Warning criteria for MEP monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective study of 571 patients.
Aged
Anesthesia, General
/ methods
Anesthetics
/ pharmacology
Area Under Curve
Brain Ischemia
/ diagnostic imaging
Endarterectomy, Carotid
/ methods
Evoked Potentials, Motor
/ physiology
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory
/ physiology
False Positive Reactions
Female
Humans
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Physiologic
/ methods
Neurophysiology
Neurosurgical Procedures
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Carotid endarterectomy
Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring
Motor evoked potentials
Warning criteria
Journal
Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
ISSN: 1573-2614
Titre abrégé: J Clin Monit Comput
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9806357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
02
03
2019
accepted:
27
06
2019
pubmed:
4
7
2019
medline:
10
8
2021
entrez:
4
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Monitoring of transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (tcMEP) during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been shown to effectively detect intraoperative cerebral ischemia. The unique purpose of this study was to evaluate changes of MEP amplitude (AMP), area under the curve (AUC) and signal morphology (MOR) as additional MEP warning criteria for clamping-associated ischemia during CEA. Therefore, the primary outcome was the number of MEP alerts (AMP, AUC and MOR) in the patients without postoperative motor deficit (false positives). We retrospectively reviewed data from 571 patients who received CEA under general anesthesia. Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and tcMEP was performed in all cases (all-or-none MEP warning criteria). The percentages of false positives (primary parameter) of AMP, AUC and MOR were evaluated according to the postoperative motor outcome. In the cohort of 562 patients, we found significant SSEP/MEP changes in 56 patients (9.96%). In 44 cases (7.83%) a shunt was inserted. Nine patients (1.57%) were excluded due to MEP recording failure. False positives were registered for AMP, AUC and MOR changes in 121 (24.01%), 148 (29.36%) and 165 (32.74%) patients, respectively. In combination of AMP/AUC and AMP/AUC/MOR false positives were found in 9.52% and 9.33% of the patients. This study is the first to evaluate the correctness of the MEP warning criteria AMP, AUC and MOR with regard to false positive monitoring results in the context of CEA. All additional MEP warning criteria investigated produced an unacceptably high number of false positives and therefore may not be useful in carotid surgery for adequate detection of clamping-associated ischemia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31267409
doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00345-5
pii: 10.1007/s10877-019-00345-5
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anesthetics
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM