the intracellular carbon flow distribution may identify key metabolic processes during lipid synthesis thus refining culture/genetic strategies to maximize cell lipid productivity. A kinetic metabolic model simulating cell metabolic behavior and lipid production was first applied in the microalgae platform Chlorella protothecoides under heterotrophic condition. It combines both physiology and flux information in a kinetic approach. Cell nutrition, growth, lipid production and almost 30 metabolic intermediates covering central carbon metabolism were included and simulated. Model simulations were shown to adequately agree with experimental data, which is suggesting that the proposed model copes with Chlorella protothecoides cells' biology. The dynamic metabolic flux analysis using the model showed a reversible starch flux from accumulation to decomposing when glucose reached depletion, while net lipid flux shows a quasi-constant rate. The sensitive flux parameters on starch and lipid metabolism suggested that starch synthesis is the major competing pathway that affects lipid accumulation in C. protothecoides. Flux analysis also demonstrated that high lipid yield under heterotrophic condition is accompanied with high lipid flux and low TCA activity. Meanwhile, the dynamic flux distribution also suggests a relatively constant ratio of glucose distributed to biomass, lipid, starch, nucleotides as well as pentose phosphate pathway. The model described not only experimental data, but also unraveled intracellular carbon flow distribution and identify key metabolic processes during lipid synthesis. Most of the metabolic kinetics also showed statistical significance for metabolic mechanism. Therefore, this study unravels the mechanisms of the glucose impact on the dynamic carbon flux distribution, thus improving our understanding of the links between carbon fluxes and lipid metabolism in C. protothecoides.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Microalgae have been proposed as potential platform to produce lipid-derived products, such as biofuels. Knowledge on the intracellular carbon flow distribution may identify key metabolic processes during lipid synthesis thus refining culture/genetic strategies to maximize cell lipid productivity. A kinetic metabolic model simulating cell metabolic behavior and lipid production was first applied in the microalgae platform Chlorella protothecoides under heterotrophic condition. It combines both physiology and flux information in a kinetic approach. Cell nutrition, growth, lipid production and almost 30 metabolic intermediates covering central carbon metabolism were included and simulated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Model simulations were shown to adequately agree with experimental data, which is suggesting that the proposed model copes with Chlorella protothecoides cells' biology. The dynamic metabolic flux analysis using the model showed a reversible starch flux from accumulation to decomposing when glucose reached depletion, while net lipid flux shows a quasi-constant rate. The sensitive flux parameters on starch and lipid metabolism suggested that starch synthesis is the major competing pathway that affects lipid accumulation in C. protothecoides. Flux analysis also demonstrated that high lipid yield under heterotrophic condition is accompanied with high lipid flux and low TCA activity. Meanwhile, the dynamic flux distribution also suggests a relatively constant ratio of glucose distributed to biomass, lipid, starch, nucleotides as well as pentose phosphate pathway.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The model described not only experimental data, but also unraveled intracellular carbon flow distribution and identify key metabolic processes during lipid synthesis. Most of the metabolic kinetics also showed statistical significance for metabolic mechanism. Therefore, this study unravels the mechanisms of the glucose impact on the dynamic carbon flux distribution, thus improving our understanding of the links between carbon fluxes and lipid metabolism in C. protothecoides.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31253148
doi: 10.1186/s12934-019-1163-4
pii: 10.1186/s12934-019-1163-4
pmc: PMC6598345
doi:
Substances chimiques
Lipids
0
Carbon
7440-44-0
Starch
9005-25-8
Glucose
IY9XDZ35W2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113Subventions
Organisme : Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China
ID : ZR2019BC099
Organisme : Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
ID : RS-171172
Organisme : Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
ID : 093865-RGPIN2014-04329
Organisme : China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
ID : 2019M650167
Références
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999 Jun 20;63(6):675-83
pubmed: 10397824
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1997 Aug 20;55(4):592-608
pubmed: 18636570
BMC Syst Biol. 2009 Jan 07;3:4
pubmed: 19128495
J Theor Biol. 2009 Jul 7;259(1):118-31
pubmed: 19281825
Eukaryot Cell. 2009 Dec;8(12):1856-68
pubmed: 19880756
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010 Nov;162(7):1978-95
pubmed: 20443076
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011 Oct;108(10):2390-402
pubmed: 21538341
J Appl Phycol. 2012 Apr;24(2):253-266
pubmed: 22427720
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2013 Apr;36(4):469-87
pubmed: 22976819
Eukaryot Cell. 2013 Jun;12(6):776-93
pubmed: 23543671
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(6):e1003091
pubmed: 23818838
Photosynth Res. 2013 Nov;118(1-2):167-79
pubmed: 24142039
J Agric Food Chem. 2014 Apr 2;62(13):2709-27
pubmed: 24628496
Plant Physiol. 2015 Feb;167(2):586-99
pubmed: 25511434
Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 04;5:10738
pubmed: 26040780
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 09;5:15117
pubmed: 26450399
Environ Microbiol. 2017 Jun;19(6):2119-2132
pubmed: 28142226
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 04;7:45471
pubmed: 28374798
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 05;7:45732
pubmed: 28378827
Plant Cell. 2017 Aug;29(8):2047-2070
pubmed: 28765511