Interobserver agreement of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging is superior to whole-body computed tomography for assessing disease burden in patients with multiple myeloma.


Journal

European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Historique:
received: 16 10 2018
accepted: 22 05 2019
revised: 01 05 2019
pubmed: 4 7 2019
medline: 13 3 2020
entrez: 4 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is recommended by the International Myeloma Working Group for all patients with asymptomatic myeloma and solitary plasmacytoma and by the UK NICE guidance for all patients with suspected myeloma. Some centres unable to offer WB-MRI offer low-dose whole-body CT (WB-CT). There are no studies comparing interobserver agreement and disease detection of contemporary WB-MRI (anatomical imaging and DWI) versus WB-CT. Our primary aim is to compare the interobserver agreement between WB-CT and WB-MRI in the diagnosis of myeloma. Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed myeloma imaged with WB-MRI and WB-CT were prospectively reviewed. For each body region and modality, two experienced and two junior radiologists scored disease burden with final scores by consensus. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), median scores, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated. There was no significant difference in overall observer scores between WB-MRI and WB-CT (p = 0.87). For experienced observers, interobserver agreement for WB-MRI was superior to WB-CT overall and for each region, without overlap in whole-skeleton confidence intervals (ICC 0.98 versus 0.77, 95%CI 0.96-0.99 versus 0.45-0.91). For inexperienced observers, although there is a trend for a better interobserver score for the whole skeleton on WB-MRI (ICC 0.95, 95%CI 0.72-0.98) than on WB-CT (ICC 0.72, 95%CI 0.34-0.88), the confidence intervals overlap. WB-MRI offers excellent interobserver agreement which is superior to WB-CT for experienced observers. Although the overall burden was similar across both modalities, patients with lower disease burdens where MRI could be advantageous are not included in this series. • Whole-body MRI is recommended by the International Myeloma Working Group for patients with multiple myeloma and solitary plasmacytoma and by the NICE guidance for those with suspected multiple myeloma. • Some centres unable to offer whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) offer low-dose whole-body CT (WB-CT). • This prospective study demonstrates that contemporary WB-MRI (with anatomical sequences and DWI) provides better interobserver agreement in assessing myeloma disease burden for the whole skeleton and across any individual body region in myeloma patients when compared with low-dose whole-body CT.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31267214
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06281-x
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06281-x
pmc: PMC6890623
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

320-327

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : EME/16/68/34
Pays : United Kingdom

Références

Hillengass J, Moulopoulos LA, Delorme S et al (2017) Whole-body computed tomography versus conventional skeletal survey in patients with multiple myeloma: a study of the International Myeloma Working Group. Blood Cancer J 7:e599
doi: 10.1038/bcj.2017.78
Downey K, Castellano E, Mears D, Keiser M, Messiou C (2015) Low-dose whole-body CT for staging multiple myeloma. Clin Radiol 70:S7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2015.06.028
Wolf MB, Murray F, Kilk K et al (2014) Sensitivity of whole-body CT and MRI versus projection radiography in the detection of osteolyses in patients with monoclonal plasma cell disease. Eur J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.02.008
Giles SL, deSouza NM, Collins DJ et al (2015) Assessing myeloma bone disease with whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging: comparison with x-ray skeletal survey by region and relationship with laboratory estimates of disease burden. Clin Radiol 70:614–621
Baur-Melnyk A, Buhmann S, Becker C et al (2008) Whole-body MRI versus whole-body MDCT for staging of multiple myeloma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1097–1104. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2635
Sachpekidis C, Mosebach J, Freitag MT et al (2015) Application of (18)F-FDG PET and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in multiple myeloma: comparison of functional imaging modalities. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 5:479–492
pubmed: 26550539 pmcid: 4620175
Pawlyn C, Fowkes L, Otero S, et al (2016) Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI: a new gold standard for assessing disease burden in patients with multiple myeloma? Leukemia 30:1446–1448
Rasche L, Angtuaco E, McDonald JE et al (2017) Low expression of hexokinase-2 is associated with false-negative FDG–positron emission tomography in multiple myeloma. Blood 130:30
doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-03-774422
Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A et al (2014) International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 15:e538–e548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5 pubmed: 25439696
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2016) Myeloma: diagnosis and management. NICE Guideline 35. Available via https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng35/chapter/recommendations#imaging-investigations . Accessed 17 May2018
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2016) Myeloma: diagnosis and management. NICE Guideline 35. Available via Appendices A-F. Available via https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng35/evidence/appendices-af-pdf-2306487278 . Accessed 17 May2018
Pearce T, Philip S, Brown J, Koh DM, Burn PR (2012) Bone metastases from prostate, breast and multiple myeloma: differences in lesion conspicuity at short-tau inversion recovery and diffusion-weighted MRI. Br J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/30649204
Giles SL, Messiou C, Collins DJ et al (2014) Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging for assessment of treatment response in myeloma. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13131529
Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 pubmed: 27330520 pmcid: 27330520
Bujang MA, Baharum N (2017) A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: a review. Arch Orofac Sci 12:1–11
Kyriacou DN (2008) Reliability and validity of diagnostic tests. Acad Emerg Med 8:404–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb02125.x
Padhani AR, Koh DM, Collins DJ (2011) Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cancer: current status and research directions. Radiology 261:700–718. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110474
Dutoit JC, Verstraete KL (2016) MRI in multiple myeloma: a pictorial review of diagnostic and post-treatment findings. Insights Imaging 7:553–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0492-7
doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0492-7 pubmed: 27164915 pmcid: 4956620
Messiou C, Kaiser M (2015) Whole body diffusion weighted MRI - a new view of myeloma. Br J Haematol 171:29–37
Edwards CM, Zhuang J, Mundy GR (2008) The pathogenesis of the bone disease of multiple myeloma. Bone 42:1007–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2008.01.027
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.01.027 pubmed: 18406675 pmcid: 2474770
Chilla GS, Tan CH, Xu C, Poh CL (2015) Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging and its recent trend—a survey. Quant Imaging Med Surg 5:407–422. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2015.03.01
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2015.03.01 pubmed: 26029644 pmcid: 4426106

Auteurs

Alta Y T Lai (AYT)

The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong SAR.

Angela Riddell (A)

The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.

Tara Barwick (T)

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Kevin Boyd (K)

The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.

Andrea Rockall (A)

The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Martin Kaiser (M)

The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Dow-Mu Koh (DM)

The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Hind Saffar (H)

The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.

Siraj Yusuf (S)

The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.

Christina Messiou (C)

The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK. Christina.Messiou@rmh.nhs.uk.
The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. Christina.Messiou@rmh.nhs.uk.
Radiology Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Christina.Messiou@rmh.nhs.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH